Using Counter Attitudinal Advocacy to Change Drinking Behavior
2 other identifiers
interventional
591
1 country
2
Brief Summary
High volume drinking by young adults has proven resistant to change, so new approaches are needed. We adapt a theory-based attitude change strategy for use in alcohol prevention. This research tests the impact of brief writing and advocacy activities on subsequent drinking and negative consequences.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Nov 2019
Typical duration for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 31, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 2, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 12, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 30, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 30, 2023
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 16, 2025
CompletedMay 16, 2025
May 1, 2025
3.2 years
July 31, 2019
April 1, 2025
May 6, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Drinks Per Week as Assessed by the Daily Drinking Questionnaire
Number of standard drinks consumed in a typical week over the past 30 days; scores can range from zero but have no upper limit as they are counts of drinks
6-month follow up
Alcohol-related Consequences as Assessed by the Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire
The Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire is a checklist of 48 different consequences that could be experienced over the past 30 days; the total score ranges from 0-48; higher scores indicate more problems experienced in the past 30 days
6-month follow up
Study Arms (3)
Counter Attitudinal Advocacy
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this arm will articulate ways to avoid alcohol-related consequences using self-generated protective strategies and publicly state those strategies.
Personalized Normative Feedback
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants in this arm will view personalized normative feedback regarding their 1) own drinking quantity and frequency of drinking, 2) perceptions of typical drinking by same-sex students' on campus (i.e., perceived descriptive norms), and 3) actual drinking rates by same-sex students' on campus (i.e., actual descriptive norms).
Assessment-only Control
NO INTERVENTIONParticipants in this arm will not receive any intervention.
Interventions
same as Counter Attitudinal Advocacy arm
same as Personalized Normative Feedback arm
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18-26
- Male or female student at Brown University or University of Houston
- Past month heavy episodic drinking (for men, \>5 drinks in one day, for women \>4 drinks in one day)
- At least two self-reported negative consequences from drinking in the past month
You may not qualify if:
- status as a second semester Senior
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Brown Universitylead
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)collaborator
- University of Houstoncollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Brown University
Providence, Rhode Island, 02912, United States
University of Houston
Houston, Texas, 77204-5022, United States
Related Publications (1)
Carey KB, DiBello AM, Hatch MR, Weinstein AP, Neighbors C. Efficacy of counter-attitudinal advocacy and personalized feedback for heavy-drinking college students. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2025 May;93(5):357-368. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000949. Epub 2025 Mar 13.
PMID: 40080603DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Kate B. Carey
- Organization
- Brown University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kate B Carey, PhD
Brown University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 31, 2019
First Posted
August 2, 2019
Study Start
November 12, 2019
Primary Completion
January 30, 2023
Study Completion
January 30, 2023
Last Updated
May 16, 2025
Results First Posted
May 16, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, ICF
- Time Frame
- Within one year of study completion
- Access Criteria
- to be determined
After all data have been collected and the results of the study have been published, de-identified data will be made available to other qualified investigators upon request. The request will be evaluated by the investigators to ensure that it meets reasonable demands of scientific integrity.