tACS and tRNS Studies on Brain Control of Swallowing
Characterizing the Application of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation and Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation Over Human Pharyngeal Motor Cortex
1 other identifier
interventional
17
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) and transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) are two (CE marked medical devices) new, non-invasive (over the scalp) brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques. Both tACS and tRNS deliver a weak current continuously across the brain using pads placed over the scalp, which has been shown safe and well-tolerated by healthy adults and patients. These two techniques are able to softly alter physiological function within the brain. tACS can influence the brainwaves which have been demonstrated to play important roles in movement, sensation, and thinking functions. tACS and tRNS have been investigated for several years and have been shown to be safe, well tolerated and produce beneficial results in hand movement, hearing, and working memory. Swallowing problems are life-threatening symptom among patients with brain impairments and elderly people. Until now, there are no studies investigating whether tACS and tRNS can have a beneficial effect on swallowing function in human. Our aim is to examine the effects of different strengths of tACS and tRNS to determine the best approach for brain stimulation that controls swallowing action, before using these techniques in patients with (neurological) swallowing disorders. Participants: Healthy adults who are aged 18 years old or above with no medical complications or significant past medical history will be recruited in the study.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started May 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 25, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 3, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 15, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 18, 2020
CompletedMarch 30, 2020
March 1, 2020
7 months
April 25, 2019
March 27, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Changes of pharyngeal motor evoked potential amplitudes (PMEPs)
Cortical excitability of the pharyngeal motor cortices are being assessed as the primary endpoints. Therefore, the changes in EMG pharyngeal motor evoked potential amplitudes (PMEPs) following the intervention applied to pharyngeal motor cortex are being collected.
These cortical excitability measurements will be recorded at baseline, followed by immediately after intervention, then every 15 minutes up to 120 minutes afterwards.
Study Arms (5)
10 Hz tACS
EXPERIMENTALStimulation will be applied at 10 Hz tACS with an intensity of 1.5 mA (peak to peak), a fade in/out of 10 s and a duration of 10min. 10 Hz tACS will be performed over the pharyngeal cortex region and contralateral supraorbital region.
20 Hz tACS
EXPERIMENTALStimulation will be applied at 20 Hz tACS with an intensity of 1.5 mA (peak to peak), a fade in/out of 10 s and a duration of 10min. 20 Hz tACS will be performed over the pharyngeal cortex region and contralateral supraorbital region.
70Hz tACS
EXPERIMENTALStimulation will be applied at 70 Hz tACS with an intensity of 1.5 mA (peak to peak), a fade in/out of 10 s and a duration of 10min. 70 Hz tACS will be performed over the pharyngeal cortex region and contralateral supraorbital region.
0.1-640Hz tRNS
EXPERIMENTALStimulation will be applied at 0.1-640Hz tRNS with an intensity of 1.5 mA (peak to peak), a fade in/out of 10 s and a duration of 10min. 0.1-640Hz tRNS will be performed over the pharyngeal cortex region and contralateral supraorbital region.
Sham
SHAM COMPARATORStimulation will be performed only for 10 s before the fade out, with 20 Hz tACS and an intensity of 1.5 mA (peak to peak). Sham condition will be applied over pseudo-stimulation of pharyngeal cortex region and contralateral supraorbital region.
Interventions
Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) and transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) are two (CE marked medical devices) new, non-invasive (over the scalp) brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques. Both tACS and tRNS deliver a weak current continuously across the brain using pads placed over the scalp, which has been shown safe and well-tolerated by healthy adults and patients. These two techniques are able to softly alter physiological function within the brain. tACS can influence the brainwaves which have been demonstrated to play important roles in movement, sensation, and thinking functions. tACS and tRNS have been investigated for several years and have been shown to be safe, well tolerated and produce beneficial results in hand movement, hearing, and working memory.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Healthy adults who are aged 18 years old or above with no medical complications or significant past medical history
You may not qualify if:
- a history of epilepsy
- cardiac pacemaker
- previous brain surgery
- previous swallowing problems
- risk of potential pregnancy
- metal in the head or eyes
- use of medication that acts on the central nervous system.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Upper G.I laboratory, Salford Royal Hospital
Manchester, Greater Manchester, M6 8HD, United Kingdom
Related Publications (16)
Antal A, Herrmann CS. Transcranial Alternating Current and Random Noise Stimulation: Possible Mechanisms. Neural Plast. 2016;2016:3616807. doi: 10.1155/2016/3616807. Epub 2016 May 3.
PMID: 27242932BACKGROUNDAntal A, Alekseichuk I, Bikson M, Brockmoller J, Brunoni AR, Chen R, Cohen LG, Dowthwaite G, Ellrich J, Floel A, Fregni F, George MS, Hamilton R, Haueisen J, Herrmann CS, Hummel FC, Lefaucheur JP, Liebetanz D, Loo CK, McCaig CD, Miniussi C, Miranda PC, Moliadze V, Nitsche MA, Nowak R, Padberg F, Pascual-Leone A, Poppendieck W, Priori A, Rossi S, Rossini PM, Rothwell J, Rueger MA, Ruffini G, Schellhorn K, Siebner HR, Ugawa Y, Wexler A, Ziemann U, Hallett M, Paulus W. Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: Safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines. Clin Neurophysiol. 2017 Sep;128(9):1774-1809. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2017.06.001. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
PMID: 28709880BACKGROUNDHerrmann CS, Munk MH, Engel AK. Cognitive functions of gamma-band activity: memory match and utilization. Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 Aug;8(8):347-55. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.06.006.
PMID: 15335461BACKGROUNDEngel AK, Fries P, Singer W. Dynamic predictions: oscillations and synchrony in top-down processing. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001 Oct;2(10):704-16. doi: 10.1038/35094565.
PMID: 11584308BACKGROUNDPollok B, Boysen AC, Krause V. The effect of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) at alpha and beta frequency on motor learning. Behav Brain Res. 2015 Oct 15;293:234-40. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2015.07.049. Epub 2015 Jul 28.
PMID: 26225845BACKGROUNDWach C, Krause V, Moliadze V, Paulus W, Schnitzler A, Pollok B. Effects of 10 Hz and 20 Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on motor functions and motor cortical excitability. Behav Brain Res. 2013 Mar 15;241:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2012.11.038. Epub 2012 Dec 3.
PMID: 23219965BACKGROUNDJausovec N, Jausovec K. Increasing working memory capacity with theta transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS). Biol Psychol. 2014 Feb;96:42-7. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.11.006. Epub 2013 Nov 27.
PMID: 24291565BACKGROUNDRiecke L, Formisano E, Herrmann CS, Sack AT. 4-Hz Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Phase Modulates Hearing. Brain Stimul. 2015 Jul-Aug;8(4):777-83. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2015.04.004. Epub 2015 Apr 24.
PMID: 25981160BACKGROUNDClave P, Shaker R. Dysphagia: current reality and scope of the problem. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 May;12(5):259-70. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2015.49. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
PMID: 25850008BACKGROUNDJefferson S, Mistry S, Singh S, Rothwell J, Hamdy S. Characterizing the application of transcranial direct current stimulation in human pharyngeal motor cortex. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2009 Dec;297(6):G1035-40. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00294.2009. Epub 2009 Oct 8.
PMID: 19815630RESULTMoliadze V, Atalay D, Antal A, Paulus W. Close to threshold transcranial electrical stimulation preferentially activates inhibitory networks before switching to excitation with higher intensities. Brain Stimul. 2012 Oct;5(4):505-11. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2011.11.004. Epub 2012 Feb 22.
PMID: 22445135RESULTUhlhaas PJ, Singer W. Abnormal neural oscillations and synchrony in schizophrenia. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010 Feb;11(2):100-13. doi: 10.1038/nrn2774.
PMID: 20087360RESULTMoisa M, Polania R, Grueschow M, Ruff CC. Brain Network Mechanisms Underlying Motor Enhancement by Transcranial Entrainment of Gamma Oscillations. J Neurosci. 2016 Nov 23;36(47):12053-12065. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2044-16.2016.
PMID: 27881788RESULTFertonani A, Pirulli C, Miniussi C. Random noise stimulation improves neuroplasticity in perceptual learning. J Neurosci. 2011 Oct 26;31(43):15416-23. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2002-11.2011.
PMID: 22031888RESULTRjosk V, Kaminski E, Hoff M, Gundlach C, Villringer A, Sehm B, Ragert P. Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation at Beta Frequency: Lack of Immediate Effects on Excitation and Interhemispheric Inhibition of the Human Motor Cortex. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Nov 3;10:560. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00560. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 27857687RESULTTerney D, Chaieb L, Moliadze V, Antal A, Paulus W. Increasing human brain excitability by transcranial high-frequency random noise stimulation. J Neurosci. 2008 Dec 24;28(52):14147-55. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4248-08.2008.
PMID: 19109497RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Shaheen Hamdy, MD,PhD
GI-sciences, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 25, 2019
First Posted
August 1, 2019
Study Start
May 3, 2019
Primary Completion
November 15, 2019
Study Completion
March 18, 2020
Last Updated
March 30, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The Gastrointestinal Sciences research team at the University of Manchester will have access to participants' identifiable information, but it will be anonymized as soon as participants are enrolled in this study. Representatives from the University of Manchester and regulatory authorities will have access to the anonymised data if required for auditing and monitoring process. However, participants' anonymised consent form, contact details, and data collected for this study will be retained for 5 years.