NCT04038645

Brief Summary

Nasal fractures are one of the most incidental of facial traumas. Regression of nasal edema is necessary so that surgical reduction of the fracture can be performed. It is known that photobiomodulation (PBM) reduces pain, edema and modulates inflammation. Regression of edema in a shorter time may decrease hospitalization time, decreasing hospital costs. However, there are no well-designed clinical studies on this subject. Therefore, the objective of this study will be to evaluate if PBM is able to reduce edema in the region of fractured nasal bones prior to nasal reduction and nasal packing, in order to reduce the patient's ability to go through surgery. Thirty-six patients diagnosed with a (primary) nasal fracture admitted to the Mandaqui Hospital Complex whose trauma occurred in the last 48 hours will be randomly divided into: G1- (control) (n = 18). . G2-Light emitter diode (LED) group (n = 18) - The standard hospital treatment will be performed + LED nasal mask. The main variable will be the edema evaluated by the same researcher and with the same technique. Secondary variables will be pain (visual analogue scale - VAS), temperature, rescue medication count, serum C-reactive protein and systemic inflammatory cytokines. Afterwards, the LED or its placebo will also be applied. The questionnaire to assess the impact of treatment on quality of life will be applied at the baseline and after 8 days. Adverse effects will be recorded and reported. If the data is normal, they will be submitted to Student's t-test. The data will be presented by their means ± standard deviation (SD) and the value of p will be set at 0.05.

Trial Health

15
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2019

Status
withdrawn

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 25, 2019

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 31, 2019

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2019

Completed
29 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 30, 2019

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 15, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

June 29, 2023

Status Verified

December 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

29 days

First QC Date

July 25, 2019

Last Update Submit

June 27, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

Nasal FracturePhotobiomodulationLaserEdema

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Edema

    It will be applied a grading system for evaluating eyelid edema: 0 point, none; 1 point, minimal; 2 points, extending on to the iris; 3 points, covering the iris; 4 points, massive edema with the eyelid swollen shut.

    Throughout study completion on average of one year

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • pain assessed by Vas

    Throughout study completion on average of one year

  • Oral health related quality of life (OHRQoL) assessed by ohip-14

    Throughout study completion on average of one year

  • C-reactive protein (CRP)

    Throughout study completion on average of one year

  • temperature

    Throughout study completion on average of one year.

  • Nasal Obstruction

    Throughout study completion on average of one year.

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Experimental Group (laser)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The patients (n=18) will receive infrared LEDs in 6 points (3 on the right side and 3 on the left side) using a mask developed for the research . The irradiations will be performed with red LED ( wavelength = 660 nm) with output power of 100 milliwatt (mW) . The LED light outputs will be positioned in direct contact with the skin. During application of the LED both patient and operator will wear goggles. The red diode laser will be used. The power of the device is 100 mW and the wavelength used was 660nm (± 10nm). The diameter of the fiber optic of the apparatus has 600 μm, therefore a spot (area) of 0.002826cm2. The energy delivered per point is 1 Joule. 10 seconds of application is required. As 6 points are irradiated, the total energy delivered is 6 Joules. The energy density is 354 J / cm2 and the power density would be 35.4 W / cm2. The points will be determined by the same operator, obeying the protocol.

Other: Experimental group (laser)

Control group (Placebo)

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

The patients (n=18) will receive the LED at the same points recommended for the experimental group, but will be off. So that the patient does not identify the sound of activation of the device (beep), it will be recorded, and connected at the time of the application of the laser. The questionnaire to assess the impact of treatment on quality of life will be applied at baseline and after 8 days (by the same evaluator), as well as the evaluation of serum CRP.

Other: Control group (Placebo)

Interventions

The patients will receive infrared LEDs in 6 points using a mask developed for the research . The irradiations will be performed with red LED ( wavelength = 660 nm) with output power of 100 milliwatt. During application of the LED both patient and operator will wear goggles. The red diode laser will be used. The power of the device is 100 mW and the wavelength used was 660nm (± 10nm). The diameter of the fiber optic of the apparatus has 600 μm, therefore a spot (area) of 0.002826cm2. The energy delivered per point is 1 Joule. 10 seconds of application is required. As 6 points are irradiated, the total energy delivered is 6 Joules. The energy density is 354 J / cm2 and the power density would be 35.4 W / cm2. The points will be determined by the same operator, obeying the protocol.

Experimental Group (laser)

Patients will receive the LED at the same points recommended for the experimental group, but will be off. So that the patient does not identify the sound of activation of the device (beep), it will be recorded, and connected at the time of the application of the laser. The questionnaire to assess the impact of treatment on quality of life will be applied at baseline and after 8 days as well as the evaluation of serum CRP.

Control group (Placebo)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • healthy participants.
  • With a maximum of 48 hours after nasal trauma.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients using anticoagulant medication or use of medication that is anti-inflammatory chronically .
  • Patients who report a hypersensitivity reaction to any drug used in the research
  • Patients with previous nasal fractures.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (2)

  • Kargi E, Hosnuter M, Babuccu O, Altunkaya H, Altinyazar C. Effect of steroids on edema, ecchymosis, and intraoperative bleeding in rhinoplasty. Ann Plast Surg. 2003 Dec;51(6):570-4. doi: 10.1097/01.sap.0000095652.35806.c5.

    PMID: 14646651BACKGROUND
  • Oliveira Sierra S, Melo Deana A, Mesquita Ferrari RA, Maia Albarello P, Bussadori SK, Santos Fernandes KP. Effect of low-level laser therapy on the post-surgical inflammatory process after third molar removal: study protocol for a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2013 Nov 6;14:373. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-373.

    PMID: 24195796BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Edema

Interventions

LasersControl Groups

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Signs and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Optical DevicesEquipment and SuppliesRadiation Equipment and SuppliesEpidemiologic Research DesignEpidemiologic MethodsInvestigative TechniquesResearch DesignMethods

Study Officials

  • Anna Carolina RT Horliana, Phd

    Nove de Julho University (Uninove)

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
0

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Masking Details
Only the researcher responsible for conducting the treatments (who will open the envelopes of the randomization) will know which treatment is assigned to each patient. The identification of each group will be revealed only after statistical analysis of the data for all those involved in the study by this researcher. Therefore, the researcher responsible for data collection (evaluation of edema and all secondary variables), the microbiologist and the statistician will be blind regarding the treatments assigned to the groups. The patient will also be blinded to the type of treatment performed, since the treatment with PBM will be identical in both groups and the treatment with PBM will be simulated in the control group.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: 36 patients will be allocated in the experimental and control groups: G1 - Experimental Group (n = 18 Photobiomodulation PBM) - the treatment will be performed in a conventional manner and the patient will receive laser at low intensity. G2 - Control group (n = 18 -placebo of PBM) - treatment will be performed in a conventional manner and simulation of PBM treatment.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Clinical Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 25, 2019

First Posted

July 31, 2019

Study Start

December 1, 2019

Primary Completion

December 30, 2019

Study Completion

October 15, 2020

Last Updated

June 29, 2023

Record last verified: 2019-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share