Optimizing Ankle Exoskeleton Assistance for Walking Across the Life Span
2 other identifiers
interventional
16
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The investigators seek to determine whether ankle exoskeletons can reduce metabolic energy expenditure during walking for users across the age-spectrum.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2020
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 23, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 25, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 4, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 23, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 23, 2023
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 21, 2024
CompletedJune 21, 2024
June 1, 2024
3.3 years
July 23, 2019
April 29, 2024
June 18, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Net Metabolic Rate (Watts/kg)
The rate of metabolic energy that participants expend during a short walking bout in each of the experimental conditions.
3rd session, up to 2 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Young Adult Exoskeleton Users
EXPERIMENTALStudy participants who are 18-45 year old.
Older Adult Exoskeleton Users
EXPERIMENTALStudy participants who are greater than 65 years of age.
Interventions
The investigators will use ankle-exoskeletons to modulate the amount of mechanical power generated by the user's ankle joint. That is, participants will walk in a robotic device that either (a) adds a spring or (b) a motor in parallel with their calf muscles to help them generate a stronger propulsive push-off that could reduce the effort of walking.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects must be able to walk for 60 minutes in a 90-minute time frame.
- Subjects are apparently free of cardiovascular, metabolic, and renal disease, which includes no signs or symptoms suggestive of cardiovascular, metabolic or renal disease.
- Subjects have no current musculoskeletal injury.
- Subjects need to be either 18-45 or 65+ years old.
- These criteria meet the American College of Sports Medicine's 2015 guidelines for participant health screening prior to joining a moderate or moderate-to-vigorous exercise protocol. (Riebe et al., 2015).
You may not qualify if:
- Have dementia or an inability to give informed consent
- Have a musculoskeletal injury or feel pain while walking
- Have a history of dizziness and/or balance problems
- Have cardiovascular, heart, metabolic, or renal disease, or respiratory problems
- Smoke cigarettes
- Asthma
- Feel pain or discomfort in the chest, neck, jaw, arms during rest or exercise
- Have orthopnea or paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea
- Have ankle edema
- Have palpitations or tachycardia
- Have a heart murmur
- Have had a heart attack
- Have diabetes
- Have a pace maker
- Have unusual shortness of breath with usual activities
- +2 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Georgia Institute of Technologylead
- National Institute on Aging (NIA)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Physiology of Wearable Robotics Laboratory (Georgia Tech)
Atlanta, Georgia, 30332, United States
Related Publications (37)
Asbeck AT, De Rossi SM, Holt KG, and Walsh CJ. A biologically inspired soft exosuit for walking assistance. The international journal of robotics research 34: 744-762, 2015.
BACKGROUNDBiewener AA, Farley CT, Roberts TJ, Temaner M. Muscle mechanical advantage of human walking and running: implications for energy cost. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2004 Dec;97(6):2266-74. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00003.2004. Epub 2004 Jul 16.
PMID: 15258124BACKGROUNDBrowne MG, Franz JR. The independent effects of speed and propulsive force on joint power generation in walking. J Biomech. 2017 Apr 11;55:48-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.02.011. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
PMID: 28262285BACKGROUNDCavagna GA, Kaneko M. Mechanical work and efficiency in level walking and running. J Physiol. 1977 Jun;268(2):467--81. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011866.
PMID: 874922BACKGROUNDCAVAGNA GA, SAIBENE FP, MARGARIA R. MECHANICAL WORK IN RUNNING. J Appl Physiol. 1964 Mar;19:249-56. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1964.19.2.249. No abstract available.
PMID: 14155290BACKGROUNDCollins SH, Wiggin MB, Sawicki GS. Reducing the energy cost of human walking using an unpowered exoskeleton. Nature. 2015 Jun 11;522(7555):212-5. doi: 10.1038/nature14288. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
PMID: 25830889BACKGROUNDCsapo R, Malis V, Hodgson J, Sinha S. Age-related greater Achilles tendon compliance is not associated with larger plantar flexor muscle fascicle strains in senior women. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2014 Apr 15;116(8):961-9. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01337.2013. Epub 2014 Feb 6.
PMID: 24505104BACKGROUNDDeVita P, Helseth J, Hortobagyi T. Muscles do more positive than negative work in human locomotion. J Exp Biol. 2007 Oct;210(Pt 19):3361-73. doi: 10.1242/jeb.003970.
PMID: 17872990BACKGROUNDDeVita P, Hortobagyi T. Age causes a redistribution of joint torques and powers during gait. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2000 May;88(5):1804-11. doi: 10.1152/jappl.2000.88.5.1804.
PMID: 10797145BACKGROUNDElliott G, Sawicki GS, Marecki A, Herr H. The biomechanics and energetics of human running using an elastic knee exoskeleton. IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot. 2013 Jun;2013:6650418. doi: 10.1109/ICORR.2013.6650418.
PMID: 24187237BACKGROUNDFarris DJ, Sawicki GS. The mechanics and energetics of human walking and running: a joint level perspective. J R Soc Interface. 2012 Jan 7;9(66):110-8. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2011.0182. Epub 2011 May 25.
PMID: 21613286BACKGROUNDFerris DP, Sawicki GS, Domingo A. Powered lower limb orthoses for gait rehabilitation. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2005;11(2):34-49. doi: 10.1310/6gl4-um7x-519h-9jyd.
PMID: 16568153BACKGROUNDFranz JR, Slane LC, Rasske K, Thelen DG. Non-uniform in vivo deformations of the human Achilles tendon during walking. Gait Posture. 2015 Jan;41(1):192-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.10.001. Epub 2014 Oct 12.
PMID: 25457482BACKGROUNDGottschall JS, Kram R. Energy cost and muscular activity required for propulsion during walking. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2003 May;94(5):1766-72. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00670.2002. Epub 2002 Dec 27.
PMID: 12506042BACKGROUNDGriffin TM, Tolani NA, Kram R. Walking in simulated reduced gravity: mechanical energy fluctuations and exchange. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1999 Jan;86(1):383-90. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1999.86.1.383.
PMID: 9887153BACKGROUNDHolt NC, Roberts TJ, Askew GN. The energetic benefits of tendon springs in running: is the reduction of muscle work important? J Exp Biol. 2014 Dec 15;217(Pt 24):4365-71. doi: 10.1242/jeb.112813. Epub 2014 Nov 13.
PMID: 25394624BACKGROUNDHuang HJ, Kram R, Ahmed AA. Reduction of metabolic cost during motor learning of arm reaching dynamics. J Neurosci. 2012 Feb 8;32(6):2182-90. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4003-11.2012.
PMID: 22323730BACKGROUNDMalcolm P, Derave W, Galle S, De Clercq D. A simple exoskeleton that assists plantarflexion can reduce the metabolic cost of human walking. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e56137. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056137. Epub 2013 Feb 13.
PMID: 23418524BACKGROUNDMartin PE, Rothstein DE, Larish DD. Effects of age and physical activity status on the speed-aerobic demand relationship of walking. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1992 Jul;73(1):200-6. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1992.73.1.200.
PMID: 1506370BACKGROUNDMian OS, Thom JM, Ardigo LP, Minetti AE, Narici MV. Gastrocnemius muscle-tendon behaviour during walking in young and older adults. Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2007 Jan;189(1):57-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.2006.01634.x.
PMID: 17280557BACKGROUNDMooney LM, Rouse EJ, Herr HM. Autonomous exoskeleton reduces metabolic cost of human walking during load carriage. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014 May 9;11:80. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-11-80.
PMID: 24885527BACKGROUNDNelson ME, Rejeski WJ, Blair SN, Duncan PW, Judge JO, King AC, Macera CA, Castaneda-Sceppa C; American College of Sports Medicine; American Heart Association. Physical activity and public health in older adults: recommendation from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2007 Aug 28;116(9):1094-105. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.185650. Epub 2007 Aug 1.
PMID: 17671236BACKGROUNDNuckols Rich DT, Sawicki Greg. Ultrasound measurements link soleus muscle dynamics and metabolic cost during human walking with elastic ankle exoskeletons. In Prep.
BACKGROUNDOnambele GL, Narici MV, Maganaris CN. Calf muscle-tendon properties and postural balance in old age. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2006 Jun;100(6):2048-56. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01442.2005. Epub 2006 Feb 2.
PMID: 16455811BACKGROUNDOrtega JD, Beck ON, Roby JM, Turney AL, Kram R. Running for exercise mitigates age-related deterioration of walking economy. PLoS One. 2014 Nov 20;9(11):e113471. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113471. eCollection 2014.
PMID: 25411850BACKGROUNDOrtega JD, Farley CT. Individual limb work does not explain the greater metabolic cost of walking in elderly adults. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2007 Jun;102(6):2266-73. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00583.2006. Epub 2007 Mar 15.
PMID: 17363623BACKGROUNDOrtega JO, Lindstedt SL, Nelson FE, Jubrias SA, Kushmerick MJ, Conley KE. Muscle force, work and cost: a novel technique to revisit the Fenn effect. J Exp Biol. 2015 Jul;218(Pt 13):2075-82. doi: 10.1242/jeb.114512. Epub 2015 May 11.
PMID: 25964423BACKGROUNDPanizzolo FA, Green DJ, Lloyd DG, Maiorana AJ, Rubenson J. Soleus fascicle length changes are conserved between young and old adults at their preferred walking speed. Gait Posture. 2013 Sep;38(4):764-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.03.021. Epub 2013 May 1.
PMID: 23642629BACKGROUNDRall JA. Sense and nonsense about the Fenn effect. Am J Physiol. 1982 Jan;242(1):H1-6. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1982.242.1.H1.
PMID: 7058903BACKGROUNDRasske K, Thelen DG, Franz JR. Variation in the human Achilles tendon moment arm during walking. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2017 Feb;20(2):201-205. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2016.1213818. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
PMID: 27460018BACKGROUNDRubenson J, Pires NJ, Loi HO, Pinniger GJ, Shannon DG. On the ascent: the soleus operating length is conserved to the ascending limb of the force-length curve across gait mechanics in humans. J Exp Biol. 2012 Oct 15;215(Pt 20):3539-51. doi: 10.1242/jeb.070466. Epub 2012 Jul 5.
PMID: 22771749BACKGROUNDSawicki GS, Ferris DP. Mechanics and energetics of level walking with powered ankle exoskeletons. J Exp Biol. 2008 May;211(Pt 9):1402-13. doi: 10.1242/jeb.009241.
PMID: 18424674BACKGROUNDStanaway FF, Gnjidic D, Blyth FM, Le Couteur DG, Naganathan V, Waite L, Seibel MJ, Handelsman DJ, Sambrook PN, Cumming RG. How fast does the Grim Reaper walk? Receiver operating characteristics curve analysis in healthy men aged 70 and over. BMJ. 2011 Dec 15;343:d7679. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d7679.
PMID: 22174324BACKGROUNDStenroth L, Peltonen J, Cronin NJ, Sipila S, Finni T. Age-related differences in Achilles tendon properties and triceps surae muscle architecture in vivo. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2012 Nov;113(10):1537-44. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00782.2012. Epub 2012 Oct 4.
PMID: 23042907BACKGROUNDStudenski S, Perera S, Patel K, Rosano C, Faulkner K, Inzitari M, Brach J, Chandler J, Cawthon P, Connor EB, Nevitt M, Visser M, Kritchevsky S, Badinelli S, Harris T, Newman AB, Cauley J, Ferrucci L, Guralnik J. Gait speed and survival in older adults. JAMA. 2011 Jan 5;305(1):50-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1923.
PMID: 21205966BACKGROUNDTakahashi KZ, Gross MT, van Werkhoven H, Piazza SJ, Sawicki GS. Adding Stiffness to the Foot Modulates Soleus Force-Velocity Behaviour during Human Walking. Sci Rep. 2016 Jul 15;6:29870. doi: 10.1038/srep29870.
PMID: 27417976BACKGROUNDTakahashi KZ, Lewek MD, Sawicki GS. A neuromechanics-based powered ankle exoskeleton to assist walking post-stroke: a feasibility study. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2015 Feb 25;12:23. doi: 10.1186/s12984-015-0015-7.
PMID: 25889283BACKGROUND
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Gregory S. Sawicki; Professor Mechanical Engineering
- Organization
- Georgia Insitute of Technology
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Gregory S Sawicki, Ph.D.
Georgia Institute of Technology
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 23, 2019
First Posted
July 25, 2019
Study Start
February 4, 2020
Primary Completion
May 23, 2023
Study Completion
May 23, 2023
Last Updated
June 21, 2024
Results First Posted
June 21, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share