DiagnosE Using the Central veIn SIgn
DECISIve
DECISIve - DiagnosE Using the Central veIn SIgn. A Prospective Diagnostic Superiority Study Comparing T2* MRI and Lumbar Puncture in Patients Presenting With Possible Multiple Sclerosis
1 other identifier
observational
115
1 country
4
Brief Summary
There is currently no agreement on the best way to diagnose Multiple Sclerosis (MS). Frequently, people suspected of having MS have a standard MRI scan and undergo a 'lumbar puncture' (a thin needle is inserted between the bones in the lower spine). Patients often report they find it painful and it can cause unintended complications requiring hospitalisations or time off work to recover. Although the fluid taken during a lumbar puncture can show evidence of disease, this is not always the case. Doctors do not find abnormalities in everyone who has MS but some people with conditions that can mimic MS, but need very different treatment, have similar lumbar puncture abnormalities. Both of these problems can lead to misdiagnosis. A new MRI scan allows doctors to see small veins that run through damaged areas of the brain in people with MS. It has been shown that this is a specific finding to MS, seldom seen in other conditions. It is not painful and carries few or no risks. This research aims to change the way people are diagnosed with MS and reduce the number of lumbar punctures used. The investigators will recruit a large number of people from different hospitals whose doctors suspect they may have MS. They will be invited to have the new eight-minute MRI scan. After 18 months, the investigators will find out what diagnosis is eventually reached and compare this to the finding of the new scan. The investigators will then compare the accuracy, speed, costs and acceptability of the different tests needed to make a diagnosis of MS and establish if most lumbar punctures can be replaced by a slightly longer MRI scan. This research could provide the National Health Service with a scientific approach to diagnose MS which is safer, more cost effective and importantly, more acceptable to patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Nov 2019
Typical duration for all trials
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 12, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 18, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 6, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2022
CompletedMarch 4, 2020
July 1, 2019
2.5 years
June 12, 2019
March 2, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The sensitivity of the central vein sign (CVS) on T2* MRI scan and lumbar puncture with oligoclonal band testing at diagnosing MS at the time of the patients' first presentation.
The reference standard for both tests will be clinical diagnosis 18 months after recruitment. The sensitivity of each test will be reported separately along with 95% confidence intervals. The sensitivity of the tests will be compared using McNemar's test for paired proportions.
18 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
The specificity of the central vein sign (CVS) on T2* MRI scan and lumbar puncture with oligoclonal band testing at diagnosing MS at the time of the patients' first presentation.
18 months
The sensitivity and specificity of the 'rule of six' proposed in Mistry et al. 2016.
18 months
Other Outcomes (4)
The percentage agreement between blinded raters of the CVS amongst different observers.
18 months
The sensitivity and specificity of combing the CVS with the results of the lumbar puncture.
18 months
A sensitivity analysis, allowing for variation in test performance between sites, using a mixed effects logistic regression model.
18 months
- +1 more other outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Clinically isolated syndrome
Those presenting for diagnositic evaluation of multiple sclerosis, not currently meeting the 2017 McDonald criteria.
Interventions
Current clinical standard practice
Eligibility Criteria
Most participants are expected to have been evaluated by a hospital doctor (usually neurologist or ophthalmologist) at the local site and referred for diagnostic testing to the local MS team.
You may qualify if:
- Aged 18 to 65 years.
- Presentation with a typical clinically isolated syndrome (Thompson et al. 2017) for diagnostic evaluation of MS.
You may not qualify if:
- Fulfils the diagnosis of MS, as defined by the 2017 revision of McDonald diagnostic criteria (Thompson et al. 2017).
- Unwilling or unable to comply with the requirements of this protocol including the presence of any condition (physical, mental, or social) that, in the opinion of the PI, is likely to affect the participant's ability to comply with the study protocol.
- Unable to provide informed consent.
- Contraindication or inability to undergo MRI due to metal or metal implants, pregnancy, claustrophobia, pain, spasticity, or excessive movement related to tremor.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (4)
Cardiff & Vale University Lhb
Cardiff, United Kingdom
Barts Health Nhs Trust
London, United Kingdom
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
Nottingham, United Kingdom
Oxford University Hospitals Nhs Foundation Trust
Oxford, United Kingdom
Related Publications (2)
Thompson AJ, Banwell BL, Barkhof F, Carroll WM, Coetzee T, Comi G, Correale J, Fazekas F, Filippi M, Freedman MS, Fujihara K, Galetta SL, Hartung HP, Kappos L, Lublin FD, Marrie RA, Miller AE, Miller DH, Montalban X, Mowry EM, Sorensen PS, Tintore M, Traboulsee AL, Trojano M, Uitdehaag BMJ, Vukusic S, Waubant E, Weinshenker BG, Reingold SC, Cohen JA. Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria. Lancet Neurol. 2018 Feb;17(2):162-173. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30470-2. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
PMID: 29275977BACKGROUNDMistry N, Abdel-Fahim R, Samaraweera A, Mougin O, Tallantyre E, Tench C, Jaspan T, Morris P, Morgan PS, Evangelou N. Imaging central veins in brain lesions with 3-T T2*-weighted magnetic resonance imaging differentiates multiple sclerosis from microangiopathic brain lesions. Mult Scler. 2016 Sep;22(10):1289-96. doi: 10.1177/1352458515616700. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
PMID: 26658816BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nikos Evangelou, MD
Clinical Neurology, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 12, 2019
First Posted
July 18, 2019
Study Start
November 6, 2019
Primary Completion
May 1, 2022
Study Completion
November 1, 2022
Last Updated
March 4, 2020
Record last verified: 2019-07