NCT04024969

Brief Summary

There is currently no agreement on the best way to diagnose Multiple Sclerosis (MS). Frequently, people suspected of having MS have a standard MRI scan and undergo a 'lumbar puncture' (a thin needle is inserted between the bones in the lower spine). Patients often report they find it painful and it can cause unintended complications requiring hospitalisations or time off work to recover. Although the fluid taken during a lumbar puncture can show evidence of disease, this is not always the case. Doctors do not find abnormalities in everyone who has MS but some people with conditions that can mimic MS, but need very different treatment, have similar lumbar puncture abnormalities. Both of these problems can lead to misdiagnosis. A new MRI scan allows doctors to see small veins that run through damaged areas of the brain in people with MS. It has been shown that this is a specific finding to MS, seldom seen in other conditions. It is not painful and carries few or no risks. This research aims to change the way people are diagnosed with MS and reduce the number of lumbar punctures used. The investigators will recruit a large number of people from different hospitals whose doctors suspect they may have MS. They will be invited to have the new eight-minute MRI scan. After 18 months, the investigators will find out what diagnosis is eventually reached and compare this to the finding of the new scan. The investigators will then compare the accuracy, speed, costs and acceptability of the different tests needed to make a diagnosis of MS and establish if most lumbar punctures can be replaced by a slightly longer MRI scan. This research could provide the National Health Service with a scientific approach to diagnose MS which is safer, more cost effective and importantly, more acceptable to patients.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
115

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2019

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

4 active sites

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 12, 2019

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 18, 2019

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 6, 2019

Completed
2.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2022

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

March 4, 2020

Status Verified

July 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

2.5 years

First QC Date

June 12, 2019

Last Update Submit

March 2, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

Central Vein SignTranslational NeuroimagingMultiple Sclerosis

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The sensitivity of the central vein sign (CVS) on T2* MRI scan and lumbar puncture with oligoclonal band testing at diagnosing MS at the time of the patients' first presentation.

    The reference standard for both tests will be clinical diagnosis 18 months after recruitment. The sensitivity of each test will be reported separately along with 95% confidence intervals. The sensitivity of the tests will be compared using McNemar's test for paired proportions.

    18 months

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • The specificity of the central vein sign (CVS) on T2* MRI scan and lumbar puncture with oligoclonal band testing at diagnosing MS at the time of the patients' first presentation.

    18 months

  • The sensitivity and specificity of the 'rule of six' proposed in Mistry et al. 2016.

    18 months

Other Outcomes (4)

  • The percentage agreement between blinded raters of the CVS amongst different observers.

    18 months

  • The sensitivity and specificity of combing the CVS with the results of the lumbar puncture.

    18 months

  • A sensitivity analysis, allowing for variation in test performance between sites, using a mixed effects logistic regression model.

    18 months

  • +1 more other outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Clinically isolated syndrome

Those presenting for diagnositic evaluation of multiple sclerosis, not currently meeting the 2017 McDonald criteria.

Diagnostic Test: T2* MRIDiagnostic Test: Lumbar puncture to test for presence of unmatched oligoclonal bands

Interventions

T2* MRIDIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Research T2\* weighted MRI sequence

Clinically isolated syndrome

Current clinical standard practice

Clinically isolated syndrome

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Most participants are expected to have been evaluated by a hospital doctor (usually neurologist or ophthalmologist) at the local site and referred for diagnostic testing to the local MS team.

You may qualify if:

  • Aged 18 to 65 years.
  • Presentation with a typical clinically isolated syndrome (Thompson et al. 2017) for diagnostic evaluation of MS.

You may not qualify if:

  • Fulfils the diagnosis of MS, as defined by the 2017 revision of McDonald diagnostic criteria (Thompson et al. 2017).
  • Unwilling or unable to comply with the requirements of this protocol including the presence of any condition (physical, mental, or social) that, in the opinion of the PI, is likely to affect the participant's ability to comply with the study protocol.
  • Unable to provide informed consent.
  • Contraindication or inability to undergo MRI due to metal or metal implants, pregnancy, claustrophobia, pain, spasticity, or excessive movement related to tremor.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (4)

Cardiff & Vale University Lhb

Cardiff, United Kingdom

RECRUITING

Barts Health Nhs Trust

London, United Kingdom

RECRUITING

Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust

Nottingham, United Kingdom

RECRUITING

Oxford University Hospitals Nhs Foundation Trust

Oxford, United Kingdom

RECRUITING

Related Publications (2)

  • Thompson AJ, Banwell BL, Barkhof F, Carroll WM, Coetzee T, Comi G, Correale J, Fazekas F, Filippi M, Freedman MS, Fujihara K, Galetta SL, Hartung HP, Kappos L, Lublin FD, Marrie RA, Miller AE, Miller DH, Montalban X, Mowry EM, Sorensen PS, Tintore M, Traboulsee AL, Trojano M, Uitdehaag BMJ, Vukusic S, Waubant E, Weinshenker BG, Reingold SC, Cohen JA. Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria. Lancet Neurol. 2018 Feb;17(2):162-173. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30470-2. Epub 2017 Dec 21.

    PMID: 29275977BACKGROUND
  • Mistry N, Abdel-Fahim R, Samaraweera A, Mougin O, Tallantyre E, Tench C, Jaspan T, Morris P, Morgan PS, Evangelou N. Imaging central veins in brain lesions with 3-T T2*-weighted magnetic resonance imaging differentiates multiple sclerosis from microangiopathic brain lesions. Mult Scler. 2016 Sep;22(10):1289-96. doi: 10.1177/1352458515616700. Epub 2015 Dec 10.

    PMID: 26658816BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Multiple Sclerosis

Interventions

Magnetic Resonance Myelography

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Demyelinating Autoimmune Diseases, CNSAutoimmune Diseases of the Nervous SystemNervous System DiseasesDemyelinating DiseasesAutoimmune DiseasesImmune System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

MyelographyNeuroradiographyNeuroimagingDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosisRadiographyMagnetic Resonance ImagingTomographyDiagnostic Techniques, NeurologicalInvestigative Techniques

Study Officials

  • Nikos Evangelou, MD

    Clinical Neurology, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Research and Innovation

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
OTHER
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 12, 2019

First Posted

July 18, 2019

Study Start

November 6, 2019

Primary Completion

May 1, 2022

Study Completion

November 1, 2022

Last Updated

March 4, 2020

Record last verified: 2019-07

Locations