Study Stopped
Difficulties in recruiting eligible participants
Parafricta Bootees vs UK Standard Care to Prevent Heel Pressure Ulcers
Parafricta Bootees Compared to UK Standard Care to Prevent Heel Pressure Ulcers: a Multicentre Pragmatic Randomised Controlled Trial With Blinded Assessment at Three Days and at Fourteen Days.
1 other identifier
interventional
31
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This randomised study will assess whether Parafricta bootees, when used in addition to normal standard care, can reduce the incidence of heel PUs in patients at very high risk of skin breakdown. The participant group will be hospital inpatients at high risk of PUs (Waterlow score of 20 or more) who are bedbound and do not have existing heel PUs. The participants will be randomised to an intervention arm using Parafricta plus standard care, or a control arm of standard care only. The primary outcome is incidence of heel PUs at day 3. Secondary outcomes are incidence of PUs at day 14, length of stay, severity of PUs, patient acceptability of device, cost-effectiveness.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2017
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 26, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 30, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 16, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 18, 2019
CompletedJuly 18, 2019
July 1, 2019
6 months
July 16, 2019
July 17, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Incidence of heel pressure ulcers of EPUAP NPUAP/PPPIA Category 1 or above
Incidence of heel pressure ulcers of EPUAP NPUAP/PPPIA Category 1 or above on Visit 2 (Day 3), assessed by examination of digital images by two independent expert assessors who are blinded to the participants' allocated treatment.
Day 3
Study Arms (2)
Standard care alone
NO INTERVENTIONPatients randomly allocated to standard care will be cared for on the appropriate mattress indicated for use in that participating centre according to local policy e.g. foam mattress or dynamic air mattress. Standard care may also include a mattress overlay or the use of a wedge or pillows to maintain the position of the participant, or pressure offloading boots on the foot if the need arises during the study period.
Parafricta bootees plus standard care
EXPERIMENTALPatients randomly allocated to Parafricta plus standard care will be cared for on the appropriate mattress as above and care may possibly include a mattress overlay or the use of a wedge or pillows. Participants will in addition be issued with Parafricta bootees (one pair and up to two spare pairs). The patient and clinical staff and the patient's carers will be instructed in the use of Parafricta bootees, which are intended to be worn throughout the day and night and removed only for normal daily washing or examination of the patient's feet. Either the slip-on bootees or the Velco-closure bootees will be selected for the participant at the judgment of the clinical ward nurses.
Interventions
Parafricta bootees are a medical device designed to eliminate skin damage due to friction and shear. The basis of Parafricta bootees is a low friction material and bi-layer construction to make the material of the bootee slide on itself when movement of the foot would otherwise bring friction and shear to bear on the skin.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The eligibility criteria for this study at the time of recruitment were:
- Adult of age 18 years or over
- Admitted to secondary care in an in-patient hospital (with no specified interval from admission to hospital to study recruitment)
- Bedbound or unable to walk independently and requiring assistance to transfer to a chair
- 'Very high' risk group for pressure ulceration (defined by a Waterlow Score of 20 or more)
- No existing heel pressure ulcers of EPUAP/NPUAP/PPPIA Category 1 or above or any other type of wound on the feet.
- Patient was not being treated with pressure offloading boots.
- Patient was not being treated with a heel cast.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with a single or double lower limb amputation were not eligible to participate in the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Cedar, Cardiff & Vale University Health Board
Cardiff, CF14 4UJ, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Grace Carolan-Rees, Prof
Cedar, Cardiff & Vale University Health Board
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Assessment of the primary study outcome was by independent blinded assessment of digital photographic images, by assessors who did not undertake study visits and who were unaware of the participant's allocated treatment.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor Grace Carolan-Rees
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 16, 2019
First Posted
July 18, 2019
Study Start
October 26, 2017
Primary Completion
April 30, 2018
Study Completion
April 30, 2018
Last Updated
July 18, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-07