Randomized Comparison of Radiation Exposure in Coronary Angiography Between Right Conventional and Left Distal Radial Artery Approach
DOSE
1 other identifier
interventional
100
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Randomized comparison of radiation exposure in coronary angiography between right conventional and left distal radial artery approach
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2019
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 16, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 18, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2020
CompletedJuly 18, 2019
July 1, 2019
Same day
July 16, 2019
July 17, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Radiation dose of the operator (µSv)
Radiation dose (µSv) of the operator's head, hand, and body will be compared between right conventional radial artery approach and left snuffbox approach group.
Through procedure completion, up to 6 hours
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Fluoroscopy time for coronary angiography (second)
Through procedure completion, up to 6 hours
Dose-area product (mGy*cm2)
Through procedure completion, up to 6 hours
Success rate of radial puncture (%)
Through procedure completion, up to 6 hours
Cannulation time (second)
Through procedure completion, up to 6 hours
Hemostasis duration (minute)
During hospitalization, up to 1 month
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Right conventional radial approach
PLACEBO COMPARATORAfter local anesthesia on right wrist area with lidocaine hydrochloride using a 26 gauge needle, the puncture is performed using a 20 gauge needle with the through-and-through puncture technique or a 21 gauge open needle with anterior wall puncture technique. After the successful puncture, 0.025-inch straight wire or 0.018-inch hair wire are inserted, followed by insertion of the 5Fr. radial sheath (Prelude® Radial; Merit medical, UT, USA or Radifocus® Introducer II or Glidesheath Slender®; Terumo Corporation, Tokyo, Japan).
Left distal radial approach
ACTIVE COMPARATORAfter local anesthesia on left anatomical snuffbox area with lidocaine hydrochloride using a 26 gauge needle, the puncture is performed using a 20 gauge needle with the through-and-through puncture technique or a 21 gauge open needle with anterior wall puncture technique. After the successful puncture, 0.025-inch straight wire or 0.018-inch hair wire are inserted, followed by insertion of the 5Fr. radial sheath (Prelude® Radial; Merit medical, UT, USA or Radifocus® Introducer II or Glidesheath Slender®; Terumo Corporation, Tokyo, Japan).
Interventions
We will perform coronary angiography through a Judkins 5 French diagnostic catheter and will take a basic view. At the end of the examination, the radial sheath is removed and the right conventional radial approach is performed for about 4 hours and the left snuffbox approach for about 2 hours using the compressive bandage method. The hemostatic device will use ez ClotRadial® (SOYEON medical Co., Ltd., Wonju, Korea).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients who are a palpable right radial artery and left distal radial artery
- The decision to participate voluntarily in this study and the written consent of the patient
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who are not palpable right radial artery and left distal radial artery
- Patients who have arteriovenous fistula
- Patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction
- Patients who need to perform coronary angiography via femoral approach, such as shock state
- Patients who have atrioventricular block on the electrocardiogram
- Patients who have a plan to perform Ergonovine provocation test
- Patients who need percutaneous coronary intervention
- Patients who are not appropriate for this study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Yongcheol Kim, MD
Department of Cardiology, Chonnam National University Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 16, 2019
First Posted
July 18, 2019
Study Start
August 1, 2019
Primary Completion
August 1, 2019
Study Completion
December 1, 2020
Last Updated
July 18, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share