Positive End-expiratory Pressure Effects to Predict Fluid Responsiveness
PEEP-TEST
1 other identifier
interventional
66
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Volume expansion is one of the main treatments for shock. A test to predict the effectiveness of volume expansion prior to administration would avoid the need for excess treatment if it proves to be unnecessary.PEEP test would be an easy alternative to the tests used in current practice.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2019
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 8, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 18, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 13, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2021
CompletedFebruary 11, 2026
February 1, 2026
1.6 years
July 8, 2019
February 9, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Ability of the PEP test to detect a preload-dependency condition.
The primary endpoint will be the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve constructed to describe the ability of the PEP test to detect a preload-dependency condition.
At the end of the hospitalization in intensive care unit (1 month maximum)
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Relationship between the ability of the PEEP test to detect a preload-dependancy and secondly the PEEP delta induced by the test
At the end of the hospitalization in intensive care unit (1 month maximum)
Ability of the PEP test to detect a response to volume expansion.
At the end of the hospitalization in intensive care unit (1 month maximum)
Study Arms (1)
70 patients, one arm
EXPERIMENTALAll patients benefits of a passive leg raising test and a PEEP test to compare these two tests.
Interventions
The PEEP test will consist of lowering the PEEP level to 5 cmH2O for a maximum of 2 minutes and a minimum of 1 minute. Patients will be included if the physicians who care for them have decided to set a baseline PEEP level ≥10 cmH2O.
The VenArt System for estimating cardiac output (a patch stuck to the surface of the neck and a saturation sensor placed at the tip of a finger).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Coverage by a health insurance scheme
- Patient under mechanical invasive ventilation (tracheal intubation)
- PEEP level ≥10 cmH2O
- Cardiac flow monitoring device in place by the PiCCO2 system (Pulsion Medical Systems, Feldkirch, Germany).
- Ikorus urinary catheter in place
- Decision by the doctors in charge of carrying out a passive leg raising test and / or a volume expansion
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnancy
- Participation in another interventional study
- Patients under the protection of justice
- Thoracic drainage (preventing PEP changes from inducing intrathoracic and transpulmonary pressure changes from their hemodynamic effects).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Dr Alexandra Beurton
Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, Val de Marne, France
Dr Alexandra Beurton
Paris, 75651, France
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 8, 2019
First Posted
July 18, 2019
Study Start
December 13, 2019
Primary Completion
July 1, 2021
Study Completion
July 1, 2021
Last Updated
February 11, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share