NCT04014868

Brief Summary

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is a major cause of disability and mortality worldwide. This disease progressively leads to dyspnea and exercise capacity impairment. Pulmonary rehabilitation teaches chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients to cope effectively with the systemic effects of the disease and improves exercise capacity, dyspnea and quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. However, the best training modality remains unknown. Physiological studies highlight the benefit of high intensity endurance training. However, many patients do not tolerate such a training due to ventilatory limitation and dyspnea. Therefore, a strategy to reduce dyspnea would allow a greater physiological muscle solicitation and improvement. Thus, many studies focus on means to increase exercise tolerance in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Nasal high flow delivers heated and humidified high flow air (up to 60 L/min) through nasal cannula providing physiological benefits such as positive airway pressure and carbon dioxide washout. It can be used in association with oxygen and offers the advantage to overtake the patient's inspiratory flow, providing a stable inspired fraction of oxygen. Nasal high flow has widely been studied in pediatric and adult intensive care units and seems better than conventional oxygen therapy and as effective as noninvasive ventilation with regards to mortality to treat hypoxemic acute respiratory failure. More recently, nasal-high flow has been shown to improve endurance exercise capacity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. However, the underlying physiological mechanisms have not been yet elucidated but may help to optimise the utilization of the device. Therefore, the primary objective of this study is to assess the respiratory physiological effects nasal high-flow during-exercise in stable patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Secondary objectives are to assess the effects nasal high-flow during-exercise on endurance capacity, respiratory drive, dynamic hyperinflation, cardiorespiratory pattern and muscular metabolism.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
14

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable chronic-obstructive-pulmonary-disease

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2019

Typical duration for not_applicable chronic-obstructive-pulmonary-disease

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 8, 2019

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 10, 2019

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 22, 2019

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2021

Completed
9 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 10, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

March 17, 2022

Status Verified

March 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

1.9 years

First QC Date

July 8, 2019

Last Update Submit

March 16, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseExerciseNasal high flowMuscle

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Transdiaphragmatic pressure-time product using a single-use catheter with two balloons to measure gastric and esophageal pressures.

    Transdiaphragmatic pressure is calculated as gastric pressure minus oesophageal pressure. The outcome will be continuously recorded during the two constant workload exercise testing. Results will be shown at time limit and iso time (defined as time limit of the shortest test).

    The outcome will be continuously recorded during the two constant workload exercise testing. The 2 tests will be performed the same day for a total time frame of 3hours.

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • Ventilatory drive using diaphragmatic electromyogram through the same single-use catheter used for transdiaphragmatic pressure (which is provided with 6 pairs of electrodes).

    The outcome will be continuously recorded during the two constant workload exercise testing. The 2 tests will be performed the same day for a total time frame of 3hours.

  • Ventilatory efficiency using indirect calorimetry

    The outcome will be continuously recorded during the two constant workload exercise testing. The 2 tests will be performed the same day for a total time frame of 3hours.

  • Dynamic hyperinflation using the fall in during-exercise inspiratory capacity

    The outcome will be recorded during the two tests. The 2 tests will be performed the same day for a total time frame of 3hours.

  • Transcutaneous arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure using capnography.

    The outcome will be continuously recorded during the two constant workload exercise testing. The 2 tests will be performed the same day for a total time frame of 3hours.

  • Dyspnea during the constant workload exercise testing using modified Borg scale (0-10).

    The outcome will be recorded during the two tests. The 2 tests will be performed the same day for a total time frame of 3hours.

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Nasal high-flow

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients will perform a constant workload exercise testing (75% of the maximal workload achieved during a previously performed incremental cardiopulmonary exercise testing) with active nasal high-flow : Flow : 30 L/min; Temperature : 34°C; The device will be out of sight of the patient. The device allow for oxygen supplementation (fitting on the back of the device). Usual oxygen prescription (if any) will be adjusted to reach a transcutaneous oxygen saturation superior to 90%. A second fitting will be placed just before the nasal canula to allow for oxygen supplementation during the sham nasal high-flow (device turned OFF) test. Due to the cross-over design of the study, all patients will perform both interventions.

Device: Nasal high-flow

Sham nasal high-flow

SHAM COMPARATOR

Patients will perform a constant workload exercise testing (75% of the maximal workload achieved during a previously performed incremental cardiopulmonary exercise testing) with a sham nasal high-flow : The procedure will be exactly the same but the device (out of sight of the patient) will be turned OFF. Oxygen supplementation will be possible through the fitting placed just before the nasal canula. Due to the cross-over design of the study, all patients will perform both interventions.

Other: Sham nasal high-flow

Interventions

See arm description.

Nasal high-flow

See arm description.

Sham nasal high-flow

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age \> 18years and \< 80years;
  • Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Gold III-IV;
  • Stable (no exacerbation) in the past 4 weeks;
  • Referred for pulmonary rehabilitation (no cardiac, neurological, orthopedic, neuromuscular, psychological or psychiatric contra indication).
  • Tracheostomy;
  • Nasal high flow intolerance;
  • Pregnancy or likely to be;
  • Unable to consent;
  • Patients under guardianship.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

ADIR Association

Bois-Guillaume, 76230, France

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveMotor Activity

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Lung Diseases, ObstructiveLung DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesChronic DiseaseDisease AttributesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsBehavior

Study Officials

  • Antoine Cuvelier, MD, PhD, Prof

    Normandie University, UNIROUEN, UPRES EA 3830, Haute Normandie Research and Biomedical Innovation, Rouen, France ; Pulmonary, Thoracic Oncology and Respiratory Intensive Care Department, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Jean-François Muir, MD, Prof

    ADIR Association, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France ; Normandie University, UNIROUEN, UPRES EA 3830, Haute Normandie Research and Biomedical Innovation, Rouen, France

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Maxime Patout, MD, Msc

    Normandie University, UNIROUEN, UPRES EA 3830, Haute Normandie Research and Biomedical Innovation, Rouen, France ; Pulmonary, Thoracic Oncology and Respiratory Intensive Care Department, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Tristan Bonnevie, Msc

    UADIR Association, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France ; niversity, UNIROUEN, UPRES EA 3830, Haute Normandie Research and Biomedical Innovation, Rouen, France

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Francis-Edouard Gravier, Msc

    ADIR Association, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France ; Normandie University, UNIROUEN, UPRES EA 3830, Haute Normandie Research and Biomedical Innovation, Rouen, France

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Masking Details
The nasal high-flow device will be out of sight of the patients and will not be switched ON. The oxygen connection at the exit of the device will be obstructed. If the patient needs supplementary oxygen during-exercise, it will be provided through the fitting located just before the nasal canula (see Arms, Experimental: Nasal high-flow).
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Model Details: Single-blind randomized cross-over study.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 8, 2019

First Posted

July 10, 2019

Study Start

November 22, 2019

Primary Completion

October 1, 2021

Study Completion

October 10, 2021

Last Updated

March 17, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-03

Locations