Breath and Air Stacking on Respiratory Mechanics in Tracheostomized Patients
Comparison Between Breath Stacking and Air Stacking on Respiratory Mechanics and Ventilatory Pattern in Tracheostomized Patients: Randomized Crossover Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The researchers hypothesized that the aid of the resuscitator by the technique Air Stacking increase lung volume, promoting increased lung compliance and improvement of the ventilatory pattern. In addition, Air Stacking does not depend on patient collaboration. The objective of this study was to compare the effects of breath stacking and air stacking techniques on respiratory mechanics and ventilatory pattern in patients admitted to the ICU
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2018
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 25, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 18, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 14, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 4, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 9, 2019
CompletedJuly 9, 2019
July 1, 2019
8 months
July 4, 2019
July 4, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Static compliance of respiratory system
Compliance was assessed through the occlusion maneuver at the end of inspiration, considering tidal volume, plateau pressure and PEEP. Three measurements were taken at each moment, the mean being used.
Baseline (before) and immediately after Breath Stacking or Air Stacking
Total Resistance of respiratory system
The total resistance of the respiratory system was evaluated through the occlusion maneuver at the end of the inspiration, considering the resistive pressure, measured by the difference between the maximum plateau pressure. Three measurements were taken at each moment, the mean being used.
Baseline (before) and immediately after Breath Stacking or Air Stacking
Study Arms (2)
Breath Stacking
ACTIVE COMPARATORBreath stacking: patients were connected to a unidirectional valve coupled to artificial airway (tracheostomy), with bacteriological filter. The ventilator was coupled to the unidirectional valve to measure inspiratory volume mobilized in each cycle and a connection to adapt a manometer. The patient performed successive inspirations for a maximum period of 30 seconds or until unidirectional valve opening or volume increase was observed for 2 consecutive efforts. Ten cycles of the technique were performed, with an interval of 30 seconds.
Air Stacking
EXPERIMENTALAir stacking: the same system of monitoring and adaptation of the ventilometer and manometer was carried out. A manual resuscitator coupled to a unidirectional valve was used, both connected to the tracheostomy, with a filter interface. Slow and successive inspirations were performed through slow compression of the resuscitator until the maximum inspiratory pressure reached 40 cmH2O. Ten cycles of the technique were performed, with an interval of 30 seconds.
Interventions
Patients were connected to a unidirectional valve coupled to artificial airway (tracheostomy), with bacteriological filter. The ventilator was coupled to the unidirectional valve to measure inspiratory volume mobilized in each cycle and a connection to adapt a manometer. The patient performed successive inspirations for a maximum period of 30 seconds or until unidirectional valve opening or volume increase was observed for 2 consecutive efforts. Ten cycles of the technique were performed, with an interval of 30 seconds.
The same system of monitoring and adaptation of the ventilometer and manometer was carried out. A manual resuscitator coupled to a unidirectional valve was used, both connected to the tracheostomy, with a filter interface. Slow and successive inspirations were performed through slow compression of the resuscitator until the maximum inspiratory pressure reached 40 cmH2O. Ten cycles of the technique were performed, with an interval of 30 seconds.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients without mechanical ventilation for more than 72 hours
- Mucus hypersecretion (defined as the need for suctioning \< 2-h intervals)
You may not qualify if:
- bronchospasm.
- Pleural effusion or pneumothorax undrained.
- Bronchopleural or tracheoesophageal fistula.
- Neuromuscular disease.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Luciano M Chicayban
Campos dos Goytacazes, Rio de Janeiro, 28015150, Brazil
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Laboratório de Pesquisa em Fisioterapia Pneumofuncional e Intensiva (LAPEFIPI)
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 4, 2019
First Posted
July 9, 2019
Study Start
February 25, 2018
Primary Completion
October 18, 2018
Study Completion
May 14, 2019
Last Updated
July 9, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-07