Patient Education Using 3D Printed Model
Effect of Multimodal Patient Education With a Personalized 3D Printed Model in Patients With Severe Periarticular Ankle Fractures
1 other identifier
interventional
28
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Complex high energy fractures of the lower extremity are life changing injuries and are known to be associated with poor functional outcome post operatively. The list of potential post-operative complications associated with these injuries is long, and the worst of these fractures can even be limb threatening. One of the most difficult and prevalent post-operative issues this patient population faces is chronic pain and its association to opioid addiction, which is currently an epidemic across North America. These individuals not only present with physical insult but psychological trauma as well, which also greatly affects these patients post-operatively. Properly educating the patient about their injury and the process that they will embark on can greatly empower the patient as they begin their journey of rehabilitation. This process can hopefully mute or silence some of these modifiable risk factors predisposing patients to poor functional outcomes and chronic pain. The investigators also hope to help them initiate/develop coping strategies to better overcome the many obstacles these patients face and to do so using 3D printing. 3D printed models have not only been demonstrated to be valuable in orthopaedics, when it comes to educating patients about their disease and associated interventions, but many other specialties as well; such as: cardiac surgery, urology, and general surgery. Literature suggest that often little is understood or retained by the patient following a patient consent with regards to their injury, potential complications, interventions to be undertaken, as well as the rehabilitation process to follow. By providing the patient with a 3D printed model of their fracture while educating them pre-/post-operatively, the investigators hope they will better understand the aforementioned, often forgotten points, indirectly yielding better overall patient satisfaction, patient outcomes and pain scores.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2019
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 12, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 5, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2020
CompletedJuly 5, 2019
July 1, 2019
1 year
June 12, 2019
July 3, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Musculoskeletal Outcomes Data Evaluation and Management Scale (MODEMS) Expectations Questionnaire (expectations)
The expectations of a patient in regards to their ankle surgery, this questionnaire is on a Likert scale from 1 to 5 with 1 indicating a worse score.
Change between pre-operative and 3 months after the patients operation
Musculoskeletal Outcomes Data Evaluation and Management Scale (MODEMS) Expectations Questionnaire (satisfaction)
The satisfaction of a patient in regards to their ankle surgery, this questionnaire is on a Likert scale from 1 to 5 with 1 indicating a worse score.
3 months post-operative
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Visual Analogue Score (VAS) for Pain
Change between pre-operative to 6 months post-operative, this questionnaire is on a Likert scale from 1 to 5 with 1 indicating a worse score.
SF-12
Change between pre-operative to 6 months post-operative
Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM)
Change between pre-operative to 6 months post-operative
Study Arms (2)
Intervention Group
EXPERIMENTAL3D model to be printed and used as teaching tool to discuss injury with patient as well as its associated long-term outcomes and potential complications. The operative plan will also be reviewed with the patient using the model as well as post-operative course (ie rehabilitation)
Control Group
NO INTERVENTIONThe CT image will be shown to the patients along with teaching
Interventions
A 3D model of the patients ankle fracture will be printed and used as a teaching tool to discuss long-term outcomes and potential complications.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- periarticular injury involving the plafond, calcaneus or talus that requires open reduction and internal fixation
- Patient must have a completed CT scan as part of their pre-operative planning protocol
You may not qualify if:
- open fracture
- patient with known psychiatric history (depression, borderline personality disorder, bipolar etc)
- prior fracture fixation of the same ankle or foot
- diabetic neuropathy/Charcot foot
- dementia or other cognitive comorbidities (ie stroke etc)
- no primary address
- patient who were not independent mobilizers prior to injury
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Karl Lalonde, MD
Clinical Investigator
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 12, 2019
First Posted
July 5, 2019
Study Start
July 1, 2019
Primary Completion
July 1, 2020
Study Completion
December 1, 2020
Last Updated
July 5, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-07