Whole-body MRI in Pediatric Hodgkin's Lymphoma
Whole-body MRI for Initial Staging, Early Response Assessment and Restaging After Completion of Therapy in Pediatric Hodgkin's Lymphoma.
1 other identifier
observational
75
4 countries
8
Brief Summary
Background: The assessment of extent of disease (staging) and response to therapy (restaging) is performed with computed tomography (CT) scan, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET scan) or integrated FDG-PET/CT. Whole-body MRI with diffusion weighted imaging (WB-MRI with DWIBS) is a radiation-free method which allows imaging of the body with excellent soft tissue contrast in a single examination and could be an attractive alternative to FDG-PET and CT for the staging and restaging of malignant lymphomas in children. Aim of the study: The aims of this study are to compare the diagnostic performance of whole-body MRI (including DWIBS) to FDG-PET/CT and/or CT for the initial staging, early response assessment and restaging after completion of therapy in children with Hodgkin's lymphoma. Study design: Patients eligible for enrollment in this multicenter, prospective, diagnostic cohort study are children aged 8-18 years, with histologically confirmed Hodgkin's lymphoma, who are treated according to the EuroNet-PHL-C1 protocol (or trial with similar imaging strategy) in one of the participating centers. Patients will undergo WB-MRI in addition to the protocolar imaging routinely done (FDG-PET(/CT) and CT scan) at 3 time-points: at initial staging, after 2 chemotherapy cycles and at end of treatment. The investigators expect to enrol 75 patients in a 3 year study period. Staging and restaging results of WB-MRI (according to the Ann Arbor and Cheson classification, respectively) will be compared to those of FDG-PET(/CT) and CT. Clinical and radiological follow-up after 6 months will be used to solve any disagreements between FDG-PET, CT and WB-MRI. Additionally, the investigators will collect 3 year follow-up clinical data and data on follow-up imaging from the hospital charts of the patients, to better assess the prognostic value of FDG-PET and WB-MRI.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Jun 2011
Longer than P75 for all trials
8 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 2, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 2, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2020
CompletedNovember 3, 2020
November 1, 2020
5.5 years
July 2, 2013
November 2, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Staging (Ann Arbor)
The primary outcome parameter will be the clinical stage according to WB-MRI (including DWIBS) and according to FDG-PET/CT. This clinical stage will be determined according to the Ann Arbor classification system for initial staging.
Day 1
Early treatment response assessment (Cheson criteria)
The primary outcome parameter will be the clinical stage according to WB-MRI (including DWIBS) and according to FDG-PET/CT. This clinical stage will be determined according to the Cheson criteria for early response assessment.
2 months
Restaging at end of therapy (Cheson criteria)
The primary outcome parameter will be the clinical stage according to WB-MRI (including DWIBS) and according to FDG-PET/CT. This clinical stage will be determined according to the Cheson criteria for restaging.
6 months
Follow up for 3 years after end of treatment
The percentage of relapse of Hodgkin lymphoma in this study cohort will be assessed by a 3-year follow-up of clinical and imaging data, and the percentage of true- versus false-positives on WB-MRI at end of treatment compared to PET/CT using this follow-up.
3 years
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Image quality
Day 1, 2 months, 6 months
Interobserver variability of WB-MRI for staging, early response assessment and restaging at end of therapy
Day 1, 2 months, 6 months
Study Arms (1)
Pediatric Hodgkin's lymphoma
Children with newly diagnosed Hodgkin's lymphoma
Eligibility Criteria
Patients, aged 8-18 years, with newly diagnosed Hodgkin's lymphoma, who will undergo PET/CT for staging, early response assessment and restaging at completion of therapy (imaging standards according to the Euronet-PHL-C1 protocol).
You may qualify if:
- male or female patients
- age: 8-18 years
- histologically proven Hodgkin's lymphoma
- enrolled in the EuroNet-PHL-C1 trial (or trial with comparable imaging strategy)
- patients scheduled for a FDG-PET/CT and/or CT of the body for initial staging, early response assessment (after two cycles of chemotherapy) or restaging
- participant's parents (and participants \>12 years of age) must willingly give written informed consent prior to each MRI
- whole-body MRI/DWIBS has to be performed within 15 days before or after FDG-PET/CT or CT and the initial staging MRI should be performed before therapy has been started
You may not qualify if:
- patients with a general contraindication for MRI (including cardiovascular pacemakers, claustrophobia)
- patients who have had a previous malignancy
- patients who are pregnant or nursing
- patients in whom therapy has already started after FDG-PET/CT and/or CT and before the initial WB-MRI/DWIBS could be performed
- apparent signs of resistance during MR examination
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- UMC Utrechtlead
- Stichting Kinderen Kankervrij (KiKa)collaborator
Study Sites (8)
LKH-Universitätsklinikum Graz
Graz, Austria
Ospedale Giannina Gaslini
Genova, Italy
Academic Medical Center Amsterdam
Amsterdam, Netherlands
VU University Medical Center
Amsterdam, Netherlands
University Medical Center St. Radboud
Nijmegen, Netherlands
Erasmus Medical Center
Rotterdam, Netherlands
University Medical Center Utrecht
Utrecht, Netherlands
HUMI Vall d'Hebron
Barcelona, Spain
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Rutger AJ Nievelstein, MD PhD
UMC Utrecht
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 2, 2013
First Posted
July 2, 2019
Study Start
June 1, 2011
Primary Completion
December 1, 2016
Study Completion
September 1, 2020
Last Updated
November 3, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-11