NCT04002037

Brief Summary

Trigger finger is a common cause of hand pain and dysfunction. Its due to chronic inflammation of the flexor tendon that leads to a pulley system mismatch. Historically it has been managed either conservatively with corticosteroid injections or through a surgical release of the A1 pulley. Several corticosteroids have been used for injection- dexamethasone, methylprednisolone, triamcinolone, betamethasone, paramethasone, etc. The purpose of out study is to determine if a 0.5 cc injection of Triamcinolone 40 mg/mL will be the most effective steroid injection for the non-surgical treatment. Approximately 200 subjects will be enrolled and randomized to one of three treatment arms: Triamcinolone 40mg/mL, Triamcinolone 10mg/mL and Soluble dexamethasone 4mg/mL. Treatment success will be defined as lack of conversion to surgical treatment, or no desire to proceed with surgery during study period (3 months).

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
95

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2019

Longer than P75 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 21, 2019

Completed
4 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 25, 2019

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 28, 2019

Completed
2.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 19, 2022

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2023

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

June 26, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

June 26, 2024

Status Verified

June 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

2.9 years

First QC Date

June 21, 2019

Results QC Date

December 4, 2023

Last Update Submit

June 5, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Trigger Finger

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (9)

  • Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH)

    The patient will be asked to complete a questionnaire with questions related to their hand. Their answers will be scored on a scale of 0-100 with 0 being no disability and 100 being the highest level of disability.

    6 Weeks

  • Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH)

    The patient will be asked to complete a questionnaire with questions related to their hand. Their answers will be scored on a scale of 0-100 with 0 being no disability and 100 being the highest level of disability.

    12 Weeks

  • Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH)

    The patient will be asked to complete a questionnaire with questions related to their hand. Their answers will be scored on a scale of 0-100 with 0 being no disability and 100 being the highest level of disability.

    6 Month

  • Pain Visual Analog Score (VAS)

    The patient will be asked to report their pain on a scale of 0 - 10 using the Visual Analog Scale with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain the patient can imagine.

    6 Weeks

  • Pain Visual Analog Score (VAS)

    The patient will be asked to report their pain on a scale of 0 - 10 using the Visual Analog Scale with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain the patient can imagine.

    12 Weeks

  • Pain Visual Analog Score (VAS)

    The patient will be asked to report their pain on a scale of 0 - 10 using the Visual Analog Scale with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain the patient can imagine.

    6 Month

  • Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity Scores

    PROMIS Physical Function - Upper Extremity is a self-reported performance measure assessing physical function of the upper extremity focusing on nine activities that require use of the upper extremity including shoulder, arm, and hand activities. Responses are as follows: 5 = Without any difficulty; 4 = With a little difficulty; 3=With some difficulty; 2=With much difficulty; and 1=Unable to do. The PROMIS Upper Extremity assessment evaluates upper extremity function, with raw scores typically ranging from 8 to 40, depending on the specific form used. These raw scores are converted to T-scores using a standardized table, with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. These T-scores range from 15 to 61. A higher T-score indicates better upper extremity function, while a lower T-score signifies greater impairment.

    6 Weeks

  • Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity Scores

    PROMIS Physical Function - Upper Extremity is a self-reported performance measure assessing physical function of the upper extremity focusing on nine activities that require use of the upper extremity including shoulder, arm, and hand activities. Responses are as follows: 5 = Without any difficulty; 4 = With a little difficulty; 3=With some difficulty; 2=With much difficulty; and 1=Unable to do. The PROMIS Upper Extremity assessment evaluates upper extremity function, with raw scores typically ranging from 8 to 40, depending on the specific form used. These raw scores are converted to T-scores using a standardized table, with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. These T-scores range from 15 to 61. A higher T-score indicates better upper extremity function, while a lower T-score signifies greater impairment.

    12 Weeks

  • Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity Scores

    PROMIS Physical Function - Upper Extremity is a self-reported performance measure assessing physical function of the upper extremity focusing on nine activities that require use of the upper extremity including shoulder, arm, and hand activities. Responses are as follows: 5 = Without any difficulty; 4 = With a little difficulty; 3=With some difficulty; 2=With much difficulty; and 1=Unable to do. The PROMIS Upper Extremity assessment evaluates upper extremity function, with raw scores typically ranging from 8 to 40, depending on the specific form used. These raw scores are converted to T-scores using a standardized table, with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. These T-scores range from 15 to 61. A higher T-score indicates better upper extremity function, while a lower T-score signifies greater impairment.

    6 Month

Study Arms (3)

Triamcinolone 40mg/mL

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

A corticosteroid injection of Triamcinolone 40mg/mL will be given to subjects to treat their symptoms of trigger finger.

Drug: Triamcinolone Acetonide 40mg/mL

Triamcinolone 10mg/mL

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

A corticosteroid injection of Triamcinolone 10mg/mL will be given to subjects to treat their symptoms of trigger finger.

Drug: Triamcinolone Acetonide 10mg/mL

Soluble dexamethasone 4mg/mL

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

A corticosteroid injection of Soluble Dexamethasone 4mg/mL will be given to subjects to treat their symptoms of trigger finger.

Drug: Dexamethasone 4 mg/ml

Interventions

Corticosteroid injection will occur up to two times if trigger finger symptoms are not resolved.

Triamcinolone 40mg/mL

Corticosteroid injection will occur up to two times if trigger finger symptoms are not resolved.

Triamcinolone 10mg/mL

Corticosteroid injection will occur up to two times if trigger finger symptoms are not resolved.

Soluble dexamethasone 4mg/mL

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adults aged 18 years and older
  • At least one symptomatic trigger finger
  • Patients recommended to receive corticosteroid injections

You may not qualify if:

  • Previous surgeries/injections for trigger fingers in digit being treated for study
  • Participating in another clinical trial
  • Inability to receive corticosteroid injections (i.e. allergies, adverse reactions, etc.)
  • Unable to sign informed consent
  • Pregnant or plan to become pregnant

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Missouri Health Care

Columbia, Missouri, 65212, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • 1- Wolfe SW, Hotchkiss RN, Pederson WC, Kozin SH, Tendinopathy, in: Green's Operative Hand Surgery, 6th edition, Churchill Livingstone, Chap. 62, p. 5, 2011.

    BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Trigger Finger Disorder

Interventions

Triamcinolone AcetonideDexamethasone

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Tendon EntrapmentTendinopathyMuscular DiseasesMusculoskeletal Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

TriamcinolonePregnadienesPregnanesSteroidsFused-Ring CompoundsPolycyclic CompoundsSteroids, FluorinatedPregnadienetriols

Results Point of Contact

Title
Vicki L Jones
Organization
UMissourri

Study Officials

  • Daniel London, MD

    University of Missouri-Columbia

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor, Orthopaedic Surgery

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 21, 2019

First Posted

June 28, 2019

Study Start

June 25, 2019

Primary Completion

May 19, 2022

Study Completion

January 1, 2023

Last Updated

June 26, 2024

Results First Posted

June 26, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-06

Locations