Study Stopped
Preliminary analysis revealed no difference
Differential Efficacy of Corticosteroid Solutions for Non-Operative Treatment of Digit Flexor Tenosynovitis
1 other identifier
interventional
95
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Trigger finger is a common cause of hand pain and dysfunction. Its due to chronic inflammation of the flexor tendon that leads to a pulley system mismatch. Historically it has been managed either conservatively with corticosteroid injections or through a surgical release of the A1 pulley. Several corticosteroids have been used for injection- dexamethasone, methylprednisolone, triamcinolone, betamethasone, paramethasone, etc. The purpose of out study is to determine if a 0.5 cc injection of Triamcinolone 40 mg/mL will be the most effective steroid injection for the non-surgical treatment. Approximately 200 subjects will be enrolled and randomized to one of three treatment arms: Triamcinolone 40mg/mL, Triamcinolone 10mg/mL and Soluble dexamethasone 4mg/mL. Treatment success will be defined as lack of conversion to surgical treatment, or no desire to proceed with surgery during study period (3 months).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Jun 2019
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 21, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 25, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 28, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 19, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2023
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 26, 2024
CompletedJune 26, 2024
June 1, 2024
2.9 years
June 21, 2019
December 4, 2023
June 5, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (9)
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH)
The patient will be asked to complete a questionnaire with questions related to their hand. Their answers will be scored on a scale of 0-100 with 0 being no disability and 100 being the highest level of disability.
6 Weeks
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH)
The patient will be asked to complete a questionnaire with questions related to their hand. Their answers will be scored on a scale of 0-100 with 0 being no disability and 100 being the highest level of disability.
12 Weeks
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH)
The patient will be asked to complete a questionnaire with questions related to their hand. Their answers will be scored on a scale of 0-100 with 0 being no disability and 100 being the highest level of disability.
6 Month
Pain Visual Analog Score (VAS)
The patient will be asked to report their pain on a scale of 0 - 10 using the Visual Analog Scale with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain the patient can imagine.
6 Weeks
Pain Visual Analog Score (VAS)
The patient will be asked to report their pain on a scale of 0 - 10 using the Visual Analog Scale with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain the patient can imagine.
12 Weeks
Pain Visual Analog Score (VAS)
The patient will be asked to report their pain on a scale of 0 - 10 using the Visual Analog Scale with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain the patient can imagine.
6 Month
Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity Scores
PROMIS Physical Function - Upper Extremity is a self-reported performance measure assessing physical function of the upper extremity focusing on nine activities that require use of the upper extremity including shoulder, arm, and hand activities. Responses are as follows: 5 = Without any difficulty; 4 = With a little difficulty; 3=With some difficulty; 2=With much difficulty; and 1=Unable to do. The PROMIS Upper Extremity assessment evaluates upper extremity function, with raw scores typically ranging from 8 to 40, depending on the specific form used. These raw scores are converted to T-scores using a standardized table, with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. These T-scores range from 15 to 61. A higher T-score indicates better upper extremity function, while a lower T-score signifies greater impairment.
6 Weeks
Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity Scores
PROMIS Physical Function - Upper Extremity is a self-reported performance measure assessing physical function of the upper extremity focusing on nine activities that require use of the upper extremity including shoulder, arm, and hand activities. Responses are as follows: 5 = Without any difficulty; 4 = With a little difficulty; 3=With some difficulty; 2=With much difficulty; and 1=Unable to do. The PROMIS Upper Extremity assessment evaluates upper extremity function, with raw scores typically ranging from 8 to 40, depending on the specific form used. These raw scores are converted to T-scores using a standardized table, with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. These T-scores range from 15 to 61. A higher T-score indicates better upper extremity function, while a lower T-score signifies greater impairment.
12 Weeks
Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity Scores
PROMIS Physical Function - Upper Extremity is a self-reported performance measure assessing physical function of the upper extremity focusing on nine activities that require use of the upper extremity including shoulder, arm, and hand activities. Responses are as follows: 5 = Without any difficulty; 4 = With a little difficulty; 3=With some difficulty; 2=With much difficulty; and 1=Unable to do. The PROMIS Upper Extremity assessment evaluates upper extremity function, with raw scores typically ranging from 8 to 40, depending on the specific form used. These raw scores are converted to T-scores using a standardized table, with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. These T-scores range from 15 to 61. A higher T-score indicates better upper extremity function, while a lower T-score signifies greater impairment.
6 Month
Study Arms (3)
Triamcinolone 40mg/mL
ACTIVE COMPARATORA corticosteroid injection of Triamcinolone 40mg/mL will be given to subjects to treat their symptoms of trigger finger.
Triamcinolone 10mg/mL
ACTIVE COMPARATORA corticosteroid injection of Triamcinolone 10mg/mL will be given to subjects to treat their symptoms of trigger finger.
Soluble dexamethasone 4mg/mL
ACTIVE COMPARATORA corticosteroid injection of Soluble Dexamethasone 4mg/mL will be given to subjects to treat their symptoms of trigger finger.
Interventions
Corticosteroid injection will occur up to two times if trigger finger symptoms are not resolved.
Corticosteroid injection will occur up to two times if trigger finger symptoms are not resolved.
Corticosteroid injection will occur up to two times if trigger finger symptoms are not resolved.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults aged 18 years and older
- At least one symptomatic trigger finger
- Patients recommended to receive corticosteroid injections
You may not qualify if:
- Previous surgeries/injections for trigger fingers in digit being treated for study
- Participating in another clinical trial
- Inability to receive corticosteroid injections (i.e. allergies, adverse reactions, etc.)
- Unable to sign informed consent
- Pregnant or plan to become pregnant
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Missouri Health Care
Columbia, Missouri, 65212, United States
Related Publications (1)
1- Wolfe SW, Hotchkiss RN, Pederson WC, Kozin SH, Tendinopathy, in: Green's Operative Hand Surgery, 6th edition, Churchill Livingstone, Chap. 62, p. 5, 2011.
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Vicki L Jones
- Organization
- UMissourri
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Daniel London, MD
University of Missouri-Columbia
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor, Orthopaedic Surgery
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 21, 2019
First Posted
June 28, 2019
Study Start
June 25, 2019
Primary Completion
May 19, 2022
Study Completion
January 1, 2023
Last Updated
June 26, 2024
Results First Posted
June 26, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-06