NCT04000997

Brief Summary

In severe cases after craniotomy, tracheal intubation is often required, and the removal of tracheal intubation presents certain risks and challenges. Premature removal of the tracheal intubation can lead to failure of extubation and increased proportion of re-intubation, resulting in increased risk of airway injury and hospital-acquired pneumonia, resulting in prolonged hospital stay and even adverse effects on neurological outcomes and mortality. However, delayed extubation can also lead to an increased risk of hospital acquired pneumonia, affecting early recovery and neurological recovery. It can be seen that the accurate evaluation of the possibility of tracheal intubation and the appropriate timing can have a greater impact on the prognosis of patients after craniotomy. However, there are currently no relevant standards or guidelines to guide clinical work. Previous studies have shown that for general critically ill patients, Peak cough flow (PCF) can play a certain role in predicting tracheal intubation, but the results of each study are not consistent. The predictive value of PCF for tracheal intubation and extubation in patients after craniotomy is less relevant. This study intends to use Pneumotachograph to measure the active and passive PCF of patients with extubation, to explore the predictive value of PCF for tracheal intubation after craniotomy, and to provide guidance for the development of clinical extubation decisions.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
785

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2019

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 26, 2019

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 27, 2019

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2019

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 28, 2021

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

October 21, 2024

Status Verified

February 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

1.6 years

First QC Date

June 26, 2019

Last Update Submit

October 18, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

endotracheal tubeextubation successcough peak flowpredictive valuepost-craniotomycritically ill

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Predictive value of CPF for endotracheal extubation

    Failure of extubation refers to re-intubation within 72 hours after extubation

    72h after extubation

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • mortality rates

    in hospital

Study Arms (2)

Failure group

Patients with a failure extubation

Success group

Patients with a successful extubation

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients admitted into ICU ward after craniotomy will be screened. Those ones meeting the including criteria will be included. patients would be grouped by their extubation outcomes.

You may qualify if:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Post- craniotomy
  • ICU LOS ≥ 24h

You may not qualify if:

  • no extubation attempt during the ICU stay;
  • underwent tracheostomy without extubation attempt;
  • pregnant or lactating women;
  • enrolled in other clinical trials;
  • declined to participate in the study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Jianfang Zhou

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100020, China

Location

Related Publications (11)

  • Reis HF, Almeida ML, Silva MF, Rocha Mde S. Extubation failure influences clinical and functional outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injury. J Bras Pneumol. 2013 May-Jun;39(3):330-8. doi: 10.1590/S1806-37132013000300010.

    PMID: 23857695BACKGROUND
  • McCredie VA, Ferguson ND, Pinto RL, Adhikari NK, Fowler RA, Chapman MG, Burrell A, Baker AJ, Cook DJ, Meade MO, Scales DC; Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. Airway Management Strategies for Brain-injured Patients Meeting Standard Criteria to Consider Extubation. A Prospective Cohort Study. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 Jan;14(1):85-93. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201608-620OC.

    PMID: 27870576BACKGROUND
  • Hyde GA, Savage SA, Zarzaur BL, Hart-Hyde JE, Schaefer CB, Croce MA, Fabian TC. Early tracheostomy in trauma patients saves time and money. Injury. 2015 Jan;46(1):110-4. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.08.049. Epub 2014 Sep 16.

    PMID: 25441577BACKGROUND
  • Alali AS, Scales DC, Fowler RA, Mainprize TG, Ray JG, Kiss A, de Mestral C, Nathens AB. Tracheostomy timing in traumatic brain injury: a propensity-matched cohort study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Jan;76(1):70-6; discussion 76-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182a8fd6a.

    PMID: 24368359BACKGROUND
  • Bosel J, Schiller P, Hook Y, Andes M, Neumann JO, Poli S, Amiri H, Schonenberger S, Peng Z, Unterberg A, Hacke W, Steiner T. Stroke-related Early Tracheostomy versus Prolonged Orotracheal Intubation in Neurocritical Care Trial (SETPOINT): a randomized pilot trial. Stroke. 2013 Jan;44(1):21-8. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.669895. Epub 2012 Nov 29.

    PMID: 23204058BACKGROUND
  • Herritt B, Chaudhuri D, Thavorn K, Kubelik D, Kyeremanteng K. Early vs. late tracheostomy in intensive care settings: Impact on ICU and hospital costs. J Crit Care. 2018 Apr;44:285-288. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.11.037. Epub 2017 Dec 22.

    PMID: 29223743BACKGROUND
  • Kaese S, Zander MC, Lebiedz P. Successful Use of Early Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheotomy and the No Sedation Concept in Respiratory Failure in Critically Ill Obese Subjects. Respir Care. 2016 May;61(5):615-20. doi: 10.4187/respcare.04333. Epub 2016 Jan 12.

    PMID: 26759420BACKGROUND
  • Wang R, Pan C, Wang X, Xu F, Jiang S, Li M. The impact of tracheotomy timing in critically ill patients undergoing mechanical ventilation: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials with trial sequential analysis. Heart Lung. 2019 Jan;48(1):46-54. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2018.09.005. Epub 2018 Oct 15.

    PMID: 30336945BACKGROUND
  • Tipping CJ, Harrold M, Holland A, Romero L, Nisbet T, Hodgson CL. The effects of active mobilisation and rehabilitation in ICU on mortality and function: a systematic review. Intensive Care Med. 2017 Feb;43(2):171-183. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4612-0. Epub 2016 Nov 18.

    PMID: 27864615BACKGROUND
  • Pisegna JM, Murray J. Clinical Application of Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing in Stroke. Semin Speech Lang. 2018 Feb;39(1):3-14. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1608855. Epub 2018 Jan 22.

    PMID: 29359301BACKGROUND
  • Zhou J, Li HL, Luo XY, Chen GQ, Yang YL, Zhang L, Xu M, Shi GZ, Zhou JX. Predictive value of cough peak flow for successful extubation in mechanically ventilated patients after craniotomy: a single-centre prospective diagnostic study. BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 2;15(1):e088219. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088219.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Facial NeuralgiaCritical Illness

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Facial Nerve DiseasesMouth DiseasesStomatognathic DiseasesCranial Nerve DiseasesNervous System DiseasesDisease AttributesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Jianxin Zhou, MD

    Beijing Tian Tan Hospital

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 26, 2019

First Posted

June 27, 2019

Study Start

August 1, 2019

Primary Completion

February 28, 2021

Study Completion

December 31, 2021

Last Updated

October 21, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Data sets generated during the current study are available from the first author on reasonable request.

Shared Documents
SAP
Time Frame
June to December 2025
Access Criteria
It is necessary to provide materials related to the purpose of the data and the usage plan, and sign a data sharing agreement. In addition, the use of the data is subject to the approval of the Ethics Committee of our hospital. The first author can be contacted by email.

Locations