The Predictive Value of Peak Cough Flow for Endotracheal Extubation of Patients After Craniotomy
PCFET
The Predictive Value of Cough Peak Flow for Extubation Success in Mechanically Ventilated Patients After Craniotomy: a Single-center Prospective Diagnostic Study
1 other identifier
observational
785
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In severe cases after craniotomy, tracheal intubation is often required, and the removal of tracheal intubation presents certain risks and challenges. Premature removal of the tracheal intubation can lead to failure of extubation and increased proportion of re-intubation, resulting in increased risk of airway injury and hospital-acquired pneumonia, resulting in prolonged hospital stay and even adverse effects on neurological outcomes and mortality. However, delayed extubation can also lead to an increased risk of hospital acquired pneumonia, affecting early recovery and neurological recovery. It can be seen that the accurate evaluation of the possibility of tracheal intubation and the appropriate timing can have a greater impact on the prognosis of patients after craniotomy. However, there are currently no relevant standards or guidelines to guide clinical work. Previous studies have shown that for general critically ill patients, Peak cough flow (PCF) can play a certain role in predicting tracheal intubation, but the results of each study are not consistent. The predictive value of PCF for tracheal intubation and extubation in patients after craniotomy is less relevant. This study intends to use Pneumotachograph to measure the active and passive PCF of patients with extubation, to explore the predictive value of PCF for tracheal intubation after craniotomy, and to provide guidance for the development of clinical extubation decisions.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Aug 2019
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 26, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 27, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 28, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2021
CompletedOctober 21, 2024
February 1, 2024
1.6 years
June 26, 2019
October 18, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Predictive value of CPF for endotracheal extubation
Failure of extubation refers to re-intubation within 72 hours after extubation
72h after extubation
Secondary Outcomes (1)
mortality rates
in hospital
Study Arms (2)
Failure group
Patients with a failure extubation
Success group
Patients with a successful extubation
Eligibility Criteria
Patients admitted into ICU ward after craniotomy will be screened. Those ones meeting the including criteria will be included. patients would be grouped by their extubation outcomes.
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Post- craniotomy
- ICU LOS ≥ 24h
You may not qualify if:
- no extubation attempt during the ICU stay;
- underwent tracheostomy without extubation attempt;
- pregnant or lactating women;
- enrolled in other clinical trials;
- declined to participate in the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Jianfang Zhou
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100020, China
Related Publications (11)
Reis HF, Almeida ML, Silva MF, Rocha Mde S. Extubation failure influences clinical and functional outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injury. J Bras Pneumol. 2013 May-Jun;39(3):330-8. doi: 10.1590/S1806-37132013000300010.
PMID: 23857695BACKGROUNDMcCredie VA, Ferguson ND, Pinto RL, Adhikari NK, Fowler RA, Chapman MG, Burrell A, Baker AJ, Cook DJ, Meade MO, Scales DC; Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. Airway Management Strategies for Brain-injured Patients Meeting Standard Criteria to Consider Extubation. A Prospective Cohort Study. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 Jan;14(1):85-93. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201608-620OC.
PMID: 27870576BACKGROUNDHyde GA, Savage SA, Zarzaur BL, Hart-Hyde JE, Schaefer CB, Croce MA, Fabian TC. Early tracheostomy in trauma patients saves time and money. Injury. 2015 Jan;46(1):110-4. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.08.049. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
PMID: 25441577BACKGROUNDAlali AS, Scales DC, Fowler RA, Mainprize TG, Ray JG, Kiss A, de Mestral C, Nathens AB. Tracheostomy timing in traumatic brain injury: a propensity-matched cohort study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Jan;76(1):70-6; discussion 76-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182a8fd6a.
PMID: 24368359BACKGROUNDBosel J, Schiller P, Hook Y, Andes M, Neumann JO, Poli S, Amiri H, Schonenberger S, Peng Z, Unterberg A, Hacke W, Steiner T. Stroke-related Early Tracheostomy versus Prolonged Orotracheal Intubation in Neurocritical Care Trial (SETPOINT): a randomized pilot trial. Stroke. 2013 Jan;44(1):21-8. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.669895. Epub 2012 Nov 29.
PMID: 23204058BACKGROUNDHerritt B, Chaudhuri D, Thavorn K, Kubelik D, Kyeremanteng K. Early vs. late tracheostomy in intensive care settings: Impact on ICU and hospital costs. J Crit Care. 2018 Apr;44:285-288. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.11.037. Epub 2017 Dec 22.
PMID: 29223743BACKGROUNDKaese S, Zander MC, Lebiedz P. Successful Use of Early Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheotomy and the No Sedation Concept in Respiratory Failure in Critically Ill Obese Subjects. Respir Care. 2016 May;61(5):615-20. doi: 10.4187/respcare.04333. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
PMID: 26759420BACKGROUNDWang R, Pan C, Wang X, Xu F, Jiang S, Li M. The impact of tracheotomy timing in critically ill patients undergoing mechanical ventilation: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials with trial sequential analysis. Heart Lung. 2019 Jan;48(1):46-54. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2018.09.005. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
PMID: 30336945BACKGROUNDTipping CJ, Harrold M, Holland A, Romero L, Nisbet T, Hodgson CL. The effects of active mobilisation and rehabilitation in ICU on mortality and function: a systematic review. Intensive Care Med. 2017 Feb;43(2):171-183. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4612-0. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
PMID: 27864615BACKGROUNDPisegna JM, Murray J. Clinical Application of Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing in Stroke. Semin Speech Lang. 2018 Feb;39(1):3-14. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1608855. Epub 2018 Jan 22.
PMID: 29359301BACKGROUNDZhou J, Li HL, Luo XY, Chen GQ, Yang YL, Zhang L, Xu M, Shi GZ, Zhou JX. Predictive value of cough peak flow for successful extubation in mechanically ventilated patients after craniotomy: a single-centre prospective diagnostic study. BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 2;15(1):e088219. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088219.
PMID: 39753249DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Jianxin Zhou, MD
Beijing Tian Tan Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 26, 2019
First Posted
June 27, 2019
Study Start
August 1, 2019
Primary Completion
February 28, 2021
Study Completion
December 31, 2021
Last Updated
October 21, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- SAP
- Time Frame
- June to December 2025
- Access Criteria
- It is necessary to provide materials related to the purpose of the data and the usage plan, and sign a data sharing agreement. In addition, the use of the data is subject to the approval of the Ethics Committee of our hospital. The first author can be contacted by email.
Data sets generated during the current study are available from the first author on reasonable request.