NCT04000672

Brief Summary

Medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy is a surgery performed to treat knee osteoarthritis in young patients.Recently with our department advance of technology, the investigators performed computed tomography for the patient's lower limb and 3D reconstruct the image. Based on the 3D image, the investigators planned our planned osteotomy cut on computer software Materialize 3 and the investigators then 3D printed a metal jig that has a slot to produce the osteotomy and also protected the neurovascular bundles. Therefore these metal jigs are specific to each patients. The investigators have performed a few cases of HTO under this extra metal jig protection and guidance and noted it has improved accuracy and safety clinically. However, whether it has scientific significance difference in accuracy is not known.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2019

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 22, 2019

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 27, 2019

Completed
4 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2019

Completed
4.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 6, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 6, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

December 7, 2023

Status Verified

December 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

4.4 years

First QC Date

June 22, 2019

Last Update Submit

December 6, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

Patient Specific InstrumentationRandomized controlled trialHigh Tibial Osteotomy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (26)

  • Knee Society knee score

    Clinical and functional scores, on a 100-point scale; Knee Society score (KSS) has a "Knee Score" section (7 items) and a "Functional Score" section (3 items). Both sections are scored from 0 to 100 with lower scores being indicative of worse knee conditions and higher scores being indicative of better knee conditions. "Excellent" for score 80-100, "Good" for score 70-79, "Fair" for score 60-69, "Poor" for score below 60.

    1 week before surgery

  • Knee Society knee score

    Clinical and functional scores, on a 100-point scale; Knee Society score (KSS) has a "Knee Score" section (7 items) and a "Functional Score" section (3 items). Both sections are scored from 0 to 100 with lower scores being indicative of worse knee conditions and higher scores being indicative of better knee conditions. "Excellent" for score 80-100, "Good" for score 70-79, "Fair" for score 60-69, "Poor" for score below 60.

    6 months post-op

  • Knee Society knee score

    Clinical and functional scores, on a 100-point scale; Knee Society score (KSS) has a "Knee Score" section (7 items) and a "Functional Score" section (3 items). Both sections are scored from 0 to 100 with lower scores being indicative of worse knee conditions and higher scores being indicative of better knee conditions. "Excellent" for score 80-100, "Good" for score 70-79, "Fair" for score 60-69, "Poor" for score below 60.

    1 year post-op

  • Knee Society knee score

    Clinical and functional scores, on a 100-point scale; Knee Society score (KSS) has a "Knee Score" section (7 items) and a "Functional Score" section (3 items). Both sections are scored from 0 to 100 with lower scores being indicative of worse knee conditions and higher scores being indicative of better knee conditions. "Excellent" for score 80-100, "Good" for score 70-79, "Fair" for score 60-69, "Poor" for score below 60.

    2 year post-op

  • Knee Society function score

    Clinical and functional scores, on a 100-point scale; Knee Society score (KSS) has a "Knee Score" section (7 items) and a "Functional Score" section (3 items). Both sections are scored from 0 to 100 with lower scores being indicative of worse knee conditions and higher scores being indicative of better knee conditions. "Excellent" for score 80-100, "Good" for score 70-79, "Fair" for score 60-69, "Poor" for score below 60.

    1 week before surgery

  • Knee Society function score

    Clinical and functional scores, on a 100-point scale; Knee Society score (KSS) has a "Knee Score" section (7 items) and a "Functional Score" section (3 items). Both sections are scored from 0 to 100 with lower scores being indicative of worse knee conditions and higher scores being indicative of better knee conditions. "Excellent" for score 80-100, "Good" for score 70-79, "Fair" for score 60-69, "Poor" for score below 60.

    6 months post-op

  • Knee Society function score

    Clinical and functional scores, on a 100-point scale; Knee Society score (KSS) has a "Knee Score" section (7 items) and a "Functional Score" section (3 items). Both sections are scored from 0 to 100 with lower scores being indicative of worse knee conditions and higher scores being indicative of better knee conditions. "Excellent" for score 80-100, "Good" for score 70-79, "Fair" for score 60-69, "Poor" for score below 60.

    1 year post-op

  • Knee Society function score

    Clinical and functional scores, on a 100-point scale; Knee Society score (KSS) has a "Knee Score" section (7 items) and a "Functional Score" section (3 items). Both sections are scored from 0 to 100 with lower scores being indicative of worse knee conditions and higher scores being indicative of better knee conditions. "Excellent" for score 80-100, "Good" for score 70-79, "Fair" for score 60-69, "Poor" for score below 60.

    2 year post-op

  • Oxford Knee Score

    Clinical and functional scores

    1 week before surgery

  • Oxford Knee Score

    Clinical and functional scores

    6 months post-op

  • Oxford Knee Score

    Clinical and functional scores

    1 year post-op

  • Oxford Knee Score

    Clinical and functional scores

    2 year post-op

  • Range of motion

    Evaluated using a manual goniometer

    1 week before surgery

  • Range of motion

    Evaluated using a manual goniometer

    1 week before discharge

  • Range of motion

    Evaluated using a manual goniometer

    3 months post-op

  • Range of motion

    Evaluated using a manual goniometer

    6 months post-op

  • Range of motion

    Evaluated using a manual goniometer

    1 year post-op

  • Range of motion

    Evaluated using a manual goniometer

    2 year post-op

  • Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score

    The VAS is a psychometric response scale and a measurement instrument for subjective characteristics or attitudes that cannot be directly measured. The VAS pain ranges 0-10, with 10 representing the most pain.

    1 week before surgery

  • Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score

    The VAS is a psychometric response scale and a measurement instrument for subjective characteristics or attitudes that cannot be directly measured. The VAS pain ranges 0-10, with 10 representing the most pain.

    1 week before discharge

  • Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score

    The VAS is a psychometric response scale and a measurement instrument for subjective characteristics or attitudes that cannot be directly measured. The VAS pain ranges 0-10, with 10 representing the most pain.

    3 months post-op

  • Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score

    The VAS is a psychometric response scale and a measurement instrument for subjective characteristics or attitudes that cannot be directly measured. The VAS pain ranges 0-10, with 10 representing the most pain.

    6 months post-op

  • Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score

    The VAS is a psychometric response scale and a measurement instrument for subjective characteristics or attitudes that cannot be directly measured. The VAS pain ranges 0-10, with 10 representing the most pain.

    1 year post-op

  • Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score

    The VAS is a psychometric response scale and a measurement instrument for subjective characteristics or attitudes that cannot be directly measured. The VAS pain ranges 0-10, with 10 representing the most pain.

    2 year post-op

  • Measurement of knee displacement

    Measure the displacement (in cm) between femoral head and tibial head on a secured computer using CT scan images and scanogram images

    1 week before surgery

  • Measurement of knee displacement

    Measure the displacement (in cm) between femoral head and tibial head on a secured computer using CT scan images and scanogram images

    1 year after surgery

Study Arms (2)

HTO with navigation

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

High Tibial Osteotomy is offered to patients with symptomatic medial compartment knee osteoarthritis (OA)

Procedure: HTO with navigation

HTO with navigation + PSI jig

EXPERIMENTAL

3D printed patient specific metal jigs (PSI jig) are created based on the pre-operative CT image. After that, calibrated osteotome is used to achieve the desired correction with the use of navigation for overall lower limb alignment, which is the same as the "Active Comparator" group.

Procedure: 3D printed patient specific metal jigs (PSI jig)Procedure: HTO with navigation

Interventions

PSI jig is created based on the pre-operative CT image. Standard medial open wedge osteotomy described previously is performed. Incision is made in the midway between posteromedial border of the tibia and medial aspect of the tibial tuberosity. Sartorius fascia is cut and retracted medially to expose the medial collateral ligament (MCL). Then the PSI jig is positioned onto the tibia. Due to the jig patient specific design (individually based on each patient's CT image), it can fit closely to the proximal tibia. The slot opening on the PSI jig corresponds to 4 cm below the medial joint line and the slot design allow the sawblade cut direction toward the safe zone of the lateral cortex under fluoroscopy. The PSI Jig is removed after the bone cut completed and would not retain in patient's body.

HTO with navigation + PSI jig

In brief, an incision is made in the midway between posteromedial border of the tibia and medial aspect of the tibial tuberosity. Sartorius fascia is cut and retracted medially to expose the medial collateral ligament (MCL). Two to three K-wires are placed 4 cm below the medial joint line toward the safe zone (an area between the tip of the fibular head and the remnant of fibular head epiphysis line) of the lateral cortex under fluoroscopy and osteotomy is done below and parallel to the k-wires using an oscillating saw leaving the lateral 10 mm intact.

HTO with navigationHTO with navigation + PSI jig

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • symptomatic patient with medial compartment knee OA
  • medial compartment OA was grade 3 or milder according to Kellgren-Lawrence classification

You may not qualify if:

  • lateral compartment OA
  • symptomatic patellofemoral compartment OA,
  • inflammatory arthritis,
  • significant loss of knee joint range in flexion (less than 100°) or in extension (less than - 10°),
  • ligamentous instability,
  • obesity with a body mass index greater than 30,
  • significant psychological disorder
  • inability to communicate in Chinese or English language

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Prince of Wales Hospital & Alice Ho Miu Ling Nethersole Hospital

Shatin, Hong Kong

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Lau LCM, Chui ECS, Fan JCH, Man GCW, Hung YW, Ho KKW, Chung KY, Wan SYC, Chau JWW, Yung PSH, Bhandari M. Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) Referencing High Tibial Osteotomy Technological Transfer and Education: protocol for a double-blind, randomised controlled trial (PROTECTED HTO Trial). BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 5;11(2):e041129. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041129.

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Randomization will be accomplished by computer-generated randomization sequence using serially numbered opaque, sealed envelopes with patients assigned either to intervention or control groups. All investigators, research staff, patients except the surgeon performing the HTO will be blinded to the group assignment of the subjects. Nor they will be aware of the regimen prescribed during the study and evaluation periods. A randomization code will be allocated to each included subjects to maintain blindness. Randomization code will be broken only after the database had been locked. Patient rehabilitation, post-operative assessment and Data analysis are conducted by personnel blinded to the patients' randomization assignment.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Control group: High tibial osteotomy with navigation Intervention group: High tibial osteotomy with navigation and PSI jig
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principle Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 22, 2019

First Posted

June 27, 2019

Study Start

July 1, 2019

Primary Completion

December 6, 2023

Study Completion

December 6, 2023

Last Updated

December 7, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Data and resources will be shared with other eligible investigators through academically established means. The protocol and datasets used and/or analysed in this study will be available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
Time Frame
after study completes
Access Criteria
Data and resources will be shared with other eligible investigators through academically established means. The protocol and datasets used and/or analysed in this study will be available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Locations