Episealer® Knee System IDE Clinical Study
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multi-Center Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of the Episealer® Knee System Compared to Microfracture for the Treatment of Focal Femoral Knee Chondral or Osteochondral Lesions
1 other identifier
interventional
13
4 countries
13
Brief Summary
The study is a randomized, prospective, multicenter, controlled clinical trial of the Episealer Knee System. The Episealer Knee System is intended for subjects with up to two focal femoral knee chondral or osteochondral lesion that is causing pain and/or disability and requires surgical treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2020
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
13 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 10, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 27, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 18, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2028
July 30, 2024
July 1, 2024
6 years
June 10, 2019
July 29, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Change in the Knee Injury & Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Subscores
This endpoint will examine the change in KOOS subscores at 24 months
24 Months
Change in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Scores
This endpoint will examine the change in VAS Pain scores at 24 months
24 Months
Incidence of Secondary Surgical Intervention
This endpoint will examine the incidence of Secondary Surgical Interventions (SSIs) at 24 months
24 Months
Incidence of subsidence or migration at 24 months
This endpoint will examine the incidence of subsidence/migration at 24 months
24 Months
Weight bearing status
This endpoint will examine the weight bearing status at 8 weeks
8 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Change in the KOOS Subscores at all follow-up time points
3-weeks, 8-weeks, 6-months, 12-months, and 24-months
Change in VAS Pain score at all follow-up time points
3-weeks, 8-weeks, 6-months, 12-months, and 24-months
Change in 12-Item Short Form Survey (SF-12) score at all follow-up time points
3-weeks, 8-weeks, 6-months, 12-months, and 24-months
Incidence of radiographic findings at all follow-up time points
8 weeks, 12-months, and 24-months
Incidence of adverse events and device deficiencies at all follow-up time points
3-weeks, 8-weeks, 6-months, 12-months and 24-months
Study Arms (2)
Episealer Knee System
EXPERIMENTALThe experimental arm will comprise of subjects that will be treated with the Episealer Knee System.
Microfracture
PLACEBO COMPARATORThe control arm will comprise of subjects that will receive a Microfracture surgery.
Interventions
The Episealer Knee System is comprised of individualized endoprosthetic resurfacing implants and implantation tools (Episealer Toolkit). The implants are designed to replace the articulating surface which has been damaged due to femoral knee chondral and osteochondral defects.
Microfracture is a minimally invasive surgical technique developed to repair defects in articular cartilage and reduce pain in the knee joint. Microfracture techniques are described in the orthopedic literature and are performed arthroscopically.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Be ≥ 30 years and ≤ 70 years.
- Have up to 2 symptomatic femoral chondral or osteochondral defects in the index knee on the medial or lateral femoral condyles or the knee trochlea area, which are:
- ICRS Grade 2, 3 or Grade 4
- Each suitable for treatment with 1 Episealer device NOTE: Additional femoral cartilage lesions which, in the opinion of the investigator, are asymptomatic and free from underlying bone lesions (e.g., bone edema) will not be treated.
- Have focal articular defect(s) each with a cartilage lesion area ≥ 1.5 cm2 and ≤ 7.0 cm2.
- Subjects with up to two defects ≥ 1.5 cm2 and ≤ 4.0 cm2, that are surrounded by adequate circumferential cartilage as determined by the investigator, will be randomized.
- Subjects with at least one defect \> 4.0 cm2 and ≤ 7.0 cm2, with adequate bony support as determined by the investigator, will not be randomized, and will receive the Episealer device.
- Have screening scores that meet the following criteria:
- Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score of the index knee of ≥ 40 mm
- KOOS Overall Score of ≤ 60
- Have experienced knee pain symptoms and undergone prior non-surgical management (e.g., physical therapy, bracing, HA injections) for at least 4 weeks prior to being considered for the study.
- Be able to give voluntary, written informed consent to participate and have signed an Informed Consent Form specific to this study.
- Be willing and able to comply with all study procedures including all pre-operative, post-operative, and rehabilitation requirements.
- If female and of child-bearing potential, must have a negative pregnancy test prior to the surgical procedure and no intention of becoming pregnant in the next 24 months.
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects who meet any of the following pre-operative screening criteria will be excluded from participation in this study:
- Have a Body Mass Index (BMI) greater than 37 kg/m2.
- Have an ICRS Grade 3 or 4 tibial lesion of any size, or an ICRS Grade 4 patella lesion/fissure ≥ 2.0 mm in width in the index knee.
- Have malalignment of \>8 degrees varus or valgus in the index knee based on standard AP x-rays.
- Have deficits in flexion or extension of \>10 degrees in the index knee as compared to the contralateral knee.
- Have an existing prosthesis in the index knee compartment or opposing joint surface.
- Have joint instability in the index knee due to soft tissue or muscular insufficiency.
- Have inadequate bone stock underlying the lesion site, in the opinion of the investigator.
- Have any condition, therapy, or medication that may impair bone healing or prevent adequate implant fixation (e.g., osteoporosis).
- Have a diagnosis of a concomitant knee injury, which in the opinion of the investigator, may confound assessment of the index knee.
- Have any meniscus tears or defects that require resection of more than 1/3 of the meniscus in the compartment to be treated (i.e., medial meniscus when medial femoral compartment is being treated; lateral meniscus when lateral femoral compartment is being treated).
- Have a contralateral knee with symptomatic cartilage, meniscal, or ligamentous lesions; generalized osteoarthritis, or any condition that requires surgery, which in the opinion of the investigator, may confound assessment of the index knee, or any condition that requires surgery.
- Have any condition that is unrelated to the index knee and significantly impairs walking ability (e.g., spinal stenosis, sciatica).
- Have undergone previous treatment with autograft or allograft transfer, synthetic plugs, or microfracture in the index knee within 6 months of screening. (NOTE: Subjects who have undergone debridement at any point in the past are not excluded).
- Have a loss of joint space on standing radiographs (Kellgren-Lawrence Grade ≥3) in the index knee.
- +19 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Episurf Medical Inc.lead
- MCRAcollaborator
Study Sites (13)
Physicians Research Group
Tempe, Arizona, 85284, United States
Horizon Clinical Research
La Mesa, California, 91942, United States
Ochsner Sports Medicine Institute
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70121, United States
Hackensack University Medical Center
Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601, United States
Plancher Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine
New York, New York, 10128, United States
Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, 43202, United States
Helios Clinical Research
Jackson, Tennessee, 38305, United States
North Texas Medical Research Institute
Dallas, Texas, 75254, United States
QEII Health Sciences Center
Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 2E1, Canada
Universitatsmedizin Berlin Charite
Berlin, 10117, Germany
Orthocentrum Hamburg
Hamburg, 20149, Germany
University Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust
Coventry, England, CV2 2DX, United Kingdom
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
Southampton, SO16 6YD, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Katarina Flodström
Episurf Medical Inc.
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- In this investigation, neither the investigator nor the subject can be blinded to the treatment group assignment due to the implant's distinctive form that can be detected on radiographs; however, the randomization assignment will not be disclosed to the subject until after surgery is performed.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 10, 2019
First Posted
June 27, 2019
Study Start
June 18, 2020
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2028
Last Updated
July 30, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-07