Study Stopped
The recruitment was halted on Mar 1st 2024, after the Data Monitoring Committee, due to low recruitment speed and sustained high dropout rate. Other elements impacted negatively, including the SARS-COV-2 pandemic or the inability to include new sites
RCT Study to Validate niPGT-A Clinical Benefit.
niPGT-A_RCT
Randomized Controlled Clinical Study to Assess the Benefit of Non-invasive PGT-A, by the Analysis of Spent Blastocyst Media, as a Tool for Embryo Prioritization in Infertile Patients Undergoing Assisted Reproduction.
1 other identifier
interventional
296
5 countries
8
Brief Summary
Chromosomal aneuploidies are linked with spontaneous miscarriages and abnormal offspring in human pregnancies. In addition, some types of aneuploidies are reported to prevent implantation. Thus, there is a need to identify the embryos with highest implantation potential on in vitro fertilization (IVF) programs. Since embryo morphology and kinetics have a weak association with embryo ploidy, trophectoderm biopsy plus Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) is becoming a very popular approach to determine the embryo chromosomal status. This technique is called Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy (PGT-A). Although shown to be efficient, it is invasive for the embryo, requires specific technical skills and it remains expensive. Therefore, the development of a non-invasive, rapid and cheaper method for assessing embryo ploidy status would represent a progress in the field of IVF. The non-invasive approach has been explored by some groups that analyzed the Spent Blastocyst Medium (SBM) where the embryo was incubated up to the time of transfer or freezing. In daily routine, this media is discarded after finishing the culture of the embryo. Importantly, though, this media reportedly contains traces of embryonic cell-free DNA (cfDNA) that can represent the genetic load of the embryo. On the basis of that, the hypothesis of this study is that embryo prioritization according to the analysis of the embryonic cfDNA in the SBM could improve ongoing pregnancy rate in 10 percentual points compared to standard blastocyst transfer based on morphology.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jun 2020
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
8 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 25, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 27, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 29, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 18, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 18, 2025
CompletedOctober 1, 2025
September 1, 2025
4.8 years
June 25, 2019
September 25, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Non-invasive analysis of the chromosomal status of the embryo
Number and structure of the embryo chromosomes
7 days
Ongoing pregnancy rate
Number of ongoing pregnancies per single embryo transfer
Over 12 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (9)
NGS results of the SBM
7 days at least
Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT)
Up to 12 weeks
Clinical miscarriage rate
Up to 6 months after the ovum pick-up
Analysis of the Products of Conception (POC)
Up to 20 weeks
Cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate
Over 6 months after the ovum pick-up
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Control group (group 1)
ACTIVE COMPARATORDeferred single day 6/7 blastocyst transfer with blastocyst selection according to morphology.
Intervention group (group 2)
EXPERIMENTALDeferred single day 6/7 blastocyst transfer with blastocyst selection according to the analysis of the spent culture media (niPGT-A).
Interventions
Two scenarios should be considered according to the results in the SBM analysis: 1. The couple decides to transfer the blastocyst selected according to the SBM result (blastocyst prioritization system). 2. The couple decides to biopsy the blastocysts (if SBM results show low euploidy score). This PGT-A analysis will be offered for free but the outcome of these transfers will be excluded for the analysis per completed protocol. However, all transfers will be included in the intention-to-treat analysis. In the exceptional case of getting a non-informative result for all the SBM analysed, the niPGT-A could be performed again on new SBM samples collected after an additional culture of the embryos for, at least, 8 hours.
Embryos for transfer will be selected by the only applicable technique, the assessment of morphology according to Gardner´s criteria, which is the most standardized method.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients whose written informed consent approved by the Ethics Committee (EC) has been obtained, after having been duly informed of the nature of the study and voluntarily accepted to participate after being fully aware of the potential risks, benefits and any discomfort involved.
- IVF patients intending to undergo deferred day 6/7 blastocyst SET for any medical indication.
- All the oocytes/embryos from the cycle should follow the laboratory protocol described in the study (embryo culture and vitrification on day 6/7).
- ICSI, IVF or ICSI/IVF performed in fresh own oocytes from couples not undergoing PGT-A. Note: Donor sperm is allowed.
- Female age: 20-40 years, both included.
You may not qualify if:
- Assisted hatching and artificial collapse before collecting SBM samples. Note: Both procedures are allowed only after collecting the culture media sample.
- A known abnormal karyotype if the couple provides it at consultation. If not, karyotype is not compulsory.
- Couples planning to undergo PGT-M or PGT-SR cases will be excluded.
- Surrogate pregnancy (in those countries where it is allowed).
- ERA test and embryo transfer according to ERA result.
- Time-lapse culture systems are not allowed after day 4 of culture.
- Any illness or medical condition that is unstable or which, according to medical criteria, may put at risk the patient's safety and her compliance in the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Igenomixlead
Study Sites (8)
Crecer: Centro de Reproducción y Genética Humana
Mar del Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Saresa - Reproducción Humana Asistida
Salta, Salta Province, 4400, Argentina
Nilo Frantz - Centro de Reprodução Humana
Boa Vista, Porto Alegre, 91330-002, Brazil
Vida - Centro de Fertilidade
Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 22793-080, Brazil
Hôpital Foch
Suresnes, Suresnes, 92150, France
Società Italiana Studi di Medicina della Riproduzione (S.I.S.M.e.R.)
Bologna, Bologna, 40138, Italy
Centro Procreazione Assistita DEMETRA
Florence, Firenze, 50141, Italy
Hospital Ruber Internacional
Madrid, Madrid, 28035, Spain
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Carmen Rubio, PhD
Igenomix S.L.
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 25, 2019
First Posted
June 27, 2019
Study Start
June 29, 2020
Primary Completion
April 18, 2025
Study Completion
April 18, 2025
Last Updated
October 1, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share