Wrist Fracture Evaluation With a Desktop Orthopedic Tomosynthesis System
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Trauma to the extremities such wrist, ankle, limb is very common and affects all population groups. It constitutes a significant public health issue. Standard radiography remains the basic imaging tool. However, as a 2-dimensional (2D) imaging modality it lacks sensitivity and specificity. Misdiagnosis rates are known to be high, especially for non-displaced fractures of the scaphoid and talus as well as erosions due to rheumatoid arthritis. Misdiagnosis leads to over treatment and unnecessary loss of productivity and quality of life including 6-12 weeks in a cast. Missed fractures can result in a chronic, non-healing fracture that may require surgical fixation and early arthritis of the joint. From a physician perspective, a missed diagnosis can result in a lawsuit and an expensive settlement/penalty. Computed tomography (CT) offers high resolution and excellent visualization of bone and joint morphology, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) delivers soft tissue and cartilage visibility. However, cost, space and workflow related issues make them prohibitive for small orthopedic clinics. Although the radiation dose of a CT scan has been reduced considerably in recent years, it is still significantly higher than a regular radiograph. The whole-body scanners also have difficulties in imaging patients in portable and weight-bearing conditions. Dedicated extremity CT scanners have been commercialized recently in an attempt to address the current deficiency. They still suffer from higher cost and at such have a limited installation base.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2019
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 12, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 21, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 5, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 3, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 3, 2021
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 7, 2022
CompletedFebruary 3, 2023
December 1, 2021
2 years
June 12, 2019
September 12, 2022
February 1, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Sensitivity
The sensitivity of Tomo-E is defined as the ability of readers (radiologists) to detect wrist fractures in patients. Diagnostic accuracy will be defined by the presence of a fracture as clinically determined by the attending orthopedic surgeon. All Tomo-E scans will be reviewed in a standardized reader study at the conclusion of all study imaging to determine the overall sensitivity of the device.
8 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Specificity
8 months
Study Arms (1)
All Participants
EXPERIMENTALParticipants that have undergone standard of care, conventional 2D radiographic imaging of wrist for presumed or known scaphoid, wrist or distal radius fractures will receive the Tomo-E scans within two weeks.
Interventions
High-resolution limited-angle tomography positioning and examination will vary depending on injury.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18 or older
- Undergone radiographic imaging of wrist for presumed or known scaphoid, wrist or distal radius fractures within 2 weeks or are scheduled to undergo such imaging.
- Able to provide informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Patients will an intervening surgical procedure performed prior to study imaging.
- Institutionalized subject (prisoner or nursing home patient)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Director, Clinical Research Operations, Department of Radiology
- Organization
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Daniel Nissman, MD, MPH
UNC Chapel Hill
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 12, 2019
First Posted
June 21, 2019
Study Start
November 5, 2019
Primary Completion
November 3, 2021
Study Completion
November 3, 2021
Last Updated
February 3, 2023
Results First Posted
November 7, 2022
Record last verified: 2021-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
- Time Frame
- 9 to 36 months following publication
- Access Criteria
- The investigator who proposes to use the data has approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB), Independent Ethics Committee (IEC), or Research Ethics Board (REB), as applicable, and executes a data use/sharing agreement with UNC.
Identified individual data that supports the results will be shared beginning 9 to 36 months following publication provided the investigator who proposes to use the data has approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB), Independent Ethics Committee (IEC), or Research Ethics Board (REB), as applicable, and executes a data use/sharing agreement with UNC.