NCT03993691

Brief Summary

Trauma to the extremities such wrist, ankle, limb is very common and affects all population groups. It constitutes a significant public health issue. Standard radiography remains the basic imaging tool. However, as a 2-dimensional (2D) imaging modality it lacks sensitivity and specificity. Misdiagnosis rates are known to be high, especially for non-displaced fractures of the scaphoid and talus as well as erosions due to rheumatoid arthritis. Misdiagnosis leads to over treatment and unnecessary loss of productivity and quality of life including 6-12 weeks in a cast. Missed fractures can result in a chronic, non-healing fracture that may require surgical fixation and early arthritis of the joint. From a physician perspective, a missed diagnosis can result in a lawsuit and an expensive settlement/penalty. Computed tomography (CT) offers high resolution and excellent visualization of bone and joint morphology, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) delivers soft tissue and cartilage visibility. However, cost, space and workflow related issues make them prohibitive for small orthopedic clinics. Although the radiation dose of a CT scan has been reduced considerably in recent years, it is still significantly higher than a regular radiograph. The whole-body scanners also have difficulties in imaging patients in portable and weight-bearing conditions. Dedicated extremity CT scanners have been commercialized recently in an attempt to address the current deficiency. They still suffer from higher cost and at such have a limited installation base.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2019

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 12, 2019

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 21, 2019

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 5, 2019

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 3, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 3, 2021

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

November 7, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

February 3, 2023

Status Verified

December 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

June 12, 2019

Results QC Date

September 12, 2022

Last Update Submit

February 1, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

Scaphoid FractureWrist FractureDistal Radius Fracture

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Sensitivity

    The sensitivity of Tomo-E is defined as the ability of readers (radiologists) to detect wrist fractures in patients. Diagnostic accuracy will be defined by the presence of a fracture as clinically determined by the attending orthopedic surgeon. All Tomo-E scans will be reviewed in a standardized reader study at the conclusion of all study imaging to determine the overall sensitivity of the device.

    8 months

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Specificity

    8 months

Study Arms (1)

All Participants

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants that have undergone standard of care, conventional 2D radiographic imaging of wrist for presumed or known scaphoid, wrist or distal radius fractures will receive the Tomo-E scans within two weeks.

Device: Tomo-E scanDevice: Radiograph

Interventions

High-resolution limited-angle tomography positioning and examination will vary depending on injury.

Also known as: Digital Tomosynthesis
All Participants

Standard of Care radiographic imaging of wrist.

All Participants

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 99 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age 18 or older
  • Undergone radiographic imaging of wrist for presumed or known scaphoid, wrist or distal radius fractures within 2 weeks or are scheduled to undergo such imaging.
  • Able to provide informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients will an intervening surgical procedure performed prior to study imaging.
  • Institutionalized subject (prisoner or nursing home patient)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Fractures, BoneWrist Fractures

Interventions

MammographyDiagnostic Imaging

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Wounds and InjuriesWrist InjuriesArm Injuries

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

RadiographyDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosis

Results Point of Contact

Title
Director, Clinical Research Operations, Department of Radiology
Organization
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Study Officials

  • Daniel Nissman, MD, MPH

    UNC Chapel Hill

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 12, 2019

First Posted

June 21, 2019

Study Start

November 5, 2019

Primary Completion

November 3, 2021

Study Completion

November 3, 2021

Last Updated

February 3, 2023

Results First Posted

November 7, 2022

Record last verified: 2021-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Identified individual data that supports the results will be shared beginning 9 to 36 months following publication provided the investigator who proposes to use the data has approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB), Independent Ethics Committee (IEC), or Research Ethics Board (REB), as applicable, and executes a data use/sharing agreement with UNC.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL
Time Frame
9 to 36 months following publication
Access Criteria
The investigator who proposes to use the data has approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB), Independent Ethics Committee (IEC), or Research Ethics Board (REB), as applicable, and executes a data use/sharing agreement with UNC.

Locations