Primary Diagnosis Study for Validation of Hamamatsu NanoZoomer S360MD Digital Slide Scanner System
Clinical Validation for Non-Inferiority of Primary Diagnosis by WSI Hamamatsu NanoZoomer S360MD Digital Slide Scanner System Compared to Conventional Determination by Light Microscope
1 other identifier
interventional
2,000
1 country
4
Brief Summary
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and accuracy of the Hamamatsu WSI compared to those of the reference method (conventional light microscope (Glass)) under clinical use conditions as an aid for pathologists to view, review and diagnose digital images of surgical pathology slides. The primary endpoint is the indicator of major discordance in primary diagnosis between ground truth case diagnosis and case diagnosis by each modality, WSI and Glass, separately.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Mar 2019
Typical duration for not_applicable
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 15, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 18, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 19, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 31, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 31, 2021
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 22, 2022
CompletedDecember 22, 2022
November 1, 2022
2.4 years
June 18, 2019
October 31, 2022
November 30, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Major Discordance Rate
Indpendent reads by four Reading Pathologists (RPs) of both imaging modalitites (8 reads/case) were compared to the original diagnosis ("ground truth" or GT) by an independent adjudication process. This resulted in one of four adjudication outcomes for each read: "Match" (read = GT), "Minor" (minor discordance between read \& GT), "Major" (major discordance between read \& GT), or "Deferred" (read deferred by RP and excluded from the primary endpoint analysis). The outcome measure was the rate at which major discordances occurred for each modality.
1 day
Study Arms (2)
NanoZoomer Whole Slide Imaging
EXPERIMENTALAll cases will be assessed via Whole Slide Imaging using the Hamamatsu NanoZoomer S360MD Digital Slide Scanner System to assess pathological characteristics of scanned slides.
Glass Slide Light Microscopy
ACTIVE COMPARATORAll cases will be assessed via the use of traditional light microscopy to assess pathological characteristics of glass slides.
Interventions
Scanning of a glass slide to create a digital image that can be viewed on a monitor
Use of traditional light microscopy per institutional standard practice
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Cases originating from and that were diagnosed at that local site
- Cases are available in the site's archive
- Cases are at least 1 year old since accessioning
- Cases are selected because their primary diagnosis is consistent with the assigned target categories
- Cases have a set of slides representative of the primary diagnosis for which it has been selected
- Slide selection for a given case must meet the following criteria:
- Slide is obtained by surgical pathology and prepared from FFPE human tissue
- Slides must be stained with H\&E and accompanying special stains (histochemical and/or immunohistochemical)
- All special stains slides (histochemical and/or immunohistochemical) where the slide and stain is used for diagnosis, not prognosis.
- A chosen slide must demonstrate and be representative of the primary diagnosis; 1 slide selection may suffice for biopsy cases,
- For resection cases, a minimum of 5 slides must be selected, which represent the primary diagnosis. If represented with less than 5 slides, additional slides (primary, secondary, or benign slides) from same case may be used to fulfill minimum number
- Slide is intact, has correct size/thickness, good edges, undamaged coverslip, without pen markings that can't be removed, no air bubbles, tidy labels, and fulfills the quality checks per the general clinical practice
You may not qualify if:
- Case does not have relevant slides or if case information necessary for the study is missing
- Case is still active (less than 1 year old) at the local site
- Cases for which the control slides for immunohistochemistry and special stains are not available
- Two cases from same individual
- Gross-only cases that have no slides
- Cases that are frozen section, cytology or hematology or immunofluorescence specimens only
- Case where the only available set of slides have evidence only of secondary or no diagnoses and not the primary diagnosis for which the case is being screened.
- Slides for a given case will be excluded if they meet the following criterion:
- Glass slide that is broken, has abnormal size/thickness, beveled edges, poor coverslip (cracks, waviness, scratches), is sticky, has many pen markings or dirt that cannot be removed, contains air bubbles and overhanging labels that can't be corrected, and if stain is severely faded.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (4)
Washington University
St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States
TriCore Reference Laboratories
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87102, United States
The Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States
The Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, 43210-1063, United States
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- MCG Manager
- Organization
- Hamamatsu Photonics, K.K.
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Liron Pantanowitz
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Adjudicators are blinded to the imaging modality.
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SEQUENTIAL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 18, 2019
First Posted
June 19, 2019
Study Start
March 15, 2019
Primary Completion
July 31, 2021
Study Completion
July 31, 2021
Last Updated
December 22, 2022
Results First Posted
December 22, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share