NCT03991468

Brief Summary

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and accuracy of the Hamamatsu WSI compared to those of the reference method (conventional light microscope (Glass)) under clinical use conditions as an aid for pathologists to view, review and diagnose digital images of surgical pathology slides. The primary endpoint is the indicator of major discordance in primary diagnosis between ground truth case diagnosis and case diagnosis by each modality, WSI and Glass, separately.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
2,000

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2019

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

4 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 15, 2019

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 18, 2019

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 19, 2019

Completed
2.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 31, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 31, 2021

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

December 22, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

December 22, 2022

Status Verified

November 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

2.4 years

First QC Date

June 18, 2019

Results QC Date

October 31, 2022

Last Update Submit

November 30, 2022

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Major Discordance Rate

    Indpendent reads by four Reading Pathologists (RPs) of both imaging modalitites (8 reads/case) were compared to the original diagnosis ("ground truth" or GT) by an independent adjudication process. This resulted in one of four adjudication outcomes for each read: "Match" (read = GT), "Minor" (minor discordance between read \& GT), "Major" (major discordance between read \& GT), or "Deferred" (read deferred by RP and excluded from the primary endpoint analysis). The outcome measure was the rate at which major discordances occurred for each modality.

    1 day

Study Arms (2)

NanoZoomer Whole Slide Imaging

EXPERIMENTAL

All cases will be assessed via Whole Slide Imaging using the Hamamatsu NanoZoomer S360MD Digital Slide Scanner System to assess pathological characteristics of scanned slides.

Diagnostic Test: Whole Slide Imaging

Glass Slide Light Microscopy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

All cases will be assessed via the use of traditional light microscopy to assess pathological characteristics of glass slides.

Diagnostic Test: Light Microscopy

Interventions

Whole Slide ImagingDIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Scanning of a glass slide to create a digital image that can be viewed on a monitor

Also known as: NanoZoomer Scanning & Imaging
NanoZoomer Whole Slide Imaging
Light MicroscopyDIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Use of traditional light microscopy per institutional standard practice

Glass Slide Light Microscopy

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Cases originating from and that were diagnosed at that local site
  • Cases are available in the site's archive
  • Cases are at least 1 year old since accessioning
  • Cases are selected because their primary diagnosis is consistent with the assigned target categories
  • Cases have a set of slides representative of the primary diagnosis for which it has been selected
  • Slide selection for a given case must meet the following criteria:
  • Slide is obtained by surgical pathology and prepared from FFPE human tissue
  • Slides must be stained with H\&E and accompanying special stains (histochemical and/or immunohistochemical)
  • All special stains slides (histochemical and/or immunohistochemical) where the slide and stain is used for diagnosis, not prognosis.
  • A chosen slide must demonstrate and be representative of the primary diagnosis; 1 slide selection may suffice for biopsy cases,
  • For resection cases, a minimum of 5 slides must be selected, which represent the primary diagnosis. If represented with less than 5 slides, additional slides (primary, secondary, or benign slides) from same case may be used to fulfill minimum number
  • Slide is intact, has correct size/thickness, good edges, undamaged coverslip, without pen markings that can't be removed, no air bubbles, tidy labels, and fulfills the quality checks per the general clinical practice

You may not qualify if:

  • Case does not have relevant slides or if case information necessary for the study is missing
  • Case is still active (less than 1 year old) at the local site
  • Cases for which the control slides for immunohistochemistry and special stains are not available
  • Two cases from same individual
  • Gross-only cases that have no slides
  • Cases that are frozen section, cytology or hematology or immunofluorescence specimens only
  • Case where the only available set of slides have evidence only of secondary or no diagnoses and not the primary diagnosis for which the case is being screened.
  • Slides for a given case will be excluded if they meet the following criterion:
  • Glass slide that is broken, has abnormal size/thickness, beveled edges, poor coverslip (cracks, waviness, scratches), is sticky, has many pen markings or dirt that cannot be removed, contains air bubbles and overhanging labels that can't be corrected, and if stain is severely faded.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (4)

Washington University

St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States

Location

TriCore Reference Laboratories

Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87102, United States

Location

The Cleveland Clinic Foundation

Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States

Location

The Ohio State University

Columbus, Ohio, 43210-1063, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Diagnostic ImagingMicroscopy

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Diagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosisInvestigative Techniques

Results Point of Contact

Title
MCG Manager
Organization
Hamamatsu Photonics, K.K.

Study Officials

  • Liron Pantanowitz

    University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Adjudicators are blinded to the imaging modality.
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
SEQUENTIAL
Model Details: Cases are assessed using both glass slide light microscopy and NanoZoomer digital whole slide imaging in a random order
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 18, 2019

First Posted

June 19, 2019

Study Start

March 15, 2019

Primary Completion

July 31, 2021

Study Completion

July 31, 2021

Last Updated

December 22, 2022

Results First Posted

December 22, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations