Sensory Augmentation Methods in Stroke
SAM
Development of Sensory Augmentation Methods to Improve Post-stroke Gait Stability
1 other identifier
interventional
44
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Many chronic stroke survivors have poor walking balance, contributing to an increased risk of falls and fear of falling. One factor contributing to these balance deficits is a reduced ability to place the feet appropriately when walking. This study investigates whether enhancing the sensory information available to chronic stroke survivors while they walk improves their foot placement accuracy and balance.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for early_phase_1 stroke
Started Apr 2022
Shorter than P25 for early_phase_1 stroke
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 14, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 17, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 4, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 26, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 26, 2023
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 19, 2024
CompletedSeptember 19, 2024
August 1, 2024
1.1 years
June 14, 2019
January 17, 2024
August 13, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Percentage of Participants With Related or Serious Adverse Events
The investigators will monitor the safety of the intervention by quantifying the percentage of participants who experience an adverse event potentially related to the intervention (e.g. skin irritation; falls) or any serious adverse event (e.g. hospitalization; death). This information is gathered through participant self-report, or through communication with participant caregiver if necessary.
Cumulative over the course of the 4-week intervention
Number of Training Sessions Attended
The investigators will assess participant adherence as the number of training sessions attended (out of a maximum possible number of 8).
Cumulative over the course of the 4-week intervention
Intervention Feasibility (Drop-out)
The investigators will assess participant drop-out as the number of participants who do not attend the final Assessment Session.
4-weeks
Change in Mechanics-dependent Adjustment of Paretic Foot Placement
The primary effectiveness measure will be the change in participants' gait stabilization strategy over the course of the 4-week intervention. This will be quantified as the partial correlation between paretic mediolateral foot placement and mediolateral pelvis displacement at the start of the step over a 2-minute period of walking. The investigators will calculate the change in this metric from the initial (Week 0) assessment session to the final (Week 4) assessment session.
4-weeks
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Intervention Feasibility (Walking Time)
Cumulative over the course of the 4-week intervention
Change in Fear of Falling
4-weeks
Change in Functional Gait Assessment Score
4-weeks
Change in Activity-specific Balance Confidence Score
4-weeks
Change in Overground Self-selected Gait Speed
4-weeks
Study Arms (2)
Sensory augmentation
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will complete 8 training sessions over 4 weeks, in which they walk on a treadmill at their self-selected speed. During training sessions, the magnitude of the vibration delivered over the hip abductor musculature will scale with the mechanical state of the pelvis at the start of each step. For example, if the step begins with the pelvis far mediolaterally from the stance foot, the swing leg hip abductors will receive strong vibration. If instead the step begins with the pelvis close mediolaterally to the stance foot, the stance hip abductors will receive strong vibration.
Random vibration
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants will complete 8 training sessions over 4 weeks, in which they walk on a treadmill at their self-selected speed. During training sessions, the magnitude of the vibration applied to the hip abductors will vary randomly (following a normal distribution) on a step-by-step basis.
Interventions
Participants will complete 8 training sessions over 4 weeks, in which they walk on a treadmill at their self-selected speed. During training sessions, the magnitude of the vibration delivered over the hip abductor musculature will scale with the mechanical state of the pelvis at the start of each step. For example, if the step begins with the pelvis far mediolaterally from the stance foot, the swing leg hip abductors will receive strong vibration. If instead the step begins with the pelvis close mediolaterally to the stance foot, the stance hip abductors will receive strong vibration.
Participants will complete 8 training sessions over 4 weeks, in which they walk on a treadmill at their self-selected speed. During training sessions, the magnitude of the vibration applied to the hip abductors will vary randomly (following a normal distribution) on a step-by-step basis.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Experience of a stroke 6 months prior to participation
- Gait speed of at least 0.2 m/s
- Ability to walk on a treadmill without a cane or walker
- Provision of informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Evidence of cerebellar damage
- Resting blood pressure higher than 220/110 mm Hg
- History of congestive heart failure, unstable cardiac arrhythmias, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, severe aortic stenosis, angina or dyspnea at rest or during activities of daily living
- Preexisting neurological disorders or dementia
- Legal blindness or severe visual impairment
- History of DVT or pulmonary embolism within 6 months
- Uncontrolled diabetes with recent weight loss, diabetic coma, or frequent insulin reactions
- Orthopedic injuries or conditions (e.g. joint replacements) in the lower extremities with the potential to alter the gait pattern
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC
Charleston, South Carolina, 29401-5703, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Jesse Dean
- Organization
- Ralph H. Johnson VA
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jesse C. Dean, PhD
Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- early phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- FED
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 14, 2019
First Posted
June 17, 2019
Study Start
April 4, 2022
Primary Completion
April 26, 2023
Study Completion
April 26, 2023
Last Updated
September 19, 2024
Results First Posted
September 19, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
- Time Frame
- Data will be shared 1-month following publication of summary data, and will be shared in perpetuity.
- Access Criteria
- No criteria are anticipated to restrict who de-identified data will be shared with.
De-identified participant data from the assessment sessions (Week 0 and Week 4) will be shared. Specifically, this will include gait biomechanics data (e.g. the partial correlation between mediolateral foot placement and mediolateral pelvis displacement), Functional Gait Assessment scores, Activity-specific Balance Confidence scores, overground gait speeds, and self-reported fear of falling.