Retrievability and Incidence of Complex Retrieval in Celect Versus Denali Filter
1 other identifier
interventional
174
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The primary purpose of this study is to compare the Celect and Denali filters in terms of complicated filter retrieval and indwelling complications after a 2-month indwelling time.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jul 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 26, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 17, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2020
CompletedJune 17, 2019
June 1, 2019
10 months
May 26, 2019
June 13, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Incidence of complicated filter retrieval
Incidence of retrieval cases that require the use of standard retrieval kit (sheath and snare)
2 months after filter placement
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Incidence of penetration
2 months after filter placement
tilt angle
2 months after filter placement
Filter migration
2 months after filter placement
fracture
2 months after filter placement
signs of inferior vena cava occlusion/stenosis
2 months after filter placement
Study Arms (2)
Denali Group
EXPERIMENTALThose who received Denali filter placement
Celect Group
EXPERIMENTALThose who received Celect filter placement
Interventions
Patients who are enrolled in this study are assigned to receive either Denali or Celect filter in the inferior vena cava. All other procedures are the same in both groups
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \. Patients who develop deep venous thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism but are good candidates for anticoagulant therapy
- \. Inferior vena cava filtration before mechanical thrombectomy for deep venous thrombosis
- \. Prophylactic filter placement because of trauma or major surgery
You may not qualify if:
- \. Sepsis
- \. Those who need permanent filter placement
- \. Congenital anatomical anomaly (IVC duplication, interrupted IVC)
- \. patients who need filter placement in the suprarenal inferior vena cava
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Radiology, Severance hospital, Yonsei College of Medicine
Seoul, South Korea
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Participants are blinded to the filter type.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 26, 2019
First Posted
June 17, 2019
Study Start
July 1, 2019
Primary Completion
May 1, 2020
Study Completion
June 1, 2020
Last Updated
June 17, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share