Validation of Rapid Tests for the Serological Diagnosis of HIV in 9 to 24 Months Old Children
Other study identifiers
Sponsor study identifier
observational
502
1 country
1
Study Start
March 12, 2015
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
June 5, 2020
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Study Completion
July 31, 2020
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Brief Summary
Antiretroviral therapy of the mother and of the newborn associated with alternative schemes of breastfeeding can reduce these transmission rates to 1%. The diagnosis of HIV infection in newborns is based on PCR for detection of viral genetic material, a procedure that is expensive and of complex logistics. Tests based on detection of antibodies are faster and cheaper but cannot distinguish infected child or maternal antibodies passed to the fetus through the placenta. Nevertheless, the so-called rapid tests have been implemented in the network of health services because of their simplicity and performance comparable to conventional tests. DPP HIV 1/2 test, produced by Bio-Manguinos/Fiocruz, usage is limited by the manufacturer to over 24 months of age children, though the guidelines control programs already recommend the use from 18 months in Brazil and 9 months in other countries. Data on the accuracy of the rapid test under 24 months of age are scarce. This proposal aims to assess the performance of rapid tests produced by Bio-Manguinhos in diagnostic protocols for HIV infection in children 9-24 months old, in order to obtain empirical data to support the current recommendations on rapid tests, particularly in countries with limited access to tests that require specialized laboratories. The validation of rapid HIV testing in other age groups is a requirement of the national regulatory authorities, and has important implications for programs to control HIV-AIDS in populations from countries with limited access to specialized laboratory resources. The use of the rapid test can also represent a significant reduction in costs, as it allows limiting the use of molecular tests to complex and expensive confirmation cases.
Registry Overview
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
- Recruitment status
- unknown
- Estimated enrollment
- 502 participants
- Study completion date
July 31, 2020
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
- Listed locations
- 1 countries · 1 sites
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Study Timeline
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
Study Start
March 12, 2015
Actual (reported)First Submitted
June 11, 2019
Actual (reported)First Posted
June 13, 2019
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
June 5, 2020
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Study Completion
July 31, 2020
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
- Last Updated
- June 13, 2019
- Status Verified
- June 2019
- Last Update Submitted
- June 11, 2019