Comparing CBT-T to CBT-E in Non-low-weight Adults With Eating Disorders
A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Effectiveness of CBT-T vs CBT-E in a Community Clinic of Individuals With Eating Disorders
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Eating disorders are a difficult to treat illness with significant psychological and physical sequelae. Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) has been the most researched and supported intervention for eating disorders. A particular version of CBT for eating disorders, CBT-E (Fairburn, 2008), has been the focus of much research over the past decade. Despite promising results from initial CBT-E trials these findings have not always replicated well and evidence points to high drop-out in real-world settings. Further, CBT-E is a resource-intensive intervention, which may contribute to poorer access to care. In an attempt to overcome some of these barriers related to CBT-E, Waller and colleagues (2018) recently developed a brief (10 session) version of CBT for non-low-weight eating disorders (e.g., bulimia nervosa and binge eating disorder), referred to as CBT-T. Preliminary evidence from a case series of adult patients suggests that CBT-T has similar efficacy to CBT-E with low rates of drop-out. However, further evaluation of this brief treatment is needed, including direct comparisons with CBT-E. Indeed, given that no comparison group was included in the initial case series, it is unknown whether either CBT-T or CBT-E may be superior to the other. Thus, the aim of the current project is to examine CBT-T's efficacy in comparison to CBT-E as it has been implemented at the eating disorders service at London Health Science's Centre, and to determine whether either intervention is superior based on treatment outcome and treatment drop-out. Non-low-weight individuals with eating disorders assessed at the Adult Eating Disorders Service will be eligible to participate in the study. The principle investigator is Dr. Philip Masson, Ph.D., C. Psych., 519-685-8500 ext. 74866.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 29, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 13, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 15, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2023
CompletedMay 20, 2022
March 1, 2022
1.5 years
May 29, 2019
May 16, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Change in the frequency of Binge Eating
Assessed using EDE (Fairburn, Cooper, \& O'Connor, 2008) objective binge eating frequency for past month. Clients can answer anywhere from 0 binges to an infinite number of binges.
Will be assessed Pre-Treatment; Post-Treatment (On average 10 weeks for CBT-T and 25 weeks for CBT-E), 3, 6, 12, 24 months post treatment. Treatment is on Average 10 weeks for CBT-T and 25 weeks for CBT-E
Change in the frequency of Vomiting
Assessed using EDE (Fairburn, Cooper, \& O'Connor, 2008) vomiting frequency for past month. Clients can answer anywhere from 0 vomiting episodes to an infinite number of vomiting episodes.
Pre-Treatment; Post-Treatment (On average 10 weeks for CBT-T and 25 weeks for CBT-E) 3, 6, 12, 24 months post treatment. Treatment is on Average 10 weeks for CBT-T and 25 weeks for CBT-E
Change in Eating Disorder Cognitions
Assessed using EDE-Q (Fairburn \& Beglin, 2008) Global Score. Lowest possible global score is 0 and highest possible global score is 6. The higher the score the more severe the eating disorder cognitions.
Pre-Treatment; Post-Treatment (On average 10 weeks for CBT-T and 25 weeks for CBT-E), 3, 6, 12, 24 months post treatment. Treatment is on Average 10 weeks for CBT-T and 25 weeks for CBT-E
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Binge Eating Change over the Course of Treatment
Pre-treatment and weekly while receiving treatment. Once a week for up to 10 weeks of treatment for CBT-T and up to 25 weeks of treatment for CBT-E.
Vomiting Change over the Course of Treatment
Pre-treatment and weekly while receiving treatment. Once a week for up to 10 weeks of treatment for CBT-T and up to 25 weeks of treatment for CBT-E.
Working Alliance change over the Course of Treatment
Pre-treatment and weekly while receiving treatment. Once a week for up to 10 weeks of treatment for CBT-T and up to 25 weeks of treatment for CBT-E.
Change in Depression symptoms
Pre-Treatment; Post-Treatment (On average 10 weeks for CBT-T and 25 weeks for CBT-E), 3, 6, 12, 24 months post treatment. Treatment is on Average 10 weeks for CBT-T and 25 weeks for CBT-E
Change in anxiety symptoms
Pre-Treatment; Post-Treatment (On average 10 weeks for CBT-T and 25 weeks for CBT-E), 3, 6, 12, 24 months post treatment. Treatment is on Average 10 weeks for CBT-T and 25 weeks for CBT-E
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
CBT-E
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants will be randomly assigned to one of two conditions (CBT-E or CBT-T). CBT-E will occur over the course of 25 weeks and be delivered as it typically is in the clinic setting of the investigators.
CBT-T
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will be randomly assigned to one of two conditions (CBT-E or CBT-T). Participants who agree to participate will receive 10 weeks of CBT-T.
Interventions
CBT-E is a 20-session transdiagnostic eating disorders treatment based on the principles of cognitive behavioural therapy which has been developed over the past 40 years. The treatment focusses on tracking and modifying eating behaviours, providing psychoeducation, addressing overvaluation of weight and shape, body image, food restriction and restraint, emotion regulation, and relapse prevention.
CBT-T is a 10-session treatment based on cognitive behavioural therapy. It was developed based on clinical experience as well as core components of evidence-based versions of CBT for eating disorders, including CBT-E. The aim of the intervention is to provide only the hypothesized critical elements of CBT for eating disorders so that the interventions can be provided quicker.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Non-underweight (BMI \> 19) adults (aged \> 17 years)
- Diagnosis of bulimia nervosa (BN), binge eating disorder (BED), or otherwise specified feeding or eating disorder (e.g., subthreshold BN, subthreshold BED, purging disorder)
You may not qualify if:
- Imminent risk for suicide
- Profound cognitive impairment
- Limited English language ability
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The Adult Eating Disorders Service
London, Ontario, N6J 1A2, Canada
Related Publications (28)
Berg KC, Peterson CB, Frazier P, Crow SJ. Psychometric evaluation of the eating disorder examination and eating disorder examination-questionnaire: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Eat Disord. 2012 Apr;45(3):428-38. doi: 10.1002/eat.20931. Epub 2011 Jul 8.
PMID: 21744375BACKGROUNDButler, A. C., Beck, A. T., & Cohen, L. H. (2007). The personality belief questionnaire-short form: Development and preliminary findings. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 31, 357-370. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10608-006-9041-x
BACKGROUNDByrne SM, Fursland A, Allen KL, Watson H. The effectiveness of enhanced cognitive behavioural therapy for eating disorders: an open trial. Behav Res Ther. 2011 Apr;49(4):219-26. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2011.01.006. Epub 2011 Jan 27.
PMID: 21345418BACKGROUNDCyders MA, Littlefield AK, Coffey S, Karyadi KA. Examination of a short English version of the UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale. Addict Behav. 2014 Sep;39(9):1372-6. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.02.013. Epub 2014 Mar 3.
PMID: 24636739BACKGROUNDDear BF, Titov N, Sunderland M, McMillan D, Anderson T, Lorian C, Robinson E. Psychometric comparison of the generalized anxiety disorder scale-7 and the Penn State Worry Questionnaire for measuring response during treatment of generalised anxiety disorder. Cogn Behav Ther. 2011;40(3):216-27. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2011.582138. Epub 2011 Jul 20.
PMID: 21770844BACKGROUNDFairburn, C. G. (2008). Cognitive behavior therapy and eating disorders. New York, NY: Guilford.
BACKGROUNDFairburn, C. G., & Beglin, S. J. (2008) Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (6.0). In Fairburn CG. Cognitive Behavior Therapy and Eating Disorders. New York: Guilford Press.
BACKGROUNDFairburn, C. G., Cooper, Z., & O'Connor, M. (2008). Eating Disorder Examination (16.0D). In Fairburn C. G., Cognitive Behavior Therapy and Eating Disorders. New York: Guilford Press.
BACKGROUNDFairburn CG, Cooper Z, Doll HA, O'Connor ME, Bohn K, Hawker DM, Wales JA, Palmer RL. Transdiagnostic cognitive-behavioral therapy for patients with eating disorders: a two-site trial with 60-week follow-up. Am J Psychiatry. 2009 Mar;166(3):311-9. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08040608. Epub 2008 Dec 15.
PMID: 19074978BACKGROUNDFaul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146.
PMID: 17695343BACKGROUNDFaul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):1149-60. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149.
PMID: 19897823BACKGROUNDGeller J, Brown KE, Srikameswaran S, Piper W, Dunn EC. The psychometric properties of the Readiness and Motivation Questionnaire: a symptom-specific measure of readiness for change in the eating disorders. Psychol Assess. 2013 Sep;25(3):759-768. doi: 10.1037/a0032539. Epub 2013 May 6.
PMID: 23647034BACKGROUNDHatcher, R. L., & Gillaspy, J. A. (2006). Development and validation of a revised short version of the working alliance inventory. Psychotherapy Research, 16, 12-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10503300500352500
BACKGROUNDKroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x.
PMID: 11556941BACKGROUNDLatner JD, Mond JM, Kelly MC, Haynes SN, Hay PJ. The Loss of Control Over Eating Scale: development and psychometric evaluation. Int J Eat Disord. 2014 Sep;47(6):647-59. doi: 10.1002/eat.22296. Epub 2014 May 26.
PMID: 24862351BACKGROUNDLowe B, Unutzer J, Callahan CM, Perkins AJ, Kroenke K. Monitoring depression treatment outcomes with the patient health questionnaire-9. Med Care. 2004 Dec;42(12):1194-201. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200412000-00006.
PMID: 15550799BACKGROUNDMoriarty AS, Gilbody S, McMillan D, Manea L. Screening and case finding for major depressive disorder using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9): a meta-analysis. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2015 Nov-Dec;37(6):567-76. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2015.06.012. Epub 2015 Jun 18.
PMID: 26195347BACKGROUNDNewman, M., Zuellig, A. R., Kachin, K. E., Constanitno, M. J., Przeworski, A., Erickson, T., & Cashman-McGrath, L. (2002). Preliminary reliability and validity of the generalized anxiety disorder questionnaire-IV: A revised self-report diagnostic measure of generalized anxiety disorder. Behavior Therapy, 33, 215-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(02)80026-0
BACKGROUND2024 exceptional surveillance of eating disorders: recognition and treatment (NICE guideline NG69) [Internet]. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2024 May 15. No abstract available. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK607987/
PMID: 39405396BACKGROUNDPaap D, Dijkstra PU. Working Alliance Inventory-Short Form Revised. J Physiother. 2017 Apr;63(2):118. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2017.01.001. Epub 2017 Feb 21. No abstract available.
PMID: 28336298BACKGROUNDPellizzer ML, Waller G, Wade TD. Body image flexibility: A predictor and moderator of outcome in transdiagnostic outpatient eating disorder treatment. Int J Eat Disord. 2018 Apr;51(4):368-372. doi: 10.1002/eat.22842. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
PMID: 29457252BACKGROUNDRounsaville BJ, Carroll KM, Onken LS. A stage model of behavioral therapies research: Getting started and moving on from stage I. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice. 2001;8(2):133-142.
BACKGROUNDSpitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Lowe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092.
PMID: 16717171BACKGROUNDTatham M, Turner H, Mountford VA, Tritt A, Dyas R, Waller G. Development, psychometric properties and preliminary clinical validation of a brief, session-by-session measure of eating disorder cognitions and behaviors: The ED-15. Int J Eat Disord. 2015 Nov;48(7):1005-15. doi: 10.1002/eat.22430. Epub 2015 May 26.
PMID: 26011054BACKGROUNDTurner H, Marshall E, Wood F, Stopa L, Waller G. CBT for eating disorders: The impact of early changes in eating pathology on later changes in personality pathology, anxiety and depression. Behav Res Ther. 2016 Feb;77:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2015.11.011. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
PMID: 26690743BACKGROUNDWaller G, Tatham M, Turner H, Mountford VA, Bennetts A, Bramwell K, Dodd J, Ingram L. A 10-session cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT-T) for eating disorders: Outcomes from a case series of nonunderweight adult patients. Int J Eat Disord. 2018 Mar;51(3):262-269. doi: 10.1002/eat.22837. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
PMID: 29417603BACKGROUNDWonderlich SA, Peterson CB, Crosby RD, Smith TL, Klein MH, Mitchell JE, Crow SJ. A randomized controlled comparison of integrative cognitive-affective therapy (ICAT) and enhanced cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT-E) for bulimia nervosa. Psychol Med. 2014 Feb;44(3):543-53. doi: 10.1017/S0033291713001098. Epub 2013 May 23.
PMID: 23701891BACKGROUNDDevelopment of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. The WHOQOL Group. Psychol Med. 1998 May;28(3):551-8. doi: 10.1017/s0033291798006667.
PMID: 9626712BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Elizabeth Phoenix
London Health Sciences Centre
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- At the beginning of client's appointments with the staff psychometrist, patients will be reminded of the study, provided information about the study and asked if to participate in the study. If interest is indicated, then the psychometrist will thoroughly review the letter of information with patients. If patients agree to participate and sign the consent form, study measures will be given. The psychometrist will then inform their assigned therapist that the client wishes to participate in the study. To ensure the psychometrist is not aware of randomization, Philip Masson (study PI) will randomize the client to one of the two interventions using the website random.org. Philip Masson will inform the therapist of the randomization, and the therapist will then proceed with the appropriate treatment intervention. The PI will then keep track of randomization assignment in a separate excel file that the psychometrist does not have access to.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 29, 2019
First Posted
June 13, 2019
Study Start
June 15, 2021
Primary Completion
January 1, 2023
Study Completion
January 1, 2023
Last Updated
May 20, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share