The Use of HE4 With Simple Ultrasound Rules to Predict Malignancy in a Pelvic Mass
The Use of a New Biomarker, HE4, in Combination With Simple Ultrasound Rules in the Prediction of Malignancy in a Pelvic Mass Detected on Ultrasound
1 other identifier
observational
814
1 country
3
Brief Summary
Our objective is to determine if the combination of simple ultrasound features (IOTA simple rules) and a new biomarker (HE4) together with a common tumour marker (CA 125) can accurately predict ovarian cancer in women found to have a pelvic mass on ultrasound. The investigators hypothesize that the use of two biomarkers (HE4 and CA 125) in a mathematical algorithm (Risk of Malignancy Algorithm, ROMA) can be used to predict malignancy in a pelvic mass which has indeterminate ultrasound features. This is a prospective cohort study involving women undergoing operation for a pelvic mass. 720 women scheduled to have an operation to remove a pelvic mass would be recruited from 3 hospitals (QMH, UCH and PYNEH). Pre-operatively, each woman will have an ultrasound assessment using the IOTA simple rules criteria and have blood taken for tumour markers HE4 and CA 125. In women where IOTA ultrasound rules are inconclusive, 2 strategies for prediction will be compared - calculation of risk by ROMA (Strategy A) vs referral for an expert ultrasound (Strategy B). These pre-operative risk predictions will be correlated with the final pathology found at the operations. Main outcome measures include the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive powers for Strategy A compared to Strategy B. Sensitivity and specificity will be compared using the McNemar test. Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC) will be calculated and compared using the Delong method for the 2 strategies. The investigators expect AUC of both strategies will be similar. This would suggest that ROMA can replace expert ultrasound in the pre-operative prediction of ovarian cancer.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Apr 2018
Typical duration for all trials
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 29, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 12, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 10, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 31, 2021
CompletedJune 11, 2021
June 1, 2021
2.4 years
January 29, 2019
June 9, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
sensitivity, specificity and predictive powers
The group of women with inconclusive IOTA assessment will undergo further assessment by both tumour markers assessment by ROMA (Strategy A) and expert ultrasound (Strategy B). The prediction of risk of malignancy (high or low) will be correlated with the final histopathology result from the surgery. The sensitivity, specificity and predictive powers for the 2 strategies will be compared.
3 months after last subject enrolled
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Best method for predicting malignancy in pelvic mass in HK
3 months after last subject enrolled
Accuracy of these 4 different prediction methods in different hospital settings
3 months after last subject enrolled
Performance of IOTA simple rules followed by ROMA (if IOTA inconclusive) in different histological subtypes
3 months after last subject enrolled
Eligibility Criteria
Women found to have a pelvic mass on ultrasound in Hong Kong
You may qualify if:
- Women over the age of 18
- Found to have a pelvic mass on ultrasound, MRI, CT or PET scan
- Scheduled for operation (laparoscopic or open) for a pelvic mass (including ovarian cystectomy and oophorectomy)
- Women who would understand the informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Women who refused a transvaginal scan
- Pregnant women
- Surgical removal is delayed for more than 120 days from the date of the ultrasound examination
- Previous history of ovarian, peritoneal or fallopian tube cancer or unknown malignancy
- History of bilateral oophorectomy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- The University of Hong Konglead
- United Christian Hospitalcollaborator
- Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Hong Kongcollaborator
Study Sites (3)
Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Queen Mary Hospital
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
United Christian Hospital
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 29, 2019
First Posted
June 12, 2019
Study Start
April 1, 2018
Primary Completion
August 10, 2020
Study Completion
August 31, 2021
Last Updated
June 11, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-06