NCT03982836

Brief Summary

The digestive process begins in the mouth and follows in the stomach and intestine. In the stomach the food is mixed with the gastric juices forming the chyme. To mix the food with the gastric juice as well as to provide gastric emptying (GE), the movements of the stomach are of great importance. Intestinal transit time is understood of the combination of GE, small intestine transit and colon transit time. The composition of the diet (lipid and protein content) exerts a direct influence on intestinal transit time due to the stimulation of hormone secretion, cholecystokinin and gastrin, respectively, which act to decrease GE velocity. In this context, it is also observed an important influence of dietary fibers on the speed of GE. Despite all knowledge about dietary fibers, information on such compounds still has many controversies. Due to the difficulty of finding compounds that fit into only one specific category (viscous, fermentable or prebiotic) there is difficulty in establishing a concept that best defines what are dietary fibers. The CODEX Alimentarius Commission in 2009 defined dietary fibers as carbohydrate polymers composed of ten or more monomer units of this macronutrient, which are not hydrolyzed by enzymes in the human intestine. Dietary fibers can be classified into insoluble and soluble according to the ability to bind to water molecules and form gels. Soluble fibers, especially those classified as prebiotic, in the intestine are fermented by bacteria giving rise to short chain fatty acids (SCFA). The SCFA stimulates the production and secretion of PYY and GLP-1 are associated with inhibition of gastric motility. Due to the importance of knowing the intestinal transit time, several methods have been developed, but scintigraphy is the gold standard technique for this analysis. Given the above and controversies present in the literature on the dietary fibers, there was a shortage of studies with the objective of evaluating the impact of different dietary fibers in intestinal transit time. This study shows relevant to help elucidate the behavior of different dietary fibers in intestinal transit time, offering data for correct and safe use of dietary fibers in various clinical situations. The hypothesis of this study is that the partially hydrolyzed guar gum delays the time of gastric emptying and intestinal transit, being this effect not observed for fructooligosaccharide

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
25

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2018

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 21, 2018

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 13, 2019

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 21, 2019

Completed
22 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 12, 2019

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 30, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

September 19, 2025

Status Verified

September 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

May 21, 2019

Last Update Submit

September 15, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Gastric EmptyingScintigraphyIntestinal Transit TimePrebioticSoluble Dietary FiberTechnetium-99m

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Gastric Emptying Time and intestinal transit time

    The impact of the fibers under the gastric emptying and intestinal transit time is evaluated after the volunteer performs the ingestion of the 3 modules on different days.

    After the 3rd day of the protocol

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Intestinal Hormones Concentrations

    Up to 3 weeks after protocol termination

  • Compare gastric emptying and intestinal transit times between dietary fiber types

    Up to 3 weeks after protocol termination

Study Arms (3)

Fructooligosaccharide

EXPERIMENTAL

All the 25 volunteers received the sandwich containing 20 grams of fructooligosaccharide

Dietary Supplement: Soluble Dietary Fibers

Partially hydrolyzed guar gum

EXPERIMENTAL

All the 25 volunteers received the sandwich containing 20 grams of partially hydrolyzed guar gum

Dietary Supplement: Soluble Dietary Fibers

Maltodextrin

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

All the 25 volunteers received the sandwich containing 20 grams of Maltodextrin

Dietary Supplement: Soluble Dietary Fibers

Interventions

Soluble Dietary FibersDIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

All 25 volunteers received, were separated for 7 days of washout, one containing maltodextrin (control), Frutooligossacharide or guar gum partially hydrolyzed in a randomized manner. As the partially hydrolyzed guar gum and fructooligosaccharide, soluble dietary fibers that present different behaviors in the body.

Also known as: Prebiotic, Partially hydrolyzed guar gum
FructooligosaccharideMaltodextrinPartially hydrolyzed guar gum

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 40 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Healthy volunteers;
  • Both sexes;
  • Age Range:From 18 to 40 years old
  • Volunteers who do not have gluten or egg restriction
  • No history or diagnosis of gastrointestinal diseases;
  • Had not undergone recent operations that compromised intestinal transit time and / or gastric emptying.

You may not qualify if:

  • Volunteers who used prebiotic, probiotic and / or symbiotic volunteers at least 10 days prior to study day;
  • Volunteers diagnosed with hypothyroidism and / or diabetes or who reported hypoglycemia and not tolerance to fasting;
  • Women were asked about pregnancy, suspected pregnancy, use of contraceptive methods and menstrual cycle. If there was any possibility of pregnancy, based on these questions, the volunteer was excluded from the study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Escola de Enfermagem - UFMG

Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, 30130-100, Brazil

Location

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Prebiotics

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Dietary FiberDietary CarbohydratesCarbohydratesPolysaccharides, BacterialPolysaccharidesFoodDiet, Food, and NutritionPhysiological PhenomenaDietary SupplementsFood and Beverages

Study Officials

  • Simone V Generoso

    Federal University of Minas Gerais

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
All subjects involved with this study will be masked. The masking was revealed only after the analysis of the results obtained.
Purpose
BASIC SCIENCE
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Model Details: It is a cross-sectional study, where the volunteer should attend the study area on three different days with a minimum washout of 7 days, each day receiving a sandwich containing one of the modules studied in a randomized manner (Partially Hydrolyzed Guar Gum, Fructooligosaccharide or Maltodextrin) and will be instructed to ingest this sandwich in the maximum time of 10 minutes. The volunteers should on an 8-hour fast. Samples of blood will be collected in the fasting, 60 and 180 minutes after the injection of the sandwich for intestinal hormone dosage.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 21, 2019

First Posted

June 12, 2019

Study Start

July 21, 2018

Primary Completion

April 13, 2019

Study Completion

September 30, 2019

Last Updated

September 19, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations