NCT03982264

Brief Summary

Cap-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR-C) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) have both been reported to be effective treatment methods for small rectal neuroendocrine tumor (NET) in limited studies. Which one is better has not been determined. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of EMR-C and ESD for the treatment of small rectal NET.

Trial Health

35
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
90

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2019

Typical duration for not_applicable

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 5, 2019

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 11, 2019

Completed
9 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 20, 2019

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 20, 2020

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 20, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

June 11, 2019

Status Verified

June 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

1.5 years

First QC Date

June 5, 2019

Last Update Submit

June 10, 2019

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • complete resection rate(R0 rate)

    Complete resection was defined as negative horizontal and vertical margins of specimen.

    within 14 days after procedure

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • operating time

    intraoperative

  • complications rate

    within 14 days after procedure

  • length of stay

    within 14 days after procedure

  • hospitalization cost

    within 14 days after procedure

  • recurrence rate

    one year after procedure

Study Arms (2)

ESD group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

In ESD group, enrolled patients will receive the treatment modality of ESD to remove the rectal NET

Procedure: ESD procedure

EMR-C group

EXPERIMENTAL

In EMR-C group, enrolled patients will receive the treatment modality of EMR-C to remove the rectal NET

Procedure: EMR-C procedure

Interventions

ESD procedurePROCEDURE

ESD were all performed as the standard procedure that has been widely described and used. A diluted sodium hyaluronate solution was injected submucosally. Mucosal incision and submucosal dissection were performed by using either Hook knife (Olympus Medical, Japan) or a dual-knife (Olympus Medical, Japan) . After the resection was finished, all of the visible vessels on the artificial ulcer bed were thoroughly coagulated with argon plasma coagulation to prevent postoperative bleeding.

ESD group

A transparent cap (MH-593; Olympus) was attached to the forward-viewing endoscope. After the endoscope was inserted to the rectum, the snare passed through the sheath and was looped along the inner lip of the cap. The tumor was then suctioned into the cap and the snare was pushed off and closed. After confirming the appropriate snare placement, both the tumor and the overlying mucosa were resected by electric cautery (Endocut Q, effect 2, VIO 200D; ERBE, Tübingen, Germany), and then the removed tumor was sent for pathological examination. Endoscopic examination then was repeated without the transparent cap in order to evaluate the wound carefully in case there was any perforation or bleeding and to ensure the absence of the residual tumor tissues. If there was spurting bleeding or active bleeding, hot forceps were usually to stop the bleeding.

EMR-C group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age from 18 to 75 years;
  • Definite diagnosis of rectal NET less than 10mm;
  • Patients plan to receive either EMR-C or ESD treatment.

You may not qualify if:

  • Serious comorbid diseases such as advanced malignant tumor and organ failure;
  • Patients received conventional EMR, snare electrotomy and no treatment;
  • Rectal NET with metastasis;
  • Pregnant patient;
  • Poor compliance

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (1)

  • Gao X, Huang S, Wang Y, Peng Q, Li W, Zou Y, Han Z, Cai J, Luo Y, Ye Y, Li A, Bai Y, Chen Y, Liu S, Li Y. Modified Cap-Assisted Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Versus Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for the Treatment of Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors </=10 mm: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2022 Dec 1;117(12):1982-1989. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001914. Epub 2022 Aug 23.

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 5, 2019

First Posted

June 11, 2019

Study Start

June 20, 2019

Primary Completion

December 20, 2020

Study Completion

December 20, 2021

Last Updated

June 11, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-06