NCT03979196

Brief Summary

The presence of short cervix during pregnancy is a risk factor for preterm birth though in many cases women will eventually deliver at term or near term. While there are proven treatments such as cerclage and progesterone that can improve pregnancy outcomes, many women are advised to limit their activity, are put on bed rest, or admitted to hospital for inpatient management. Presently, there is no evidence that hospital admission of women with short cervix is beneficial and prolongs the pregnancy. The investigators propose to examine whether inpatient management results in comparable outcomes to outpatient management for women with short cervix.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
5

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2019

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 5, 2019

Completed
1 day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 6, 2019

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 7, 2019

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 30, 2020

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 7, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

April 22, 2024

Status Verified

April 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

10 months

First QC Date

June 5, 2019

Last Update Submit

April 19, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Preterm BirthPregnancy, High RiskShort Cervix

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Gestational age at delivery

    At delivery

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Betamethasone treatment

    Before delivery

  • Magnesium sulphate treatment

    Before 32 weeks gestation

  • Intrapartum complications

    During delivery

  • Mode of delivery

    At delivery

  • Patient Quality of Life

    1 week after randomization

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Inpatient Management

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Women in this arm will follow the standard of care for admission to high-risk units at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre or North York General Hospital.

Other: Inpatient Management

Outpatient Management

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Women in this arm will be encouraged to follow the standard of care established in the high-risk clinics at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre or North York General Hospital.

Other: Outpatient Management

Interventions

Admission for a minimum of three days, administration of betamethasone, and clinical reassessment by obstetrician after three days. After the initial three day admission, further management will be at the discretion of their obstetrician who will continue their care and decide if further admissions are needed. Weekly cervical length assessment will be performed until 28 weeks and patient readmission will be decided by their Obstetrician. Post-intervention, women in both arms will receive the same standard of care (weekly clinic or inpatient follow-up appointments) and will be followed to delivery. Prior to delivery, participants will complete a patient Quality of Life survey and at delivery, primary and secondary outcomes will be collected.

Inpatient Management

Avoid heavy lifting and core exercise, avoid intercourse, weekly assessment of cervical length by ultrasound and administration of betamethasone. Patients will continue with outpatient management for the remainder of their pregnancy with no admission unless the patient develops contractions, PPROM, bleeding, or the cervix is dilated to ≥1cm. Post-intervention, women in both arms will receive the same standard of care (weekly clinic or inpatient follow-up appointments) and will be followed to delivery. Prior to delivery, participants will complete a patient Quality of Life survey and at delivery, primary and secondary outcomes will be collected.

Outpatient Management

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Singleton pregnancy between 23 weeks 0 days - 28 weeks 6 days gestational age
  • SC (≤1.5cm) determined by TVS
  • Vaginal progesterone treatment
  • Cervical dilatation of ≤1cm
  • Located within 45 minute drive from recruitment site (Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre or North York General Hospital)

You may not qualify if:

  • Multiple pregnancy
  • Preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM), vaginal bleeding, infection, high blood pressure (defined as 140/90 mm Hg or higher)
  • Regular uterine contractions or active labour
  • Vaginal bleeding
  • Cervical dilatation of \>1cm
  • Fetal anomalies

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

North York General Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, M2K 1E1, Canada

Location

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5, Canada

Location

Related Publications (30)

  • Menon R. Preterm birth: a global burden on maternal and child health. Pathog Glob Health. 2012 Jul;106(3):139-40. doi: 10.1179/204777312X13462106637729. No abstract available.

    PMID: 23265368BACKGROUND
  • Blencowe H, Lee AC, Cousens S, Bahalim A, Narwal R, Zhong N, Chou D, Say L, Modi N, Katz J, Vos T, Marlow N, Lawn JE. Preterm birth-associated neurodevelopmental impairment estimates at regional and global levels for 2010. Pediatr Res. 2013 Dec;74 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):17-34. doi: 10.1038/pr.2013.204.

    PMID: 24366461BACKGROUND
  • Blencowe H, Cousens S, Oestergaard MZ, Chou D, Moller AB, Narwal R, Adler A, Vera Garcia C, Rohde S, Say L, Lawn JE. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of preterm birth rates in the year 2010 with time trends since 1990 for selected countries: a systematic analysis and implications. Lancet. 2012 Jun 9;379(9832):2162-72. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60820-4.

    PMID: 22682464BACKGROUND
  • Alexander GR, Kogan M, Bader D, Carlo W, Allen M, Mor J. US birth weight/gestational age-specific neonatal mortality: 1995-1997 rates for whites, hispanics, and blacks. Pediatrics. 2003 Jan;111(1):e61-6. doi: 10.1542/peds.111.1.e61.

    PMID: 12509596BACKGROUND
  • Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Understanding Premature Birth and Assuring Healthy Outcomes; Behrman RE, Butler AS, editors. Preterm Birth: Causes, Consequences, and Prevention. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2007. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK11362/

    PMID: 20669423BACKGROUND
  • Lawn JE, Cousens S, Zupan J; Lancet Neonatal Survival Steering Team. 4 million neonatal deaths: when? Where? Why? Lancet. 2005 Mar 5-11;365(9462):891-900. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71048-5.

    PMID: 15752534BACKGROUND
  • McCormick MC. The contribution of low birth weight to infant mortality and childhood morbidity. N Engl J Med. 1985 Jan 10;312(2):82-90. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198501103120204.

    PMID: 3880598BACKGROUND
  • Berkowitz GS, Papiernik E. Epidemiology of preterm birth. Epidemiol Rev. 1993;15(2):414-43. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036128. No abstract available.

    PMID: 8174665BACKGROUND
  • Iams JD, Goldenberg RL, Meis PJ, Mercer BM, Moawad A, Das A, Thom E, McNellis D, Copper RL, Johnson F, Roberts JM. The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit Network. N Engl J Med. 1996 Feb 29;334(9):567-72. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199602293340904.

    PMID: 8569824BACKGROUND
  • Berghella V, Kuhlman K, Weiner S, Texeira L, Wapner RJ. Cervical funneling: sonographic criteria predictive of preterm delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Sep;10(3):161-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1997.10030161.x.

    PMID: 9339522BACKGROUND
  • Berghella V, Roman A, Daskalakis C, Ness A, Baxter JK. Gestational age at cervical length measurement and incidence of preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Aug;110(2 Pt 1):311-7. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000270112.05025.1d.

    PMID: 17666605BACKGROUND
  • Crane JM, Hutchens D. Transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length to predict preterm birth in asymptomatic women at increased risk: a systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008 May;31(5):579-87. doi: 10.1002/uog.5323.

    PMID: 18412093BACKGROUND
  • Goldenberg RL, Iams JD, Das A, Mercer BM, Meis PJ, Moawad AH, Miodovnik M, VanDorsten JP, Caritis SN, Thurnau GR, Dombrowski MP, Roberts JM, McNellis D. The Preterm Prediction Study: sequential cervical length and fetal fibronectin testing for the prediction of spontaneous preterm birth. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Mar;182(3):636-43. doi: 10.1067/mob.2000.104212.

    PMID: 10739521BACKGROUND
  • Guzman ER, Walters C, Ananth CV, O'Reilly-Green C, Benito CW, Palermo A, Vintzileos AM. A comparison of sonographic cervical parameters in predicting spontaneous preterm birth in high-risk singleton gestations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Sep;18(3):204-10. doi: 10.1046/j.0960-7692.2001.00526.x.

    PMID: 11555447BACKGROUND
  • Heath VC, Southall TR, Souka AP, Elisseou A, Nicolaides KH. Cervical length at 23 weeks of gestation: prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Nov;12(5):312-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1998.12050312.x.

    PMID: 9819868BACKGROUND
  • Owen J. Evaluation of the cervix by ultrasound for the prediction of preterm birth. Clin Perinatol. 2003 Dec;30(4):735-55. doi: 10.1016/s0095-5108(03)00103-9.

    PMID: 14714921BACKGROUND
  • Ozdemir I, Demirci F, Yucel O, Erkorkmaz U. Ultrasonographic cervical length measurement at 10-14 and 20-24 weeks gestation and the risk of preterm delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007 Feb;130(2):176-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.03.021. Epub 2006 May 8.

    PMID: 16682111BACKGROUND
  • Cicero S, Skentou C, Souka A, To MS, Nicolaides KH. Cervical length at 22-24 weeks of gestation: comparison of transvaginal and transperineal-translabial ultrasonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Apr;17(4):335-40. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2001.00345.x.

    PMID: 11339192BACKGROUND
  • Yazici G, Yildiz A, Tiras MB, Arslan M, Kanik A, Oz U. Comparison of transperineal and transvaginal sonography in predicting preterm delivery. J Clin Ultrasound. 2004 Jun;32(5):225-30. doi: 10.1002/jcu.20027.

    PMID: 15124188BACKGROUND
  • Andersen HF, Nugent CE, Wanty SD, Hayashi RH. Prediction of risk for preterm delivery by ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Sep;163(3):859-67. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(90)91084-p.

    PMID: 2206073BACKGROUND
  • Hassan SS, Romero R, Vidyadhari D, Fusey S, Baxter JK, Khandelwal M, Vijayaraghavan J, Trivedi Y, Soma-Pillay P, Sambarey P, Dayal A, Potapov V, O'Brien J, Astakhov V, Yuzko O, Kinzler W, Dattel B, Sehdev H, Mazheika L, Manchulenko D, Gervasi MT, Sullivan L, Conde-Agudelo A, Phillips JA, Creasy GW; PREGNANT Trial. Vaginal progesterone reduces the rate of preterm birth in women with a sonographic short cervix: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jul;38(1):18-31. doi: 10.1002/uog.9017. Epub 2011 Jun 15.

    PMID: 21472815BACKGROUND
  • Jarde A, Lutsiv O, Park CK, Beyene J, Dodd JM, Barrett J, Shah PS, Cook JL, Saito S, Biringer AB, Sabatino L, Giglia L, Han Z, Staub K, Mundle W, Chamberlain J, McDonald SD. Effectiveness of progesterone, cerclage and pessary for preventing preterm birth in singleton pregnancies: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. BJOG. 2017 Jul;124(8):1176-1189. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14624. Epub 2017 Apr 17.

    PMID: 28276151BACKGROUND
  • Sotiriadis A, Papatheodorou S, Kavvadias A, Makrydimas G. Transvaginal cervical length measurement for prediction of preterm birth in women with threatened preterm labor: a meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Jan;35(1):54-64. doi: 10.1002/uog.7457.

    PMID: 20014326BACKGROUND
  • Sosa C, Althabe F, Belizan J, Bergel E. Bed rest in singleton pregnancies for preventing preterm birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(1):CD003581. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003581.pub2.

    PMID: 14974024BACKGROUND
  • Fox NS, Jean-Pierre C, Predanic M, Chasen ST. Does hospitalization prevent preterm delivery in the patient with a short cervix? Am J Perinatol. 2007 Jan;24(1):49-53. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-958164. Epub 2006 Dec 27.

    PMID: 17195150BACKGROUND
  • Grobman WA, Gilbert SA, Iams JD, Spong CY, Saade G, Mercer BM, Tita ATN, Rouse DJ, Sorokin Y, Leveno KJ, Tolosa JE, Thorp JM, Caritis SN, Peter Van Dorsten J; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units (MFMU) Network*. Activity restriction among women with a short cervix. Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jun;121(6):1181-1186. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182917529.

    PMID: 23812450BACKGROUND
  • Shea AK, Simpson AN, Barrett J, Ladhani N, Nevo O. Pregnancy Outcomes of Women Admitted to a Tertiary Care Centre with Short Cervix. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2017 May;39(5):328-334. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2017.01.012.

    PMID: 28454755BACKGROUND
  • Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473-83.

    PMID: 1593914BACKGROUND
  • Provencher et al. Fertility: Overview, 2012 to 2016. Reports on the Demographic Situation in Canada. 2018; Catalogue no. 91-209-X.

    BACKGROUND
  • Copyright © 2013, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.

    BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Premature Birth

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Obstetric Labor, PrematureObstetric Labor ComplicationsPregnancy ComplicationsFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital Diseases

Study Officials

  • Ori Nevo, MD

    Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 5, 2019

First Posted

June 7, 2019

Study Start

June 6, 2019

Primary Completion

March 30, 2020

Study Completion

September 7, 2021

Last Updated

April 22, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations