Modeling Clinical Failure in Prostate Cancer Patients Based on a Two-stage Statistical Model
PREDYC
1 other identifier
observational
2,384
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Biomarker series can indicate disease progression and predict clinical endpoints. When a treatment is prescribed depending on the biomarker, confounding by indication might be introduced if the treatment modifies the marker profile and risk of failure. The two-stage model fitted within a Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo framework is particularly flexible to account for such data. Prostate-specific antigens in prostate cancer patients treated with external beam radiation therapy can be monitored. In the presence of rising prostate-specific antigens after external beam radiation therapy, salvage hormone therapy can be prescribed to reduce both the prostate-specific antigens concentration and the risk of clinical failure, an illustration of confounding by indication. The prognostic value of hormone therapy and prostate-specific antigens trajectory on the risk of failure based on a two-stage model within a Bayesian framework to assess the role of the prostate-specific antigens profile on clinical failure while accounting for a secondary treatment prescribed by indication. the aim of this research is to model prostate specific antigens using a hierarchical piecewise linear trajectory with a random changepoint. Residual prostate-specific antigens variability can be expressed as a function of prostate-specific antigens concentration. Covariates in the survival model can include : hormone therapy, baseline characteristics, and individual predictions of the prostate-specific antigens nadir and timing and prostate-specific antigens slopes before and after the nadir as provided by the longitudinal process.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jan 2010
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 4, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 7, 2019
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 21, 2020
CompletedJanuary 25, 2021
December 1, 2020
7 years
June 4, 2019
November 25, 2020
December 30, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants With Clinical Failure After Initiation of Radiotherapy
Clinical failure is defined as any of the following events following initiation of radiotherapy: distant metastases, nodal recurrence, or any palpable or biopsy-detected local recurrence three years after radiation; any local recurrence within three years of RT if the most previous PSA was\>2 ng/ml; and death from prostate cancer.
within 10 years following initiation of radiotherapy
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants With Initiation of Salvage Therapy After Radiotherapy
within 10 years following initiation of radiotherapy
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Dataset of 2384 men included in three cohorts: University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA (UM); Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG 9406); and William Beaumont Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.
You may qualify if:
- clinically localized prostate cancer
- Clinical stage T1 to T4
- Node and metastasis negative
- Treated with external beam radiation therapy (RT).
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with baseline or planned hormonotherapy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
INSERM
Bordeaux, France
Related Publications (1)
Bellera C, Proust-Lima C, Joseph L, Richaud P, Taylor J, Sandler H, Hanley J, Mathoulin-Pelissier S. A two-stage model in a Bayesian framework to estimate a survival endpoint in the presence of confounding by indication. Stat Methods Med Res. 2018 Apr;27(4):1271-1281. doi: 10.1177/0962280216660127. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
PMID: 27587597RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr Carine Bellera
- Organization
- Institut Bergonié
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Carine Bellera, PhD
Institut Bergonié
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 4, 2019
First Posted
June 7, 2019
Study Start
January 1, 2010
Primary Completion
January 1, 2017
Study Completion
January 1, 2017
Last Updated
January 25, 2021
Results First Posted
December 21, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-12