Postoperative Evaluation of the Intraoral Technique of Buccal Fat Pad Removal
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In recent years there has been a growing number of procedures for the removal of the buccal fat pad (BFP) or as frequently referred to as bichectomy. Buccal fat pad removal can be used as part of the therapeutic procedure in cases of: sinus buco fistulas, peri-orbital defects, congenital palatal fissure, patients with severe bruxism, patients with constant lesions caused by bites on the jugal mucosa and in patients who are dissatisfied with the facial contour. In cases of thinning of the face, biting lesions and bruxism, total or partial of the BFP removal is performed, always taking into account a facial harmonization. The aim of the present study was to demonstrate the procedure of BFP removal and its respective postoperative period. A total of 40 BFP removal surgeries were performed between 2016 and 2017 with intraoral access technique. After the bichectomy procedure the subjects were followed for: 4, 7, 10, 15, 30, and 90 days. The postoperative period can be compared to that of a third molar extraction, and the use of analgesics and anti-inflammatories can adequately control the pain symptomatology. Edema and mouth opening limited for about 15 days were the most commonly found alterations in surgeries performed. The surgical technique is a simple and safe procedure provided by trained and experienced professionals. The bichectomy should be performed following a precise indication and the procedure is becoming a new area of practice for the dental surgeon, who can perform the procedure safely, reliably and with aesthetic and therapeutic results provided that with precise indications.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2016
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 30, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 5, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 25, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 4, 2019
CompletedJune 5, 2019
June 1, 2019
1.7 years
May 25, 2019
June 3, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Limitation of mouth opening after the surgical procedure
to evaluate during the post-operative period the limitation of mouth opening, by means of manual pachymeter, and measured in millimeters.
90 days
presence of local edema
to evaluate in the post-operative period the presence of local edema. the presence of local edema will be verified through the patient's report, and the researcher's preservation through the photographs obtained in the preoperative period.
90 days
The facial contour was modified in the malar region after the surgical procedure.
photographs obtained before and after the surgical procedure will be placed in the PortraitPro 11 software and assessed for facial contour. The observed difference will be measured in millimeters
90 days
Study Arms (1)
BFP removal
EXPERIMENTALthis will be the group evaluated in this study, individuals who performed the BFP removal procedure.
Interventions
The surgical procedure was performed using the technique with intrabuccal access, already consecrated in the literature (Materasso 2006). The Bichat fat ball access was made by means of a small incision no more than 3 mm in length in the soft tissue located in the lower aspect of the zygomatic counterfoot, taking care to visualize and protect with the retractor the Stensen's conduit. With the aid of blunt-tipped or hemostatic scissors dissection was performed, taking care to preserve the membrane surrounding the ball of fat. After removal of one side, pressure was removed to remove air and the procedure was started on the opposite side, after the removal of the two sides was realized simple suture with silk thread. There were no formal indications for sending the samples for anatomic and / or histological examination.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients with constant lesions caused by bites on the jugal mucosa
- patients who are dissatisfied with the facial contour.
You may not qualify if:
- any systemic problem
- altered blood tests
- presence of oral infection
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Caio Vinicius Gonçalves Roman Torres
Santos, São Paulo, 11015001, Brazil
Related Publications (2)
Matarasso A. Managing the buccal fat pad. Aesthet Surg J. 2006 May-Jun;26(3):330-6. doi: 10.1016/j.asj.2006.03.009.
PMID: 19338917BACKGROUNDMatarasso A. Commentary on: Buccal Fat Pad Excision: Hydrodissection Technique. Aesthet Surg J. 2019 Sep 13;39(10):1046-1047. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjz086. No abstract available.
PMID: 31073600RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
CAIO VINICIUS GONÇALVES R TORRES
Universidade Metropolitana de Santos
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 25, 2019
First Posted
June 4, 2019
Study Start
April 1, 2016
Primary Completion
December 30, 2017
Study Completion
May 5, 2019
Last Updated
June 5, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
the study participants allowed the use of data only for this study and for this researcher