Study of Electrical Prognostic Factors of Response to Intravenous Immunoglobulin Treatment in Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy
PRONELEC PIDC
1 other identifier
observational
42
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (PIDC) is an acquired dysimmune polyneuropathy whose prevalence is estimated to be between 1 to 4 per 100,000 depending on the study, with an incidence of less than 1 per 100,000 per year. The clinical presentation of PIDC is heterogeneous, characterized by a symmetrical lesion predominating generally on large fibers, the most myelinated, responsible for ataxia and a motor deficit in the foreground. In the typical form, patients describe a proximal and distal motor or sensory deficit associated with isflexia that signifies a peripheral neurogenic syndrome. The physiopathological hypothesis is that of an inflammation responsible for demyelinating nerve fibers, which results in electroneuromyogram (ENMG) by conduction abnormalities and histologically when a neuromuscular biopsy is performed by segmental demyelination. Given the heterogeneity of the clinical presentation, electrical diagnostic criteria are proposed by the European Federation of Neurological Society in order to classify IPDCs into three categories: certain, probable and possible. In the absence of sufficient criteria to make the diagnosis of IPDC, it is also possible to use criteria of support, using a paraclinical report including the presence of an increase in protein (hyperproteinorachie) without cells for cerebrospinal fluid analysis, visualization of radicular inflammation on imaging (MRI of lumbar and / or brachial plexus), proximal peripheral involvement with somatosensory evoked potentials. Therapeutically, a joint management between rehabilitation and the introduction of a background treatment allows the clinical improvement of certain patients. To date, the treatments proposed in first intention are corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) and plasma exchanges. In fact, the efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulins has been widely shown by controlled and randomized therapeutic trials. Efficacy studies of IVIg in the literature are most often based on an assessment of clinical response after 24 weeks, but in clinical practice the response to treatment and continuation of treatment is often evaluated after 3 courses of treatment with the help of a clinical evaluation and the realization of an electroneuromyogram. These are administered in day hospitalization or traditional hospitalization, every four weeks, to patients whose diagnosis of PIDC has been established by electroneuromyogram according to the EFNS criteria. Clinical prognostic factors for good response to IVIG therapy have been described in previous studies, including subacute disease, symmetrical involvement, and absence of amyotrophy. In order to optimize the management of IPDCs, it is important to identify patients who respond to IVIg. Thus, the objective of our study is to look at the electroneuromyogram, the presence of electrical predictors of good response to treatment with IVIg.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Jul 2019
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 24, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 30, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 17, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 31, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 28, 2021
CompletedMarch 31, 2022
March 1, 2022
1.3 years
May 24, 2019
March 30, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Identify electromyographic predictors of treatment response
This corresponds to highlight, in the data of the electroneuromyogram performed before the initiation of treatment with IVIg, differences between the responder groups or not treatment \[decrease of at least 1 point in the ONLS score\], i.e three courses of IVIG.
Week 24
Secondary Outcomes (2)
study of the demographic characteristics of patients followed for IPDC and treated with IVIg
Week 24
Clinical evidence of response to IVIG treatment
Week 24
Eligibility Criteria
Patients with IPDC, hospitalized in a traditional hospital ward or week hospital or day hospital, who received at least 3 courses of IVIG under IPDC between January 2014 and March 2019
You may qualify if:
- Patients whose age is ≥ 18 years
- Patients with IPDC
- Patients hospitalized in a traditional hospital ward or week hospital or day hospital
- Patients who received at least 3 courses of IVIG under IPDC between January 2014 and March 2019
- Francophone patients
You may not qualify if:
- Patients under guardianship or curatorship
- Patients deprived of their liberty
- Patients who oppose the use of their data for this research
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph
Paris, 75014, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Pauline REACH, MD
Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 24, 2019
First Posted
May 30, 2019
Study Start
July 17, 2019
Primary Completion
October 31, 2020
Study Completion
October 28, 2021
Last Updated
March 31, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-03