Transepidermal Application of Metilaminolevulinate in Daylight PDT in the Treatment of Photodamaged Skin
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Chronic sun exposure enhances the incidence of cutaneous neoplasms (NMSC - non melanoma skin cancer), wrinkles, roughness, telangiectasia and irregular pigmentation of the skin. Nowadays, actinic keratosis (AK) are considered in situ squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and should be managed that way. Conventional topical Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has proven its efficacy on treatment of AK and cancerization field. PDT's action in global improvement of photodamaged skin, texture, pigmentation and reduction of wrinkles has been well documented in literature. Immunohistochemical and histopathological essays describe the hypothesis of conventional PDT's mechanisms of action in photoaging by dermal remodeling, with enhancement of collagen, statiscally significant. Daylight-Photodynamic Therapy (DL-PDT) is a new modality that keeps the efficacy of topical PDT in treatment of AK and cancerization field, but painless and more practically. Until this moment, there is no report of DL-PDT efficacy on photorejuvenation and actinic keratosis evaluated by clinical, histopathological and immunohistochemical studies. The investigator's aim is to evaluate the alterations induced by isolated DLPDT or DLPDT associated with other techniques of transepidermal drug delivery (microneedles, CO2 laser and microdermabrasion) in the treatment of field cancerization in photodamaged skin with actinic keratosis, through clinical evaluation, histopathological and immunohistochemical studies. It is an interventional, prospective, randomized controlled, parallels-groups, four-arm trial with 1:1 allocation ratio study performed in forty patients attended at the Dermatology Service of Hospital Universitário Antonio Pedro- Universidade Federal Fluminense.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 3, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 5, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 23, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 28, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2020
CompletedJanuary 19, 2021
January 1, 2021
1.8 years
April 23, 2019
January 13, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Quantitative clinical evaluation of Actinic keratoses
Numbers of Actinic keratoses on the face: count of lesions before treatment and one month/three months/six months after the second session.
6 months
Qualitative clinical evaluation of Actinic keratoses
Actinic keratoses will be classified by degrees of thickness (grades 1, 2 and 3), based on the Olsen scale (J Am Acad Dermatol. 1991 May;24(5 Pt 1):738-43), before treatment and one month/three months/six months after the second session.
6 months
Qualitative evaluation of global clinical skin change
The overall improvement of photodanificated skin was evaluated using the GAIS scale (Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale) which ranges from: 1 = very much improvement; 2 = marked improvement; 3 = improved; 4 = no change; 5 = worse. Also performed before treatment and one month/three months/six months after the second session.
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Histological evaluation: Routine stain - haematoxylin and eosin
1 year
Histological evaluation: Special stains (Orcein and Picrosirius)
1 year
Immunohistochemistry: epidermis and dermis
1 year
Study Arms (4)
Group I (Standard DL-PDT)
ACTIVE COMPARATOR1. Superficial skin curettage all face with a dermatological curette 2. All exposed skin was covered with pure chemical sunscreen 3. After 15 minutes, a uniform layer of methyl-aminolevulinate (MAL) (Metvix®, Galderma- 1g) was applied to the face without occlusion In all protocols, the patients remained indoor for 30 min after procedures and then exposed to daylight in an open environment for 2 hours. After this period, the skin was cleaned with 0.9% saline, and the sunscreen reapplied.
Group II (DL-PDT with microneedles)
EXPERIMENTAL1. Superficial skin curettage all face with a dermatological curette 2. All exposed skin was covered with pure chemical sunscreen 3. After 15 minutes, a uniform layer of methyl-aminolevulinate (MAL) (Metvix®, Galderma- 1g) was applied to the face without occlusion 4. A motorized pen with a tip of 17 grouped needles with 0,5mm (Dermapen Beauty®- Korea) was applied without bleeding In all protocols, the patients remained indoor for 30 min after procedures and then exposed to daylight in an open environment for 2 hours. After this period, the skin was cleaned with 0.9% saline, and the sunscreen reapplied.
Group III (DL-PDT with CO2 laser)
EXPERIMENTAL1. Superficial skin curettage all face with a dermatological curette 2. All exposed skin was covered with pure chemical sunscreen 3. After 15 minutes and removing excess sunscreen, Ablative Fractional Laser (AFXL), CO2 laser, roller-type ferrule, composed of one row with seven fractionating pins (7x1), 60 W, 15 mJ/pixel, 125μm/pixel, 2 mm spacing between ablation zones, density \<1% (Pixel Alma Lasers ®) was applied, single-pass 4. A uniform layer of methyl-aminolevulinate (MAL) (Metvix®, Galderma- 1g) was applied to the face without occlusion In all protocols, the patients remained indoor for 30 min after procedures and then exposed to daylight in an open environment for 2 hours. After this period, the skin was cleaned with 0.9% saline, and the sunscreen reapplied.
Group IV (DL-PDT with microdermabrasion)
EXPERIMENTAL1. Superficial skin curettage all face with a dermatological curette 2. Microdermabrasion with aluminum oxide crystal (Pan Eletronic®) was performed after superficial skin curettage. Three passes on the skin in different directions (vertical, horizontal, and oblique) were applied 3. All exposed skin was covered with pure chemical sunscreen 4. After 15 minutes, a uniform layer of methyl-aminolevulinate (MAL) (Metvix®, Galderma- 1g) was applied to the face without occlusion In all protocols, the patients remained indoor for 30 min after procedures and then exposed to daylight in an open environment for 2 hours. After this period, the skin was cleaned with 0.9% saline, and the sunscreen reapplied.
Interventions
Daylight photodynamic therapy with photosensitizer (MAL - Metvix, Galderma ®)
Daylight photodynamic therapy with photosensitizer (MAL - Metvix, Galderma ®) and Microneedles - motorized pen with a tip of 17 grouped needles with 0,5mm (Dermapen Beauty®- Korea) as a techniques of transepidermal drug delivery (TED)
Daylight photodynamic therapy with photosensitizer (MAL - Metvix, Galderma ®) and Ablative Fractional Laser (AFXL), CO2 laser, roller-type ferrule, composed of one row with seven fractionating pins (7x1), 60 W, 15 mJ/pixel, 125μm/pixel, 2 mm spacing between ablation zones, density \<1% (Pixel Alma Lasers ®) was applied, single-pass
Daylight photodynamic therapy with photosensitizer (MAL - Metvix, Galderma ®) and Microdermabrasion - aluminum oxide crystal (Pan Eletronic®) as a techniques of transepidermal drug delivery (TED)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Both gender;
- Fitzpatrick phototypes I - IV;
- age between 40 and 75 years;
- photodamaged skin with at least 1 lesion of actinic keratosis
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnancy and lactation;
- photosensitivity;
- smoking;
- malignant neoplasms;
- infections;
- immunosuppression;
- collagenoses;
- any systemic disease or emotional/psychological disorder that could contraindicate the procedure.
- any topical treatment or interventions for at least three months before the study started
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital Universitário Antonio Pedro - Universidade Federal Fluminense
Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, 24070-035, Brazil
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Maria Claudia Issa
Professor
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 23, 2019
First Posted
May 28, 2019
Study Start
February 3, 2017
Primary Completion
December 5, 2018
Study Completion
December 1, 2020
Last Updated
January 19, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share