Examining the Effects of Neural Stimulation on Inhibitory Control and Cigarette Smoking
Examining the Effects of Theta Burst Stimulation on Corticothalamic Mediated Inhibitory Control and Smoking Relapse Vulnerability
1 other identifier
interventional
63
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this research study is to examine the effects of theta-burst Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on inhibitory control and smoking among adult cigarette smokers.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 10, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 22, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 26, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 25, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 25, 2021
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 10, 2023
CompletedMarch 10, 2023
March 1, 2023
1.6 years
May 10, 2019
August 5, 2022
March 9, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
The Effects of cTBS vs. iTBS TMS Applied to the r.IFG on Change in Behavioral Inhibition Between Baseline and 1 Hour Post Treatment.
Changes in errors of omission on an inhibitory control task performed prior to and immediately after cTBS, and changes in errors of omission on an inhibitory control task performed prior to and immediately after iTBS. Outcomes will be measured as the mean change in behavioral performance percent correct on inhibition trials between baseline and 1 hour post treatment. Scores on the inhibitory control task range from 0% correct to 100% correct, and the change from pre-post TBS is expressed as a percent increase or decrease in performance. Positive values represent an improved outcome, whereas negative values represent a worse outcome.
1 hour
The Effects of cTBS vs. iTBS TMS Applied to the r.IFG on Changes in Craving to Smoke 1 Hour Post Treatment.
Changes in self-reported craving to smoke will be assessed using the Questionnaire on Smoking Urges brief (QSUb) at 1 hour post session on each of three conditions (Baseline, cTBS, iTBS). The values are calculated as the mean of the scores between conditions at 1 hour post session. Scores on the QSUb range from 10 to 70. The lower the score, the better the outcome.
1 hour
The Effects of cTBS vs. iTBS TMS Applied to the r.IFG on Changes in Craving to Smoke 24hrs Post Treatment Between Conditions.
Changes in self-reported craving to smoke will be assessed using the Questionnaire on Smoking Urges brief (QSUb) at 24hrs post session on each of three conditions (Baseline, cTBS, iTBS). The values are calculated as the mean of the scores between conditions at 24 hours post session. Scores on the QSUb range from 10 to 70. The lower the score, the better the outcome.
24 hours
The Effects of cTBS vs. iTBS TMS Applied to the r.IFG on Changes in Craving to Smoke 48hrs Post Treatment Between Conditions.
Changes in self-reported craving to smoke will be assessed using the Questionnaire on Smoking Urges brief (QSUb) at 48hrs post session on each of three conditions (Baseline, cTBS, iTBS). The values are calculated as the mean of the scores between conditions at 48 hours post session. Scores on the QSUb range from 10 to 70. The lower the score, the better the outcome.
48 hours
The Effects of cTBS vs. iTBS TMS Applied to the r.IFG on Changes in Hyperdirect Brain Circuit Function Between Pre and Post Session.
Changes in inhibitory control task functional connectivity between the r.IFG and nodes within the hyperdirect pathway (r.SMA, r.STN) prior to and immediately after cTBS, and changes in inhibitory control task functional connectivity between the r.IFG and nodes within the hyperdirect pathway (r.SMA, r.STN) prior to and immediately after iTBS. Outcomes will be measured as the transformed correlation (rZ value) of BOLD functional connectivity collected during the inhibitory task. The higher the rZ, the better the outcome.
1 hour
Study Arms (2)
Intermittent Theta-burst stimulation (iTBS)
EXPERIMENTALCross-over design - participants will receive both experimental treatments.
Continuous Theta-burst stimulation (cTBS)
EXPERIMENTALCross-over design - participants will receive both experimental treatments.
Interventions
Theta-burst stimulation (TBS), a form of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), affects brain areas stimulated directly underneath the scalp and brain areas that are functionally connected. Theta-burst stimulation (TBS), a form of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), affects brain areas stimulated directly underneath the scalp and brain areas that are functionally connected.
Theta-burst stimulation (TBS), a form of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), affects brain areas stimulated directly underneath the scalp and brain areas that are functionally connected. Continuous TBS (cTBS) which is thought to temporarily dampen brain activity in that specific area.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Be between the ages of 18 and 65.
- Be in stable mental and physical health.
- Be willing to provide informed consent.
- Be able to comply with protocol requirements and likely to complete all study procedures.
- Be a current nicotine dependent cigarette smoker (smoke ≥10 cigs/day) with a minimum smoking history of smoking an average of ≥ 10 cigs/day over the past two years.
You may not qualify if:
- \. Contraindication to MRI (e.g., presence of metal in the skull, orbits or intracranial cavity, claustrophobia).
- \. Contraindication to TMS (history of neurological disorder or seizure, increased intracranial pressure, brain surgery, or head trauma with loss of consciousness for \> 15 minutes, implanted electronic device, metal in the head, or pregnancy, as indicated by a positive urine pregnancy test at screening).
- \. Any use of substances that lower seizure threshold (such as thyroid medications or cocaine).
- \. History of autoimmune, endocrine, viral, or vascular disorder affecting the brain.
- \. History or MRI evidence of neurological disorder that would lead to local or diffuse brain lesions or significant physical impairment.
- \. Unstable cardiac disease, uncontrolled hypertension, severe renal or liver insufficiency, or sleep apnea.
- \. BAC greater than 0.0. 8. Any other condition or concern that in the Investigator's opinion would impact participant safety, compliance with study instructions, or potentially confound the interpretation of the study results.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Missouri - Columbia
Columbia, Missouri, 65211, United States
Related Publications (2)
Froeliger B, McConnell PA, Bell S, Sweitzer M, Kozink RV, Eichberg C, Hallyburton M, Kaiser N, Gray KM, McClernon FJ. Association Between Baseline Corticothalamic-Mediated Inhibitory Control and Smoking Relapse Vulnerability. JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Apr 1;74(4):379-386. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.0017.
PMID: 28249070BACKGROUNDUpton S, Brown AA, Ithman M, Newman-Norlund R, Sahlem G, Prisciandaro JJ, McClure EA, Froeliger B. Effects of Hyperdirect Pathway Theta Burst Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Inhibitory Control, Craving, and Smoking in Adults With Nicotine Dependence: A Double-Blind, Randomized Crossover Trial. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2023 Nov;8(11):1156-1165. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2023.07.014. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
PMID: 37567363DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Brett Froeliger
- Organization
- University of Missouri
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor Psychiatry
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 10, 2019
First Posted
May 22, 2019
Study Start
September 26, 2019
Primary Completion
April 25, 2021
Study Completion
April 25, 2021
Last Updated
March 10, 2023
Results First Posted
March 10, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share