NCT03956420

Brief Summary

It has been assumed that some elements of the ERAS protocol may contribute to the reduction of complications and improve the satisfaction of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. Elements of the ERAS strategy will be tested in this study. The elements that prove to be feasible and have a positive effect on the treatment process will be introduced into everyday clinical practice. In the next stage of the research, we are planning to investigate whether the introduction of the ERAS strategy has had a long-term positive effect on the quality of life after treatment (a survey 1 month and 6 months after leaving the hospital).

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2019

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 3, 2019

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 14, 2019

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 20, 2019

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2020

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

May 20, 2019

Status Verified

May 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

8 months

First QC Date

May 14, 2019

Last Update Submit

May 17, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery/Grafting, ERAS

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • ERAS bundle compliance in the first 72 hours post-op

    Number of interventions for the ERAS protocol that are delivered to patient (numeric data e.g. 5 out of 10)

    72 hours post operation

  • Shorter Length Of Hospitalization (LOH)

    Total amount of days spent in hospital

    up to 4 weeks after operation

Secondary Outcomes (10)

  • Preoperative anxiety

    on admission to the operating unit

  • Time to extubation

    0 -72 hours

  • Assessment of postoperative pain

    0-24 hours

  • Incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting

    At moment 0, 3, 6, 12 and 24 hours after extubation

  • Time to drink

    0-72 hours

  • +5 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Quality of Recovery

    1 and 6 months after operation

Study Arms (2)

Study group

Implemented ERAS (Early Recovery After Surgery) elements

Behavioral: Premedication visitDietary Supplement: Preoperative periodDrug: Preoperative periodOther: Postoperative periodOther: Intraoperative periodDrug: Intraoperative period

Control group

The control group will consist of patients treated during the study in accordance with the current standards used in the Department

Interventions

detailed information about surgery, anaesthesia and postoperative period

Study group
Preoperative periodDIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

avoidance of prolonged fasting, intake of fluids with carbohydrates before surgery

Study group

Fluids 1 ml/kg/h; Discontinuation of propofol at the moment of drainage and cardiovascular system stabilization; Fluids administered orally 2 hours after extubation; Early mobilisation

Study group

deep temperature (necessity to maintain normothermia during the stay in the operating theatre 36 °C. Normothermia should be maintained rather than restored.

Also known as: Normothermia
Study group

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients who meet the inclusion criteria will be eligible for the study. The perioperative period and anaesthesia will be supervised by anaesthesiologists trained to carry out the study. The study group will include 50 patients. The results obtained in the study group will be compared with the results of the control group. The control group will consist of patients treated during the study in accordance with the current standards used in the Department.

You may qualify if:

  • CABG/OPCAB (Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery/Off Pump Coronary Bypass Surgery).
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction above 35% (EF ≥ 35%).
  • The operation was performed in a planned mode.

You may not qualify if:

  • Haematological diseases and the associated increased risk of bleeding in the early postoperative period. Patients taking anticoagulants until the day of surgery with the exception of aspirin.
  • Neurological disorders, stroke with persistent symptoms, dementia.
  • Chronic lung disease with hypoxia and the need for regular medication.
  • Inability to move independently, disability preventing efficient rehabilitation, prolonged use of painkillers.
  • Emergency surgery, reoperation.
  • Return to the operating room regardless of the reason (resternotomy).
  • Perioperative infarction with circulatory destabilization.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Upper-Silesian Medical Centre of the Silesian Medical University

Katowice, Polska, 40-635, Poland

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery DiseaseCoronary Stenosis

Interventions

Preoperative PeriodPostoperative PeriodIntraoperative Period

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Coronary DiseaseMyocardial IschemiaHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesArteriosclerosisArterial Occlusive DiseasesVascular Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Perioperative PeriodSurgical Procedures, OperativePatient CareHealth ServicesHealth Care Facilities Workforce and Services

Study Officials

  • Ewa Kucewicz-Czech

    Upper-Silesian Medical Centre; DEPARTMENT OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY AND INTENSIVE CARE WITH CARDIAC MONITORING

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE CONTROL
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Clinical Professor, Head of Unit

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 14, 2019

First Posted

May 20, 2019

Study Start

May 3, 2019

Primary Completion

January 1, 2020

Study Completion

May 1, 2021

Last Updated

May 20, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations