Development and Evaluation of a Patient-centered Transition Program for Stroke Patients, Combining Case Management and Access to an Internet Information Platform
NAVISTROKE
1 other identifier
interventional
200
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Due to the brutality of stroke and increasingly shorter lengths of hospital stay, patients and their families must adapt quickly to the patient's new state of health and the new role of caregiver for family members. Patients and caregivers report a significant need for advice and information during this transition period. Thus, the provision of information through an Internet platform could meet these characteristics, in association with individualised support by a case-manager to ensure continuity of care and improve care pathway. The investigating team's hypothesis is that, through comprehensive, individualized and flexible support for patients and their caregivers, a patient-centred post-stroke hospital/home transition program, combining an Internet platform and telephone follow-up by a case-manager, could improve patients' level of participation and quality of life.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable stroke
Started Dec 2021
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable stroke
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 15, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 20, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 30, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 31, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2022
CompletedSeptember 17, 2021
September 1, 2021
3 months
May 15, 2019
September 10, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Participation at 6 months after hospital discharge
Patient participation score, measured by the score obtained in the "participation" dimension of the stroke-specific quality of life scale: Stroke Impact Scale 6 months after discharge from hospital
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (32)
Participation at 12 months
12 months
Quality of life at 6 months after hospital discharge: Stroke Impact Scale (SIS)
6 months
Quality of life at 12 months after hospital discharge: Stroke Impact Scale (SIS)
12 months
Anxiety and depression scores at 6 months after hospital discharge
6 months
Anxiety and depression scores at 12 months after hospital discharge
12 months
- +27 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Intervention group
EXPERIMENTALFor 12 months from the return home, patients in the intervention group will benefit from telephone support by a trained case-manager (number and frequency of contacts defined according to the patient's needs) and access to an Internet platform. The intervention aims to improve the patient's ability to manage his or her situation and meet his or her needs upon return home, including identifying and requesting the necessary health or social resources.
Control group
NO INTERVENTIONPatients randomized to the control group will receive the usual practices. As part of the study, they will be contacted for data collection upon their return home, at 6 months and 12 months by a clinical research associate. Access to the internet platform and an interview with the case-manager will be offered at the end of the study to patients in the control group.
Interventions
4 participatory co-design workshops lasting 4 hours each that will follow a "user-centered design" approach: identification of end-user needs, prototyping/development of the intervention (case-management procedures and platform), iterative improvement, end-user testing. Based on the cognitive social theory underpinning the intervention, scientific literature, an overview of existing organizations and the results of the Stroke 69 and Arthur Tybra studies (patient needs following the acute phase), the advisory committee will: * Define the case-manager's profile, and required knowledge and skills * Identify the resources and tools to be proposed on the Internet platform * Test the tools and content * Refine the program evaluation criteria * Test and validate the study procedures.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patient,
- Having had a first confirmed, ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke
- Managed in the participating stroke center
- Whose return home directly from the stroke center is planned
- Presenting a modified Rankin score of 1 to 3 when deciding to leave the stroke center
- Having given its written consent
- Whose main residence is located in the Rhône department of France
- Aphasic patients may be included if a caregiver can follow up with the case manager
You may not qualify if:
- Patient residing in an institution prior to stroke
- Supported in the gerontological field before stroke
- Inability to communicate by telephone with the case-manager and absence of a caregiver to follow up by telephone with the case-manager
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (1)
Termoz A, Delvallee M, Damiolini E, Marchal M, Preau M, Huchon L, Mazza S, Habchi O, Bravant E, Derex L, Nighoghossian N, Cakmak S, Rabilloud M, Denis A, Schott AM, Haesebaert J. Co-design and evaluation of a patient-centred transition programme for stroke patients, combining case management and access to an internet information platform: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial - NAVISTROKE. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Apr 22;22(1):537. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07907-5.
PMID: 35459183DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Julie Haesebaert, Dr
Hospices Civils de Lyon
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 15, 2019
First Posted
May 20, 2019
Study Start
December 30, 2021
Primary Completion
March 31, 2022
Study Completion
September 30, 2022
Last Updated
September 17, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
- Time Frame
- beginning 3 months and ending 5 years following publication
- Access Criteria
- julie.haesebaert01@chu-lyon.fr
Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after deidentification (text, tables, figures and appendices) may be shared with researchers whose proposed use of the data has been approved by an independent review committee identified for this purpose.