Insight Enhancement Program vs. Metacognitive Training for Psychosis in Patients With Schizophrenia: A Three-Armed Comparative Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
99
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to explore new safe effective psychotherapeutic interventions for schizophrenia through assessing the efficacy and acceptability of complementary "Insight Enhancement Program" (IEP) and "Metacognitive Training for Psychosis" (MCT), in relation to each other, and in relation to "Treatment As Usual" (TAU). It is hypothesized that at the end of therapy, compared to "Treatment As Usual", patients undergoing whether (IEP) or (MCT) will display a significant reduction in psychopathology particularly positive symptoms and delusional ideation, and a significant improvement in Insight and metacognitive capacity. Additionally, it is hypothesized that the acceptance of (IEP) and (MCT) will be higher than acceptance of (TAU). This study also aims to examine whether metacognition is associated with insight even after controlling for the effects of psychiatric symptomatology.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started May 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 16, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 20, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 30, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 30, 2021
CompletedAugust 6, 2021
August 1, 2021
1.8 years
May 16, 2019
August 4, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Mean Change in Psychopathology as measured by The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS)
The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) is a 30-item, seven-point (1-7) scale and it is the most widely used instrument for the assessment of schizophrenia symptoms in clinical trials. Ratings follow semi-structured interviews and clear standard operating procedures. Symptoms are rated according to their presence in the past 2 weeks. The PANSS was used many times before in trials of MCT \& insight in schizophrenia, which makes it more suitable allowing comparison of results.
Pre-Intervention at Week 4, and Post-Intervention at Week 8
Mean Change in Psychopathology as measured by The Psychotic Symptom Rating Scale (PSYRATS)
The PSYRATS is a 17-item multidimensional measure of more qualitative aspects of hallucinations and delusions. Symptoms are rated over the past 2 weeks. Two subscales exist; for auditory hallucinations (11 items), and for delusions (6 items).
Pre-Intervention at Week 4, and Post-Intervention at Week 8
Mean Change in Insight Scores as measured by The Scale to Assess Unawareness of Mental Disorder (SUMD)
The SUMD evaluates insight into various dimensions of the disease. The SUMD is a standardized scale that relies on a direct interview with the patient.
Pre-Intervention at Week 4, and Post-Intervention at Week 8
Mean Change in Insight Scores as measured by The Beck Cognitive Insight Scale (BCIS)
The BCIS is a self-report consisting of 15 statements rated on a 4-point Likert scale. It is divided into 2 subscales; self-reflectiveness, and self-certainty. Self-reflectiveness consists of 9 items measuring objectivity, reflectiveness and openness to feedback. Self-certainty consists of 6 items measuring decision-making and resistance to feedback. Overall cognitive insight was defined by Beck and associates as the difference between self-reflectiveness and self- certainty and labeled composite index.
Pre-Intervention at Week 4, and Post-Intervention at Week 8
Mean Change in Metacognition Scores as measured by The Metacognition Assessment Scale - Adapted version (MAS-A)
The MAS-A is scored on the basis of the transcript of the Indiana Psychiatric Illness Interview (IPII). Scoring is performed by a consensus group of at least three trained raters. The four domains of metacognition are reflected in the four ordinal complexity scales of the MAS-A: self-reflectivity, understanding the other's mind, decentration, and mastery. The raters assign one point for each function on each scale that they judge is accomplished in the transcript.
Pre-Intervention at Week 4, and Post-Intervention at Week 8
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Mean Change in Scores as measured by The Personal and social performance scale (PSP)
Pre-Intervention at Week 4, and Post-Intervention at Week 8
Mean Change in Neuropsychological Functioning Scores as measured by The Trail making test (TMT)
Pre-Intervention at Week 4, and Post-Intervention at Week 8
Mean Change in Neuropsychological Functioning Scores as measured by The Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST)
Pre-Intervention at Week 4, and Post-Intervention at Week 8
Mean Change in Neuropsychological Functioning Scores as measured by The story subtest of the Rivermead Behavioural Memory Task.
Pre-Intervention at Week 4, and Post-Intervention at Week 8
Mean Change in Neuropsychological Functioning Scores as measured by The Porteus Mazes task.
Pre-Intervention at Week 4, and Post-Intervention at Week 8
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (1)
Subjective Acceptance of the Interventions as measured by an Acceptance Questionnaire
At Week 8
Study Arms (3)
Insight Enhancement Program (IEP)
EXPERIMENTALThe insight enhancement program is a dynamo-cognitive therapeutic modality with the main target of improving insight in psychotic patients as a means of improving their overall outcome.
Metacognitive Training for Psychosis (MCT)
EXPERIMENTALThe metacognitive training program, developed by Moritz et al. (Moritz \& Woodward, 2007) targets cognitive biases putatively involved in the formation and maintenance of psychotic symptoms.
Treatment As Usual (TAU)
ACTIVE COMPARATORTreatment as usual will be used as a control condition to assure ethicality of our procedure. Medications: In order to standardize treatment, Risperidone (Risperdal ) will be used as the antipsychotic medication in all three groups with a dose up to 6-8 milligrams according to clinical severity. The same dose will be used for 1 month prior to starting interventions). In case of occurrence of mild extrapyramidal symptoms associated with high doses of risperidone, an anticholinergic drug (Benztropine) might be used.
Interventions
IEP is comprised of 8 sessions, administered twice weekly, across a one month period. The session duration is 60-90 minutes. IEP will be administered in a group format with 8-12 patients in each group. During sessions, different topics representing 8 different stages of illness are discussed according to a chronological schedule. These stages are presented on an Illness March Graph (IMG) and include: Stage I: Personality formation, Stage II: Pre onset confusion, Stage III: Prodroma, Stage IV: The illness, Stage V: Resistance, Stage VI: Remission, Stage VII: Maintenance, Stage VIII: Relapse. Patients actively participate through the exchange of their own experiences and interpretations, which are then reinterpreted by the therapist and by the patients themselves.
The training consists of eight modules that are administered within the framework of a group intervention program that involves eight 1-hour group sessions with 4 to 10 patients in each group. MCT is manualized and currently available in thirty languages and can been downloaded via the following web address: http://www.uke.de/mct. Among the problematic thinking styles recognized as potential contributors to the development of delusions are attributional distortions (module 1), a jumping to conclusions bias (module 2 and 7), a bias against disconfirmatory evidence (module 3), deficits in theory of mind (module 4 and 6), over-confidence in memory errors (module 5) and depressive cognitive patterns (module 8).
Treatment As Usual (TAU) consists of psychiatric management by a clinical team including at least one psychiatrist and one psychologist. Treatment involves antipsychotic medication, regular office-based contacts with the clinical team for treatment monitoring, recreational group activities, and unstructured psycho-educational groups. Participants in the interventional groups also will receive TAU. Medications: In order to standardize treatment, Risperidone (Risperdal ) will be used as the antipsychotic medication in all three groups with a dose up to 6-8 milligrams according to clinical severity. The same dose will be used for 1 month prior to starting interventions). In case of occurrence of mild extrapyramidal symptoms associated with high doses of risperidone, an anticholinergic drug (Benztropine) might be used.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- A diagnosis of a Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM5).
- A present or prior episode of delusional symptoms, as assessed via clinical interview.
- Within the first five years since the onset of psychosis.
- Age between 18 and 65 years.
- Egyptian Nationality.
- Fluent command of the Arabic language.
- Capacity to understand the study description and provide informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Comorbid Substance Dependence Disorder.
- Comorbid medical conditions, whose pathology or treatment could alter the presentation or treatment of schizophrenia.
- Intellectual disability (IQ of less than 70).
- Known sensitivity to Risperidone.
- Pregnant or Breast feeding women.
- Scores of 5 or higher on the PANSS hostility item and of 6 or higher on PANSS suspiciousness item (As group settings can be disrupted by behavioral disturbances, patients with very severe forms of delusions, formal thought disorder and hostility should refrain from participating in MCT or IEP until some remission has taken place).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Agiad Psychiatry Hospitallead
- University of Pittsburghcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Agiad Psychiatry Hospital
Ţalkhā, Dakahliya, 35716, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ahmed A. Dobie, Msc.
Agiad Psychiatry Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mai M. El-Bassosy, Msc.
Agiad Psychiatry Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Assessors will be blind to treatment allocation, and specific measures will be undertaken to preserve blinding and prevent a Rosenthal effect (e.g., assessors will not be employees of the same hospital, and before each assessment participants will be explicitly instructed not to disclose their group assignment to the assessor). Randomization will be according to a randomization plan using stratified permuted block randomization with each block containing four participants. This method will be used to achieve balance among groups in terms of subjects' baseline characteristics. Stratified randomization is achieved by generating a separate block for each covariate such as age \& gender.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Specialist of Psychiatry
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 16, 2019
First Posted
May 20, 2019
Study Start
May 1, 2019
Primary Completion
January 30, 2021
Study Completion
January 30, 2021
Last Updated
August 6, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- SAP, CSR
- Time Frame
- 6 months after publishing
- Access Criteria
- Other Researchers
A plan is still being put together