Study Stopped
Study is not human subjects research.
Understanding the Impact of Drug Shortages on Oncology Care Delivery
4 other identifiers
observational
N/A
1 country
6
Brief Summary
This trial studies the impact of drug shortages on oncology care delivery. Gathering information about cancer drug shortages over time may help researchers improve access to drugs during times of shortages.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Jul 2018
Longer than P75 for all trials
6 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 15, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 16, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 18, 2025
CompletedApril 4, 2025
April 1, 2024
6.9 years
May 15, 2019
April 2, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Proportion of NCORP community practices that experience a cancer care delivery problem attributable to a drug shortage of infusional therapeutic oncology drugs
Each incident is defined by the drug in shortage and by each cancer care delivery decision (e.g., whenever a recommended treatment plan is developed). All incidents are collected de-identified and aggregated to the practice site. For each drug in shortage during the year (4 quarters) of observation, will determine the number of practices reporting a care delivery problem due to each drug during any quarter and total number of practices treating patients with the drug during any quarter. Will calculate the proportion of affected practices among practices treating patients with the drug as the ratio of these two numbers. Will calculate mean, median, range and evaluate the shape of the distribution of drug specific estimates.
Baseline up to 12 months
Change to less effective treatment
Assessed with the Drug Shortage Incident Report. When the primary oncology team is developing a recommended treatment plan and the preferred drug is in shortage, even if the patient never was treated with the drug in shortage, this is considered a "change" for this study. The determination of "less effective" will be made by the primary oncology team. "Less effective" treatments can include those that are not the best options per guidelines through the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, the American Society of Clinical Oncology, and other organizations that establish guidelines for oncology care. Given that the primary oncology team is in charge of the patient's care, they will determine if they think the "change" is "less effective" based on their understanding of the patient's diagnosis and clinical situation.
Up to 12 months
Change to more toxic treatment
Assessed with the Drug Shortage Incident Report. When the primary oncology team is developing a recommended treatment plan and the preferred drug is in shortage, even if the patient never was treated with the drug in shortage, this is considered a "change" for this study. The practice site staff will verify with the primary oncology team that they perceive this cancer care delivery issue (e.g., change to another drug) to be more toxic than what was intended. Whether the "change" led to a more toxic treatment or regimen will be determined by the primary oncology team. Teams can utilize their pharmacy staff to help determine if the new treatment or regimen has data to support that it would lead to higher toxicity.
Up to 12 months
Delay in treatment
Assessed with the Drug Shortage Incident Report. Each incident is defined by the drug in shortage and by each cancer care delivery decision (e.g., whenever a recommended treatment plan is developed). Any time there is a change to a treatment regimen due to a drug shortage, the primary oncology team should determine whether or not they perceive this change to be a problem for a patient. When there is a drug shortage that results in a potential issue (e.g., missed dose), the practice site staff will verify with the primary oncology team that they actually perceived this cancer care delivery issue as a problem. The same patient may experience multiple cancer care delivery problems over the course of their treatment. Each of these problems should be reported, de-identified, as separate incidents as they occur.
Up to 12 months
Medication error/near miss
Assessed with the Drug Shortage Incident Report. When there is a shortage of oncology drugs and there is a change in dose, administration, or drug, there can be medication errors in dose or concentration (e.g., drug was supposed to be diluted, but is not). A near miss is when the primary oncology team identifies a potential medication error but the drug was not administered to the patient. Oncology teams should rely on pharmacy staff to help identify and define medication errors and near misses.
Up to 12 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Rate of cancer care delivery problems (CCDPs)
Up to 12 months
Strategies practices use
Baseline up to 12 months
Other Outcomes (5)
Practice factors
Baseline up to 12 months
Variation in practice characteristics
Baseline up to
Effects of drug shortages on clinical trials
Up to 12 months
- +2 more other outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Health Services Research (surveys about drug shortages)
At baseline, practice sites complete a Baseline Drug Shortage Survey and Pharmacy Baseline Survey; Drug Shortage Incident Reports are completed in real time as cancer care delivery problems occur; and the Quarterly Follow-Up Survey Number Treated Report every 3 months for one year (4 total).
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Be a primary affiliate or sub-affiliate of an NCORP community site or minority underserved (M/U) community site that is affiliated with the University of Rochester Cancer Center (URCC) NCORP Research Base
You may qualify if:
- Be a primary affiliate or sub-affiliate of an NCORP community site or minority underserved (M/U) community site that is affiliated with the University of Rochester Cancer Center (URCC) NCORP Research Base
- Practice sites must have a valid Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (CTEP) identification number
- Practice sites may or may not share a pharmacy
- Provide infusional chemotherapy treatment (either inpatient or outpatient)
You may not qualify if:
- Practices sites without valid CTEP identification (ID)
- Practice sites that do not provide infusional chemotherapy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (6)
Hennepin County Medical Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55415, United States
Health Partners Inc
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55454, United States
North Memorial Medical Health Center
Robbinsdale, Minnesota, 55422, United States
Regions Hospital
Saint Paul, Minnesota, 55101, United States
Southeast Clinical Oncology Research Program
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27104, United States
Spartanburg Medical Center
Spartanburg, South Carolina, 29303, United States
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Elaine Hill, PhD
University of Rochester NCORP Research Base
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 15, 2019
First Posted
May 16, 2019
Study Start
July 1, 2018
Primary Completion
June 1, 2025
Study Completion
June 18, 2025
Last Updated
April 4, 2025
Record last verified: 2024-04