Scaling up an Evidence-based Intervention for Antiretroviral Therapy for PWID in Vietnam: an Implementation Trial
SNaPR01
Scaling up HIV Prevention Trials Network (HPTN) 074: a Cluster Randomized Implementation Trial of an Evidence-based Intervention for Antiretroviral Therapy for PWID in Vietnam
3 other identifiers
interventional
1,000
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare two implementation approaches \[Standard Approach (SA) vs. Tailored Approach (TA)\] for scaling-up the evidence-based systems navigation and psychosocial counseling integrated intervention (SNaP) in HIV test sites in Vietnam.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable hiv-infections
Started Jun 2020
Longer than P75 for not_applicable hiv-infections
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 14, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 16, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 10, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 31, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 31, 2024
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 23, 2024
CompletedMay 11, 2025
July 1, 2024
3.1 years
May 14, 2019
May 30, 2024
April 23, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Fidelity to SNaP Intervention Procedures
Fidelity measures whether the SNaP intervention was delivered as intended. Fidelity score = (% Systems navigation sessions completed x Average navigation session quality score) + (% Counseling sessions completed x Average counseling session quality score) Session completion will be assessed by reviewing the navigator and counselor logs, while session quality will be assessed by central implementation team review and scoring of a random 10% of all forms (navigation) and audio-recordings (psychosocial counseling). Test site fidelity score range: 0-200 (Higher score indicates higher fidelity.)
Measured over 26 months after SNaP implementation in a clinic
Percent of PWID Who Initiated ART
Percent of PWID who initiated antiretroviral therapy (ART) among the PWID who initiated SNaP, measured through ART clinic records of consenting PWID and/or self-report. This measures ART uptake among PWID who initiated the SNaP intervention.
Medical record reviews conducted within 6 months after enrollment; self-report: 6-12 months after enrollment among those who initiated SNaP
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Percent of PWID Who Were Contacted and Participated in SNaP
Up to 24 months after implementation of SNaP in a clinic
Mean Acceptability Score of SNaP by PWID (AIM)
Up to 24 months after SNap implementation in a clinic
Mean Acceptability Score of SNaP by Test Site Staff (OADRI)
24 months after implementation of SNaP in a clinic
Percent of PWID Who Are Virally Suppressed
Up to 24 months after implementation of SNaP in a clinic
Percent of PWID on Medication-Assisted Treatment (MAT)
Up to 24 months after SNaP implementation in a clinic
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Standard Approach (SA)
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe Standard Approach is a one-size-fits-all multifaceted implementation strategy that was systematically developed using Intervention Mapping.
Tailored Approach (TA)
EXPERIMENTALThe Tailored Approach includes an implementation strategy that will be tailored to match site-specific barriers to implementation of SNaP at that site.
Interventions
The multifaceted implementation strategies for SA sites were identified through centralized Intervention Mapping. Before SNaP implementation starts, the specific set of one-size-fits-all implementation strategies was determined through a formal process with investigators, government stakeholders, and clinical representatives.
The Tailored Approach includes the multifaceted strategy that will be offered to the Standard Approach condition. It will also be tailored to match site-specific barriers to implementation of SNaP at that site. The strategy for TA sites involves a 2-day site-specific training, monthly coaching calls, and an external technical assistance hotline to help organizations to tailor implementation strategies to address their site-specific needs. At the 2-day TA training, the TA sites will be guided on developing site-specific implementation plans, in which they may use additional implementation strategies that they have identified themselves or selected from a list developed by the central team.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- PWID participants:
- HIV infection:
- Newly diagnosed HIV infection, based on confirmatory test, and not currently on ART at the time of study enrollment; or
- If previously diagnosed with HIV infection, then must not currently be on ART at the time of study enrollment (self-reported)
- Age 18 years or older
- Injection drug use within the past 6 months (self-reported at time of screening)
- Willing to provide informed consent for the study
- Test site director boards and staff:
- All test site director boards and staff, including the navigators and counselors, at the selected HIV test sites
- Willing to provide informed consent for the study
You may not qualify if:
- PWID participants:
- Residence outside of the catchment area of local antiretroviral therapy (ART) and medication-assisted treatment (MAT, e.g. methadone) clinics
- Currently on ART at time of study enrollment (self-reported)
- Planning to move out of the catchment area within the next 24 months.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of North Carolina, Chapel Hilllead
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)collaborator
- Ohio State Universitycollaborator
- Johns Hopkins Universitycollaborator
- Hanoi Medical Universitycollaborator
- Vietnam Administration for HIV/AIDS Controlcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Hanoi Medical University
Hanoi, Vietnam
Related Publications (3)
Go VF, Giang LM, Phan HTT, Chen JS, Powell BJ, Bartels SM, Nguyen MXB, Sripaipan T, Nong HTT, Dang LTH, Pham MD, Vo SH, Tran HV, Hoang VTH, Nguyen NTK, Chu AV, Levintow SN, Dowdy DW, Sohn H, Pence BW, Miller WC. Scaling an intervention for the engagement of people with HIV who inject drugs into care in Viet Nam: an implementation-effectiveness, cluster-randomised trial. Lancet Glob Health. 2025 Dec;13(12):e2111-e2121. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(25)00331-6.
PMID: 41240949DERIVEDNguyen MX, Bartels SM, Akiba CF, Sripaipan T, Nong HT, Dang LT, Tran HV, Hoang VT, Le GM, Go VF, Miller WC, Powell BJ. Tracking modifications to implementation strategies: a case study from SNaP - a hybrid type III randomized controlled trial to scale up integrated systems navigation and psychosocial counseling for PWID with HIV in Vietnam. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Oct 26;24(1):249. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02367-3.
PMID: 39462341DERIVEDNguyen MXB, Chu AV, Powell BJ, Tran HV, Nguyen LH, Dao ATM, Pham MD, Vo SH, Bui NH, Dowdy DW, Latkin CA, Lancaster KE, Pence BW, Sripaipan T, Hoffman I, Miller WC, Go VF. Comparing a standard and tailored approach to scaling up an evidence-based intervention for antiretroviral therapy for people who inject drugs in Vietnam: study protocol for a cluster randomized hybrid type III trial. Implement Sci. 2020 Aug 8;15(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-01020-z.
PMID: 32771017DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Jane Chen, PhD
- Organization
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Vivian F Go, PhD, MPH, MA
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
William C Miller, MD, PhD, MPH
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 14, 2019
First Posted
May 16, 2019
Study Start
June 10, 2020
Primary Completion
July 31, 2023
Study Completion
May 31, 2024
Last Updated
May 11, 2025
Results First Posted
July 23, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, ICF
- Time Frame
- Data will be available 6 months to 5 years after publication of the primary outcomes paper.
- Access Criteria
- Other researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal to study investigators may be provided access to de-identified data from the study. The other researchers must execute a Data Use Sharing Agreement with the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC) and obtain the applicable regulatory approvals from their institution before it is permissible for study investigators to share data with the other researchers.
Individual participant data that underlie the results of an article, after de-identification.