NCT03945331

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare transcutaneous electrical spinal stimulation (TESS) and epidural electrical stimulation (EES); in particular, the motor activity enabled by each method and the potential health benefits of each method.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
2

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2019

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 22, 2019

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 28, 2019

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 10, 2019

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 17, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 17, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

October 19, 2020

Status Verified

October 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

1.4 years

First QC Date

April 28, 2019

Last Update Submit

October 15, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (8)

  • Kinematics

    Change in measurements of joint angles using video-based, inertial measurement, and/or electromagnetic markers.

    Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, End of Month 7, Month 10, Month 13

  • Electromyography

    Change in measurements of electrical activity at major muscle groups below the level of injury.

    Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, End of Month 7, Month 10, Month 13

  • Foot pressure

    Change in measurements of foot pressure through shoe-insole pressure sensors.

    Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, End of Month 7, Month 10, Month 13

  • Somatosensory evoked potentials

    Change in measurements of change in conduction in the peripheral nerves, cervical and lumbosacral spinal cord, deep brain structures, and sensory cortex, through surface electrodes.

    Baseline, Month 6, End of Month 7, Month 13

  • Transcranial magnetic stimulation motor evoked potentials

    Change in measurements of stimulus intensity required to elicit muscle responses in muscle groups known to elicit optimal motor evoked potential responses, both above and below the level of injury.

    Baseline, Month 6, End of Month 7, Month 13

  • Monosynaptic spinal reflex testing

    Change in measurements of stimulation intensity H and F wave thresholds and maximal responses through surface electrodes.

    Baseline, Month 6, End of Month 7, Month 13

  • Trunk stability

    Change in measurements of trunk stability using the modified functional reach test (mFRT).

    Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, End of Month 7, Month 10, Month 13

  • Injury severity: American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS)

    Change in measurements of impairment of sensory and motor functions using the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS). Individuals are classified from A" (complete spinal cord injury) to "E" (normal function). 28 dermatomes and 10 key muscles are assessed bilaterally. Results are summed to produce overall sensory and motor scores and are used in combination with evaluation of anal sensory and motor function as a basis for the determination of AIS classification. Sensory scores are rated 0 (sensation absent) to 2 (normal), bilaterally for each of 28 dermatomes. Muscle function is rated 0 (total paralysis) to 5 (active movement, full range of motion against significant resistance) for each myotome. Upper Extremity Motor Subscores and Lower Extremity Motor Subscores are each scored from 0 to 50; the ASIA Motor Score is scored from 0 to 100. The presence of anal sensation and voluntary anal contraction are assessed as a yes/no.

    Baseline, Month 6, End of Month 7, Month 13

Secondary Outcomes (31)

  • Bowel function

    Baseline, Month 6, Month 13

  • Bladder function

    Baseline, Month 6, Month 13

  • Spasticity

    Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, End of Month 7, Month 10, Month 13

  • Bone mineral density

    Baseline, Month 6, Month 13

  • Body composition - body fat mass

    Baseline, Month 6, End of Month 7, Month 13

  • +26 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (11)

  • Volitional movement (1)

    1 year

  • Volitional movement (2)

    1 year

  • Volitional movement (3)

    1 year

  • +8 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

TESS

EXPERIMENTAL

Transcutaneous Electrical Spinal Stimulation (TESS), used during all training sessions.

Device: Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulator

EES

EXPERIMENTAL

TESS, used during the initial 6-month training period, followed by Epidural Electrical Stimulation (EES) during the final 6-month training period.

Device: Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulatorDevice: Epidural spinal cord stimulation system

Interventions

DS8R Electrical Stimulator For Human Research

EESTESS

Spectra WaveWriter Epidural Spinal Cord Stimulator System with CoverEdge 32 Electrode Surgical Lead

EES

Eligibility Criteria

Age22 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Spinal cord injury due to trauma located between the seventh cervical and tenth thoracic vertebrae
  • American Spinal Injury Association grading scale of A or B (at least 4 each of A and B) below the level of SCI
  • Intact spinal reflexes below the level of SCI
  • At least 1-year post-SCI
  • At least 22 years of age
  • Willing to use medically acceptable methods of contraception, if female and of child-bearing potential

You may not qualify if:

  • Currently a prison inmate, or awaiting trial, related to criminal activity
  • Pregnancy at the time of enrollment
  • DEXA t score \<-3.5 at spine and femur head
  • History of chronic and/or treatment resistant urinary tract infection
  • Unhealed decubitus ulcer
  • Unhealed skeletal fracture
  • Untreated clinical diagnosis of depression
  • Presence of joint contractures or an Ashworth spasticity score of 4
  • Active anti-spasticity medication regimen within 3 months prior to study enrollment
  • Presence of transcranial magnetic stimulation-evoked potentials in leg muscles
  • Non MRI-compatible implanted medical devices.
  • Undergoing, or planning to undergo, diathermy treatment
  • Active participation in another interventional clinical trial
  • Presence of conditions or disorders which require MRI monitoring
  • For EES cohort subjects, a history of coagulopathy or other significant cardiac or medical risk factors for surgery
  • +7 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Mayo Clinic

Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States

Location

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Paraplegia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ParalysisNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Kristin D. Zhao, Ph.D.

    Mayo Clinic

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DEVICE FEASIBILITY
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 28, 2019

First Posted

May 10, 2019

Study Start

January 22, 2019

Primary Completion

June 17, 2020

Study Completion

June 17, 2020

Last Updated

October 19, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations