Intrathecal Ziconotide Antalgic Efficacy for Severe Refractory Neuropathic
SPIDOL
Assessment of Intrathecal Ziconotide Antalgic Efficacy for Severe Refractory Neuropathic Pain Due to Spinal Cord Lesions.
1 other identifier
interventional
44
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Spinal cord injury (SCI) has an average prevalence of 50 per 100.000 in general population (30.000 patients with SCI in France) with estimates of the overall prevalence for severe neuropathic pain ranges from 30 to 51% (up to 10.000 patients in France). Patients with such spinal lesions may develop neuropathic pain called sublesional pain as perceived in an area below the level of injury. A second type of pain is at level of injury, i.e. perceived in a segmental pattern within the dermatome corresponding the spinal cord and nerve roots. These two types of pain are very harmful and are notoriously difficult to treat probably because of complex pathogenic mechanisms due to abnormal functioning of deafferented spinal and supraspinal nociceptive neurons. Opioids, whatever be the route of administration, had demonstrated their inefficacy for these patients as well as several surgical techniques. So, chronic pain in relation with spinal lesion can be defined as real refractory pain. Synaptic release of neurotransmitters is dependent on calcium intake trough voltage dependent channels. Type 2.1 or N-Type channels are specific for nociceptive system and can be blocked by a peptic neurotoxin: Ziconotide. Blocking these specific calcium channels neuromodulates nociception. Intrathecal use of Ziconotide, bringing the active molecule close to its receptors, has a proven clinical impact for a wide variety of pain (4). The intrathecal Ziconotide (ITZ) infusion using an implanted pump is validated for treatment of pain refractory to systemic analgesics (HAS, avis du 14-27 mai 2008). Meanwhile, no data are available in literature on positive effects of ITZ on specific spinal neuropathic pain. A pilot study was performed by the coordinator team using ITZ on 12 patients with spinal pain: 8 patients had \> 40% decrease of pain on numeric scale, 6 patients beneficiated from implanted pump allowing chronic ITZ treatment inducing 60% numeric scale decrease in average with 1 year follow-up. Therefore intrathecal Ziconotide could be an excellent candidate for the treatment of spinal pain where the pain generators may be difficult to target by other available treatments. This study is the first to assess ITZ (as IT antalgic monotherapy) versus placebo with a randomized controlled study with long follow-up. Trials have already been performed but not specially targeted spinal pain, and did not exceed three weeks follow-up. Long term effects of Ziconotide on memory, cognition and mood have not been evaluated. In fact even though short term adverse effects on higher level functions have been described they have not been assessed in a placebo controlled situation. Moreover, treating (successfully or not) patients with spinal pain could bring valuable insights both into the mechanisms of pain production in SCI patients and in the mechanisms of Ziconotide action: a positive result on pain below the injury level would imply action on the second or third order synapses of the nociceptive pathways. Similarly an effect at the level of pain, in absence of an effect below the level pain would argue discussion against such action. The impact of ITZ on the different clinical components of pain experienced by the patients, could also give some data on neuromodulation mechanism induced by the therapy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Jun 2019
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 18, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 8, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 20, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 20, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 20, 2021
CompletedMay 8, 2019
May 1, 2019
6 months
May 18, 2018
May 7, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in pain between both treatment arms assessed by the Visual Analogic Scale (VAS)
The primary endpoint is the comparison, for each patient, of the mean pain intensity, within the last two week before the end of treatment, between two conditions: under Intrathecal Ziconotide (ITZ) and intrathecal (IT) placebo, using a visual analogic scale (VAS). This VAS is a graduated line from 0 to 10, 0 being the lowest level of pain and 10 being the highest level of pain.The final endpoint will be measured after 6 months of treatment and 6 months of placebo (or vice versa according to the random assignation of first treatment in this cross over design study), that is to say after a total of 12 months of treatment.
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (38)
Evaluation of Long term analgesic effect of intrathecal Ziconotide assessed by the Visual Analogic Scale (VAS)
12 months
Evaluation of Analgesic effect of at least 30%
12 months
Evaluation of Severe Adverse Events (SAE)
over the 12 months
Evaluation of patient satisfaction with pain treatment at first visit to refill the pump (1 month) assessed by the Visual Analogic Scale (VAS)
1 month
Evaluation patient satisfaction of pain relief with the treatment at 6 months assessed by the Visual Analogic Scale (VAS)
6 months
- +33 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
intrathecal Ziconotide followed by placebo
EXPERIMENTALEach of the 44 patients will receive alternatively treatment or placebo, for 6 months. The treatment for each period will be randomly assigned. A washout period of 15 days will be applied between the two periods of infusion.
intrathecal Ziconotide preceded by placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATOREach of the 44 patients will receive alternatively treatment or placebo, for 6 months. The treatment for each period will be randomly assigned. A washout period of 15 days will be applied between the two periods of infusion.
Interventions
The experimental treatment period consists of Ziconotide solution that will be prepared by each local pharmacy team, in 5 or 10 milliliter (ml) vials with constant concentration of 10micrograms/mL
The placebo treatment period consists in standard saline solution (preservative-free sodium chloride 9 milligram/milliliter (mg/ml) (0.9%) solution) which will be presented exactly in vials as presented for the treatment (volume, color, shape et size of the vial). Treating physicians will not be aware of the actual contents of the pump and will increase the volume of injected placebo as a treatment solution (as Ziconotide 10 micrograms/milliliter (μg/ml). The magnitude of increase is the decision of the treating physician (as long as it remains with the recommended limits by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAS) but most likely augmentations will be at maximum 1 microgram per month and maximum achieved doses allowed in SPIDOL study is 20 micrograms/day (in literature approximately 75% of patients who respond satisfactorily to treatment required a dose of ≤ 9.6 micrograms/day
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient \> 18 year old
- Patients with stabilized spinal cord lesion
- Patients with refractory neuropathic pain with "Douleur Neuropathique" (DN4) score \>4 at selection and failure at least of 2 classes of antineuropathic pain drugs alone or in association
- Experiences pain \> 5/10 on numeric scale
- Patients with a positive trial test to Ziconotide either by lumbar puncture or by continuous infusion above the lesioned level via an implanted catheter
- Evaluation performed both by a multidisciplinary team in a pain center and a rehabilitation center
- Patients eligible to surgical implantation of a subcutaneous pump
- Signed informed consent
- Patients benefiting from a social insurance system or a similar system
You may not qualify if:
- Life expectancy \< 5 years
- Suffering from other neuropathic pain or chronic pain due to cancer
- Being treated with spinal cord stimulation, nerve stimulation, intrathecal analgesic delivery system with analgesic drug (except Baclofen) until the last 6 months
- Implant ITZ surgery contraindication (MRI or anesthesia contraindication, coagulation disorder, Immunodepression, current infection, critical respiratory and/or heart illness)
- Unable to operate the ITZ equipment or comply with study requirements
- Suspicion of substance abuse
- Current or planned pregnancy
- Patients with urinary tract disorder or urinary retention
- Patient under or planning to go under electromagnetic transcranial stimulation or planning to
- Patient unable to understand the purpose of the trial or refusing to follow treatment and post-treatment instructions
- Patients with history of psychiatric disorder or hallucination
- Participation to another trial that would interfere with this trial
- Patients under legal protection
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
MERTENS Patrick, MD, PhD
Hospices Civils de Lyon
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 18, 2018
First Posted
May 8, 2019
Study Start
June 20, 2019
Primary Completion
December 20, 2019
Study Completion
September 20, 2021
Last Updated
May 8, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share