NCT03941119

Brief Summary

Behavioural and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia (BPSD) (such as aggression, restlessness, agitation, wandering, anxiety, depression) are common to most people with dementia at some point during their illness and represent an aspect of dementia particularly difficult to manage. There is growing attention to the therapeutic effects of natural environments on people's health. Exposure to natural environments (seeing greenery, hearing outside natural sounds) has been shown to enhance wellbeing, reduce depression, anxiety and stress levels, and decrease hospital length-of-stay for inpatients. Virtual Reality (VR) is a novel technology that uses a Head Mounted Display (HMD) to generate simulated immersive experiences that elicit perceptions and behaviors similar to those in real life and can make one feel as though they are truly present in another place. Based on scientific research, previous studies, and expert consultation, we created a library of VR experiences depicting calming nature scenes designed specifically for people with dementia. The objectives of this RCT are 1) to evaluate the effects of VR-therapy on BPSD and the hospital care experience of in-patients with dementia and/or delirium admitted to an acute care hospital, 2) to determine the usability, tolerability, and safety of VR-therapy for patients with dementia and/or delirium admitted to acute care, 3) determine the effect of VR-therapy on quality of life for patients with dementia and/or delirium admitted to acute care and 4) to explore a framework for introducing non-pharmacological therapies in acute care hospitals. Our hypotheses are 1) VR-therapy helps manage BPSD (e.g. decrease anxiety, aggression, depression, violent behaviors, incidents of wandering), and may decrease the amount and/or frequency of sedatives and anti-depressant medication administered and/or the number of incidents that require restraints, and the number of falls, in people with dementia and/or delirium admitted to an acute care hospital. 2) VR-therapy will improve the quality of life for individuals with dementia and/or delirium admitted to an acute care hospital (operationalized through conducting a validated instrument to measure quality of life for people with dementia). 3) VR-therapy is safe and feasible to administer to individuals with dementia and/or delirium admitted to an acute care hospital (with assistance from their circle of care members and/or caregivers).

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
77

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2019

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 15, 2019

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 6, 2019

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 7, 2019

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 16, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 16, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

November 5, 2020

Status Verified

November 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

11 months

First QC Date

January 15, 2019

Last Update Submit

November 3, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

Virtual RealityBiomedical TechnologyNon-pharmacological InterventionBehavioral SymptomsQuality of LifeGeriatric NursingHealth Services for the AgedHospitals, CommunityCognitive DysfunctionDementiaDelirium

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (8)

  • Changes in Behavioural and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia (BPSD) during the hospital stay

    BPSD recorded in the electronic medical record during the acute hospitalization, averaging 10.6 days, will be assessed for all participants. The E-BEHAVE-AD will be administered to all participants on days 1 and 4-7 of hospitalization

    Throughout the acute hospitalization, an average of 10.6 days

  • Number of falls without injury during the hospital stay

    All falls without injury that occurred during the current acute hospitalization that were recorded in the electronic medical record will be assessed for all participants

    Throughout the acute hospitalization, an average of 10.6 days

  • Number of falls with injury during the hospital stay

    All falls with injury that occurred during the acute hospitalization that were recorded in the electronic medical record will be assessed for all participants

    Throughout the acute hospitalization, an average of 10.6 days

  • Number of pressure ulcers during the hospital stay

    All pressure ulcers that developed during the acute hospitalization that were recorded in the electronic medical record will be assessed for all participants

    Throughout the acute hospitalization, an average of 10.6 days

  • All-cause in-patient mortality during the hospital stay

    If a participant expires during the acute hospitalization, all-cause in-patient mortality will be recorded as described in the electronic medical record including 24 hours after death

    Throughout the acute hospitalization, an average of 10.6 days

  • Length of acute hospital stay

    Number of days of acute hospitalization as recorded by the site staff, will be collected from the electronic medical record after patient's discharge from acute care for all study participants

    At the end of the acute hospitalization, an average of 10.6 days

  • Discharge disposition

    Discharge disposition - The disposition (also called Status) of the patient at time of hospital discharge (i.e., discharged to home, expired, etc.). For each participant, the discharge disposition, will be collected from the electronic medical record on the last day of acute hospitalization

    At the end of the acute hospitalization, an average of 10.6 days

  • 30-day readmission rate

    The number of re-admissions to acute care at this hospital site in the 30 days following discharge will be collected for all participants.

    Within 30 days following the last day of acute hospitalization which is an average of 10.6 days

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Usability of VR-therapy

    Throughout the acute hospitalization, an average of 10.6 days

  • Number of participants with VR-therapy related adverse events as assessed by the post-intervention semi-structured interview and research coordinator observations

    Throughout the acute hospitalization, an average of 10.6 days

  • In-Hospital Quality of Life Observational Scale

    Throughout the acute hospitalization, an average of 10.6 days

  • Participant Experience and Satisfaction of VR-therapy

    Throughout the acute hospitalization, an average of 10.6 days

Study Arms (2)

Intervention

EXPERIMENTAL

The intervention arm will receive a VR-therapy session every 24-72 hours of their stay in the hospital. Participants will view specially designed 360-degree VR films using a Virtual Reality head mounted display for a maximum of 20 minutes per session.

Other: VR-therapy

Control

NO INTERVENTION

The control arm will not receive any VR-therapy sessions during their hospital stay.

Interventions

Wearing a Virtual Reality head mounted device allows the user to become immersed in a virtual environment. We have assembled a library of 3-10 minute 360-degree films from a variety of nature settings. The VR films were intentionally chosen to be calming in distinctive ways, as supported by the literature around nature visualization and wellbeing. By varying 1) the lengths of the films (3, 5, and 10 minutes), 2) the types of natural elements (greenery, earth, sky, water), 3) distance of view (close-ups, vistas), 4) motion (flowing water, wind in trees), 5) sound, and 6) presence of different elements (humans/animals, scenery, urban sites, etc.), the content provides a wide range of attributes that can be collaboratively selected by the individual, caregiver, or health care provider for each individual. We will display these films on commercially available VR equipment and will provide audio matching the film using commercially available headphones.

Also known as: Oculus Go Standalone Virtual Reality Headset, Oculus Go, Virtual Reality Headset, VR Headset, VR HMD, Virtual Reality
Intervention

Eligibility Criteria

Age65 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsOlder Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients who are 65 years of age or older.
  • Patients admitted to Michael Garron Hospital (MGH).
  • Patients diagnosed with, or suspected to have, dementia.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with open wounds on face (sutured lacerations exempted).
  • Patients with a history of seizures or epilepsy.
  • Patients with a pacemaker.
  • Patients with head trauma or stroke leading to their current admission.
  • Patients with cervical conditions or injuries that would make it unsafe for them to use the VR headset.
  • Patients with alcohol related dementia/ Korsakoff syndrome.
  • Patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) or Adult Mental Health Inpatient Service.
  • Patients who require but do not have a Substitute Decision Maker (SDM) or patients from which there is no contactable SDM.
  • Patients who have a Public Guardian and Trustee (PGT) as SDM.
  • Patients who participated in the VRx study during their previous hospitalization and are readmitted less than 30-days after previous hospital discharge.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Michael Garron Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, M4C 3E7, Canada

Location

Related Publications (16)

  • Berman MG, Kross E, Krpan KM, Askren MK, Burson A, Deldin PJ, Kaplan S, Sherdell L, Gotlib IH, Jonides J. Interacting with nature improves cognition and affect for individuals with depression. J Affect Disord. 2012 Nov;140(3):300-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2012.03.012. Epub 2012 Mar 31.

    PMID: 22464936BACKGROUND
  • Brodaty H, Donkin M. Family caregivers of people with dementia. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2009;11(2):217-28. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2009.11.2/hbrodaty.

    PMID: 19585957BACKGROUND
  • Diette GB, Lechtzin N, Haponik E, Devrotes A, Rubin HR. Distraction therapy with nature sights and sounds reduces pain during flexible bronchoscopy: a complementary approach to routine analgesia. Chest. 2003 Mar;123(3):941-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.123.3.941.

    PMID: 12628899BACKGROUND
  • Hughes JC, Louw SJ. Electronic tagging of people with dementia who wander. BMJ. 2002 Oct 19;325(7369):847-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7369.847. No abstract available.

    PMID: 12386013BACKGROUND
  • Kaplan R. The Nature of the View from Home: Psychological Benefits. Sage Publications 33(4): 507-542, 2001.

    BACKGROUND
  • Kaplan S. The restorative benefits of nature: toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology 15: 169-182

    BACKGROUND
  • Morita E, Fukuda S, Nagano J, Hamajima N, Yamamoto H, Iwai Y, Nakashima T, Ohira H, Shirakawa T. Psychological effects of forest environments on healthy adults: Shinrin-yoku (forest-air bathing, walking) as a possible method of stress reduction. Public Health. 2007 Jan;121(1):54-63. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2006.05.024. Epub 2006 Oct 20.

    PMID: 17055544BACKGROUND
  • Park BJ, Tsunetsugu Y, Kasetani T, Kagawa T, Miyazaki Y. The physiological effects of Shinrin-yoku (taking in the forest atmosphere or forest bathing): evidence from field experiments in 24 forests across Japan. Environ Health Prev Med. 2010 Jan;15(1):18-26. doi: 10.1007/s12199-009-0086-9.

    PMID: 19568835BACKGROUND
  • Park SH, Mattson RH. Ornamental indoor plants in hospital rooms enhanced health outcomes of patients recovering from surgery. J Altern Complement Med. 2009 Sep;15(9):975-80. doi: 10.1089/acm.2009.0075.

    PMID: 19715461BACKGROUND
  • Robinson L, Hutchings D, Corner L, Beyer F, Dickinson H, Vanoli A, Finch T, Hughes J, Ballard C, May C, Bond J. A systematic literature review of the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions to prevent wandering in dementia and evaluation of the ethical implications and acceptability of their use. Health Technol Assess. 2006 Aug;10(26):iii, ix-108. doi: 10.3310/hta10260.

    PMID: 16849002BACKGROUND
  • Ulrich RS. View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science. 1984 Apr 27;224(4647):420-1. doi: 10.1126/science.6143402.

    PMID: 6143402BACKGROUND
  • Ulrich, RS. Natural Versus Urban Scenes: Some Psychophysiological Effects. Environment and Behavior 13(5): 523-556, 1981.

    BACKGROUND
  • Ulrich RS. Health Benefits of Gardens in Hospitals. Plants for People International Exhibition Floriade 2002.

    BACKGROUND
  • Ulrich RS, Simons RF, Losito BD, Fiorito E, Miles MA, Zelson M. Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology 11: 201-230, 1991.

    BACKGROUND
  • Weiner MF, Martin-Cook K, Svetlik DA, Saine K, Foster B, Fontaine CS. The quality of life in late-stage dementia (QUALID) scale. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2000 May-Jun;1(3):114-6.

    PMID: 12818023BACKGROUND
  • Appel L, Appel E, Kisonas E, Lewis-Fung S, Pardini S, Rosenberg J, Appel J, Smith C. Evaluating the Impact of Virtual Reality on the Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia and Quality of Life of Inpatients With Dementia in Acute Care: Randomized Controlled Trial (VRCT). J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jan 30;26:e51758. doi: 10.2196/51758.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

DementiaBehavioral SymptomsCognitive DysfunctionDelirium

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Brain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesNeurocognitive DisordersMental DisordersBehaviorCognition DisordersConfusionNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Lora Appel, PhD

    OpenLab, University Health Network

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: This is an open trial, unblinded to both participants and research staff, due to the nature of the intervention. The randomization into VR-therapy or standard of care (no VR-therapy) will be performed using a randomization tool within a secure web application. The sequence allocation will be concealed from those assigning participants to the intervention groups, until the moment of assignment. Participants will be assigned to groups only after informed consent has been obtained.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Collaborating Scientist

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 15, 2019

First Posted

May 7, 2019

Study Start

May 6, 2019

Primary Completion

March 16, 2020

Study Completion

March 16, 2020

Last Updated

November 5, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations