Boiled Peanut Immunotherapy for the Treatment of Peanut Allergy
BOPI-2
1 other identifier
interventional
83
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Peanut allergy is the most common cause of severe allergic reactions to food. Onset is common in childhood, but in contrast to other food allergies such as cow's milk and egg, peanut allergy tends to persist into adulthood. It is associated with a significant impact on quality of life, both for the affected individual and their family. There is no current cure for peanut allergy. Oral peanut immunotherapy (OIT) using defatted, roasted peanut flour has been demonstrated to offer potential in this regard, but is associated with significant and frequent reactions and can cause life-threatening allergic symptoms. The investigators have previously demonstrated that the processing of peanuts through boiling results in a relatively hypoallergenic product due to the loss of key allergenic components from peanut into the water. This has been tested in a recently-completed Phase 2b/3 trial (The BOPI Study, Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02149719; HRA reference 15/LO/0287): 47 children/ young people with peanut allergy confirmed at double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) were randomised (2:1) to receive either oral immunotherapy (updosing using boiled peanut for \~6 months, followed by maintenance with roasted peanut) or standard treatment (allergen avoidance). Participants underwent repeat DBPCFC at 12 months to assess response, following which peanut OIT was stopped and sustained unresponsiveness assessed after 4 weeks (4SU). 24/32 participants (100% per protocol) achieved the primary outcome of desensitisation to \>1.44g peanut protein (approximately 6-8 peanuts, p\<0.0001); of those 14 tolerated \>4.4g peanut protein. 13/24 participants achieved 4SU. There was no significant change in threshold in the control group (p\>0.05). Boiled peanut OIT had a favourable safety profile, with under 2% of doses associated with gastrointestinal symptoms. The BOPI-2 study is a non-inferiority study to demonstrate that boiled peanut is at least as effective as peanut flour in treating children with peanut allergy. The study will compare the rate of adverse events and other safety outcomes between these two interventions, and assess the immunological mechanisms involved, a secondary aim being to develop clinically-useful predictors for identifying individuals likely to undergo successful desensitisation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2019
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 29, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 29, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 6, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2027
ExpectedOctober 19, 2023
October 1, 2023
5 years
April 29, 2019
October 18, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Desensitisation to >1.4g (roasted) peanut protein at food challenge
The proportion of participants who tolerate 1.44g (or more) roasted peanut protein (equivalent to ≥ 6 roasted peanuts) after 12 months of OIT, as assessed by DBPCFC, in each treatment group.
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Adverse events
12 months
Other safety outcomes
12 months
Change in Health-related quality of life (HRQL) from baseline - assessed using FAQLQ
6,12 and 13+ months
Change in Health-related quality of life (HRQL) from baseline - assessed using FAIM
6,12 and 13+ months
Change in Health-related quality of life (HRQL) from baseline - assessed using standardized instrument (EQ-5D)
6,12 and 13+ months
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (2)
Sustained unresponsiveness after 4 weeks cessation of maintenance OIT
After 1 year of OIT
Sustained unresponsiveness after 12+ weeks cessation of maintenance OIT
After 1 year of OIT
Study Arms (2)
Boiled peanut Oral Immunotherapy
EXPERIMENTALDesensitisation using boiled peanut
Conventional Oral immunotherapy
ACTIVE COMPARATORDesensitisation using defatted peanut flour
Interventions
Desensitisation using boiled peanut for induction and initial updosing
Desensitisation using defatted peanut flour for induction and initial updosing
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 7-18 years (enrolment up to a participant's 19th birthday).
- Past history consistent with IgE-mediated peanut allergy
- Allergic to ≤1.44 g peanut protein (approx. 6 peanuts) at baseline double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge, prior to treatment allocation
- Tolerates at least 1/8 boiled peanut (boiled for 4 hours) at open food challenge at screening.
- Written informed consent of parent/legal guardian and patient assent.
You may not qualify if:
- Required previous admission to an intensive care unit for management of an allergic reaction to peanut.
- Clinically significant chronic illness (other than asthma, rhinitis or eczema).
- Undergoing subcutaneous or sublingual immunotherapy to respiratory allergens, and not yet established on maintenance dosing for at least 3 months.
- Undergoing oral immunotherapy for food allergy and within the first year of treatment.
- Subjects receiving anti-IgE therapy, oral immunosuppressants, beta-blocker or ACE inhibitor.
- Tolerance to ≥1.44 g peanut protein (approx. 6 peanuts) at initial DBPCFC during screening.
- Dose-limiting symptoms to 1/8 boiled peanut (boiled for 4 hours) at screening.
- Poorly controlled asthma within the previous 3 months (as defined by clinician judgement with reference to the ICON consensus ), or asthma requiring treatment with \>5 days oral corticosteroids within the previous 3 months.
- Pregnancy
- Unwilling or unable to fulfil study requirements
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Imperial College Londonlead
- University College Corkcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (St. Mary's Hospital)
London, United Kingdom
Related Publications (1)
Muraro A, Dubois AE, DunnGalvin A, Hourihane JO, de Jong NW, Meyer R, Panesar SS, Roberts G, Salvilla S, Sheikh A, Worth A, Flokstra-de Blok BM; European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. EAACI Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Guidelines. Food allergy health-related quality of life measures. Allergy. 2014 Jul;69(7):845-53. doi: 10.1111/all.12405. Epub 2014 May 2.
PMID: 24785644BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Paul J Turner, FRACP PhD
Imperial College London
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- Primary outcome will be assessed by double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 29, 2019
First Posted
May 6, 2019
Study Start
April 29, 2019
Primary Completion
May 1, 2024
Study Completion (Estimated)
May 1, 2027
Last Updated
October 19, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share