Evaluation of the Efficacy of an Antioxidant Dressing in Chronic Wound Healing
REOX
1 other identifier
interventional
54
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to compare the effect of antioxidant dressing (active product) on chronic wound healing with the use of non-active wound dressing for healing in a moist environment (standard clinical practice) in patients with hard-to-heal wounds
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2019
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 24, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 2, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 2, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 31, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 30, 2021
CompletedDecember 21, 2021
December 1, 2021
1.4 years
April 24, 2019
December 20, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change in the score of the RESVECH 2.0 scale for chronic wound healing monitoring
The RESVECH 2.0 is a scale for monitoring the cicatrization of the wound. It has 6 items: size of the lesion, depth/tissue concerned, edges, type of tissue in the wound bed, exudate, infection/inflammation. The scale is scored numerically and can score ranging from 0 to 35 points, wound healed and the worst possible lesion respectively
At baseline, after 2 week, after 4 week, after 6 week and after 8 week
Wound size reduction
Difference in wound area between first and last dressing
At baseline, after 2 week, after 4 week, after 6 week and after 8 week
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Time required to achieve 50% reduction in wound size
Change from baseline to 8 weeks of follow up
Time to removal of non-viable tissue from wound bed
At baseline, after 2 week, after 4 week, after 6 week and after 8 week
Number of completely healed wounds
At baseline, after 2 week, after 4 week, after 6 week and after 8 week
Pain level
At baseline, after 2 week, after 4 week, after 6 week and after 8 week
Area of wound with bacterial load
At baseline, after 2 week, after 4 week, after 6 week and after 8 week
Study Arms (2)
Antioxidant dressing (active product)
EXPERIMENTALUsual care dressing (standard clinical practice)
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Antioxidant dressing (active product), covered with secondary dressing. Compression bandage if necessary. Device: Reoxcare®
Usual care dressing; moist environment dressing chosen from the study centres' formulary (hydrocolloid, alginate, polyurethane foam dressings, silver dressings). Compression bandage if necessary
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients over 18 years of age.
- Patients with leg ulcers (venous, ischemic, traumatic or diabetic foot ulcer).
- Patients with dehisced surgical wounds healing by second intention.
- Patients with pressure ulcers.
- Wound area between 1 and 250 cm2.
You may not qualify if:
- Systemic inflammatory disease or oncological disease.
- Wounds with clinical signs of infection.
- Terminal situation (life expectancy less than 6 months).
- Ulcers from other etiologies: tumours, infectious.
- Wounds treated with negative pressure therapy.
- Pregnancy.
- History of sensitivity or allergy to any of the components of the study dressing.
- In addition, criteria for withdrawal from the study will be considered:
- Worsening of the wound according to the clinical judgment of the professional (appearance of clinical signs of infection or others).
- Appearance of allergies or hypersensitivity to the dressing.
- Death.
- Hospital admission that interrupts or complicates the continuity of care in the Nursing Consultation.
- Transfer to another Health District where there can be no continuity of care with the active dressing.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Jaénlead
- Histocell, S.L.collaborator
- Andalusian Health Service: District Poniente Almería.collaborator
- Andalusian Health Service: District Jaéncollaborator
- Andalusian Health Service: District Jaén-Nordestecollaborator
- Andalusian Health Service: Health Management Area Este of Málaga-Axarquía.collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Universidad de Jaén
Jaén, 23071, Spain
Related Publications (3)
Castro B, Bastida FD, Segovia T, Lopez Casanova P, Soldevilla JJ, Verdu-Soriano J. The use of an antioxidant dressing on hard-to-heal wounds: a multicentre, prospective case series. J Wound Care. 2017 Dec 2;26(12):742-750. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2017.26.12.742.
PMID: 29244974BACKGROUNDCastro B, Palomares T, Azcoitia I, Bastida F, del Olmo M, Soldevilla JJ, Alonso-Varona A. Development and preclinical evaluation of a new galactomannan-based dressing with antioxidant properties for wound healing. Histol Histopathol. 2015 Dec;30(12):1499-512. doi: 10.14670/HH-11-646. Epub 2015 Jul 3.
PMID: 26140672BACKGROUNDComino-Sanz IM, Lopez-Franco MD, Castro B, Pancorbo-Hidalgo PL. Antioxidant dressing therapy versus standard wound care in chronic wounds (the REOX study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2020 Jun 8;21(1):505. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04445-5.
PMID: 32513260BACKGROUND
Related Links
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 24, 2019
First Posted
May 2, 2019
Study Start
September 2, 2019
Primary Completion
January 31, 2021
Study Completion
October 30, 2021
Last Updated
December 21, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-12