Optimizing Exposure Therapy With Mental Rehearsal
1 other identifier
interventional
72
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Treatment response rates for cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) across anxiety disorders average approximately 50% post-treatment (Loerinc et al, 2015), evidencing significant 'return of fear', the re-emergence of a partially or fully extinguished fear (Rachman, 1989). Thus, recent research has amplified efforts toward improving treatment methodology in an attempt to optimize clinical outcomes. Many efforts have targeted exposure therapy, an evidence-based behavioral technique during which a patient is strategically and repeatedly exposed to his or her feared stimulus in an effort to generate new non-fear associations with that stimulus. One such effort involves mental rehearsal, where information is reinstated using either a cue from extinction training or imaginal recounting of previous successful exposures (Craske et al, 2014). Prior research has assessed the effects of mental rehearsal via reinstatement of the extinction context (i.e., treatment context) or of cues/items from the treatment context that may indicate safety (e.g., Mystkowski et al, 2006; Culver, Stoyanova, \& Craske, 2011). However, this research has produced inconsistent results and contains an inherent limitation, as retrieval cues may become a safety signal and inhibit new learning (Dibbets, Havermans, \& Arntz, 2008). In an effort to address these limitations, the current study recruits spider-fearful participants for a treatment trial consisting of exposures in conjunction with either a mental rehearsal intervention, or a control rehearsal intervention. The overarching goal of this project is to evaluate the extent to which a between-session, technology-guided mental rehearsal intervention may optimize exposure therapy outcomes. We also seek to evaluate potential mechanisms of mental rehearsal. Participants complete three laboratory visits, including two sessions of exposures with live spiders. Participants are randomized to either a mental rehearsal or control rehearsal condition to measure potential mechanisms and moderators of mental rehearsal. Laboratory-based assessments include measures of subjective, behavioral, and psychophysiological responses to spiders.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2018
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 23, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 25, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 26, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 26, 2019
CompletedDecember 18, 2019
December 1, 2019
1.1 years
April 25, 2019
December 16, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Spider Phobia Questionnaire (SPQ; Klorman et al, 1974)
31-item true/false questionnaire assessing symptoms of arachnophobia. Scores range from 0 to 31, with greater scores representing greater fear of spiders. Spider phobic individuals have obtained mean scores of 23.20 (SD = 2.90) and 23.76 (SD = 3.80) on the SPQ (Klorman et al, 1974; Murris \& Merckelbach, 1996).
Change from baseline to post-treatment (i.e., 8-10 days)
Behavioral Approach Test (BAT) steps
Number of test steps fully completed
Change from baseline to post-treatment (i.e., 8-10 days)
SCR anticipation
Change in SCR from baseline to BAT anticipation
Change from baseline to post-treatment (i.e., 8-10 days)
SCR across BAT steps
SCR during each 30-second test step fully completed
Change from baseline to post-treatment (i.e., 8-10 days)
Confidence ratings
Repeated confidence ratings on a scale from 0 (no confidence) to 100 (complete confidence) recorded throughout BAT
Change from baseline to post-treatment (i.e., 8-10 days)
Distress ratings
Repeated anticipatory and maximum distress ratings on a scale from 0 (no distress) to 100 (severe distress) recorded throughout BAT
Change from baseline to post-treatment (i.e., 8-10 days)
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21; Lovibond & Lovibond, 1995)
Baseline
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI; Buysse et al, 1989)
Baseline
Aerobic exercise
Baseline
Surprise
Session 1 and Session 2 (i.e., 3 days)
US expectancy
Session 1 and Session 2 (i.e., 3 days)
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Mental Rehearsal
EXPERIMENTALBetween-session rehearsal/retrieval exercises focused upon consolidating non-fear learning gained from exposures by prompting reflection of expectancy violation and rehearsal of the inhibitory association between the conditioned stimulus (i.e., spider) and unconditioned stimulus (e.g., bite/attack).
Control Rehearsal
ACTIVE COMPARATORBetween-session rehearsal/retrieval exercises focused upon an unrelated, recent academic experience.
Interventions
After each exposure session, participants complete three rehearsal/retrieval exercises that involve viewing images of spiders and completing multiple-choice and free-response questions. Exercises involve retrieving information specific to the spider exposures, reflecting on the experience, and highlighting expectancy violation (i.e., that the participant's feared outcome did not occur).
All participants complete two exposure sessions. The first set of exposures consists of ten 30-second trials hovering one's hand 3 inches over a live tarantula. The second set of exposures consists of ten 30-second trials placing one's hand inside the spider's terrarium with all five fingertips touching the bottom.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- English-speaking
- Elevated score on Spider Phobia Questionnaire (SPQ)
You may not qualify if:
- Severe allergies to bees/spiders/insects
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of California, Los Angeles
Los Angeles, California, 90095, United States
Related Publications (52)
Anderson MC, Bjork RA, Bjork EL. Remembering can cause forgetting: retrieval dynamics in long-term memory. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1994 Sep;20(5):1063-87. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.20.5.1063.
PMID: 7931095BACKGROUNDAubry AV, Serrano PA, Burghardt NS. Molecular Mechanisms of Stress-Induced Increases in Fear Memory Consolidation within the Amygdala. Front Behav Neurosci. 2016 Oct 21;10:191. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00191. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 27818625BACKGROUNDBjork, E. L., & Bjork, R. A. (2011). Making things hard on yourself, but in a good way: Creating desirable difficulties to enhance learning. In M. A. Gernsbacher, R. W. Pew, L. M. Hough, J. R. Pomerantz (Eds.) & FABBS Foundation, Psychology and the real world: Essays illustrating fundamental contributions to society (pp. 56-64). New York, NY, US: Worth Publishers.
BACKGROUNDBjork, R. A. (2003). Interference and forgetting. In J. H. Byrne (Ed.), Encyclopedia of learning and memory, 2nd ed., (pp. 268-273). New York: Macmillan Reference USA.
BACKGROUNDBjork, R.A. (2011). On the symbiosis of learning, remembering, and forgetting. In A. S. Benjamin (Ed.), Successful remembering and successful forgetting: a Festschrift in honor of Robert A. Bjork (pp. 1-22). London, UK: Psychology Press.
BACKGROUNDBjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (1992). A new theory of disuse and an old theory of stimulus fluctuation. In A. Healy, S. Kosslyn, & R. Shiffrin (Eds.), From learning processes to cognitive processes: Essays in honor of William K. Estes (pp. 35-67). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
BACKGROUNDBloom, K. C., & Shuell, T. J. (1981). Effects of massed and distributed practice on the learning and retention of second-language vocabulary. The Journal of Educational Research, 74(4), 245-248. doi:10.1080/00220671.1981.10885317
BACKGROUNDBouton, M. E., & Swartzentruber, D. (1991). Sources of relapse after extinction in Pavlovian and instrumental learning. Clinical Psychology Review, 11, 123-140. doi:10.1016/0272-7358(91)90091-8
BACKGROUNDBouton ME, Westbrook RF, Corcoran KA, Maren S. Contextual and temporal modulation of extinction: behavioral and biological mechanisms. Biol Psychiatry. 2006 Aug 15;60(4):352-60. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.12.015. Epub 2006 Apr 17.
PMID: 16616731BACKGROUNDBramham CR, Messaoudi E. BDNF function in adult synaptic plasticity: the synaptic consolidation hypothesis. Prog Neurobiol. 2005 Jun;76(2):99-125. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2005.06.003.
PMID: 16099088BACKGROUNDBuysse DJ, Reynolds CF 3rd, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 1989 May;28(2):193-213. doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4.
PMID: 2748771BACKGROUNDCahill L, Gorski L, Le K. Enhanced human memory consolidation with post-learning stress: interaction with the degree of arousal at encoding. Learn Mem. 2003 Jul-Aug;10(4):270-4. doi: 10.1101/lm.62403.
PMID: 12888545BACKGROUNDCahill L, McGaugh JL. A novel demonstration of enhanced memory associated with emotional arousal. Conscious Cogn. 1995 Dec;4(4):410-21. doi: 10.1006/ccog.1995.1048.
PMID: 8750416BACKGROUNDCain CK, Blouin AM, Barad M. Adrenergic transmission facilitates extinction of conditional fear in mice. Learn Mem. 2004 Mar-Apr;11(2):179-87. doi: 10.1101/lm.71504.
PMID: 15054133BACKGROUNDChoy Y, Fyer AJ, Lipsitz JD. Treatment of specific phobia in adults. Clin Psychol Rev. 2007 Apr;27(3):266-86. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2006.10.002. Epub 2006 Nov 15.
PMID: 17112646BACKGROUNDChristopoulos, G. I., Uy, M. A., & Yap, W. J. (2016). The body and the brain: measuring skin conductance response to understand the emotional experience. Organizational Research Methods, 1-27. doi:10.1177/1094428116681073
BACKGROUNDCotman CW, Berchtold NC, Christie LA. Exercise builds brain health: key roles of growth factor cascades and inflammation. Trends Neurosci. 2007 Sep;30(9):464-72. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2007.06.011. Epub 2007 Aug 31.
PMID: 17765329BACKGROUNDCraske MG, Kircanski K, Zelikowsky M, Mystkowski J, Chowdhury N, Baker A. Optimizing inhibitory learning during exposure therapy. Behav Res Ther. 2008 Jan;46(1):5-27. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2007.10.003. Epub 2007 Oct 7.
PMID: 18005936BACKGROUNDCraske MG, Treanor M, Conway CC, Zbozinek T, Vervliet B. Maximizing exposure therapy: an inhibitory learning approach. Behav Res Ther. 2014 Jul;58:10-23. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2014.04.006. Epub 2014 May 9.
PMID: 24864005BACKGROUNDCulver NC, Stoyanova M, Craske MG. Clinical relevance of retrieval cues for attenuating context renewal of fear. J Anxiety Disord. 2011 Mar;25(2):284-92. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2010.10.002. Epub 2010 Nov 3.
PMID: 21146358BACKGROUNDDibbets P, Havermans R, Arntz A. All we need is a cue to remember: the effect of an extinction cue on renewal. Behav Res Ther. 2008 Sep;46(9):1070-7. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2008.05.007. Epub 2008 Jun 27.
PMID: 18675398BACKGROUNDDonovan, J. J., & Radosevich, D. J. (1999). A meta-analytic review of the distribution of practice effect: Now you see it, now you don't. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(5), 795-805. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.84.5.795
BACKGROUNDDriskell, J. E., Willis, R. P., & Copper, C. (1992). Effect of overlearning on retention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 615-622. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.77.5.615
BACKGROUNDDunsmoor JE, Paz R. Fear Generalization and Anxiety: Behavioral and Neural Mechanisms. Biol Psychiatry. 2015 Sep 1;78(5):336-43. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.04.010. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
PMID: 25981173BACKGROUNDErickson KI, Voss MW, Prakash RS, Basak C, Szabo A, Chaddock L, Kim JS, Heo S, Alves H, White SM, Wojcicki TR, Mailey E, Vieira VJ, Martin SA, Pence BD, Woods JA, McAuley E, Kramer AF. Exercise training increases size of hippocampus and improves memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Feb 15;108(7):3017-22. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1015950108. Epub 2011 Jan 31.
PMID: 21282661BACKGROUNDHofmann SG, Smits JA. Cognitive-behavioral therapy for adult anxiety disorders: a meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials. J Clin Psychiatry. 2008 Apr;69(4):621-32. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v69n0415.
PMID: 18363421BACKGROUNDHotting K, Schickert N, Kaiser J, Roder B, Schmidt-Kassow M. The Effects of Acute Physical Exercise on Memory, Peripheral BDNF, and Cortisol in Young Adults. Neural Plast. 2016;2016:6860573. doi: 10.1155/2016/6860573. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
PMID: 27437149BACKGROUNDKalueff AV. Neurobiology of memory and anxiety: from genes to behavior. Neural Plast. 2007;2007:78171. doi: 10.1155/2007/78171. Epub 2007 Jan 10.
PMID: 17502911BACKGROUNDKarpicke JD, Roediger HL 3rd. The critical importance of retrieval for learning. Science. 2008 Feb 15;319(5865):966-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1152408.
PMID: 18276894BACKGROUNDKircanski K, Lieberman MD, Craske MG. Feelings into words: contributions of language to exposure therapy. Psychol Sci. 2012 Oct 1;23(10):1086-91. doi: 10.1177/0956797612443830. Epub 2012 Aug 16.
PMID: 22902568BACKGROUNDKlorman, R., Weerts, T.C., Hastings, J.E., Melamed, B.G., Lang, P.J. (1974). Psychometric descriptions of some specific fear questionnaires. Behavior Therapy, 5, 401-409. doi:10.1016/S0005-7894(74)80008-0
BACKGROUNDLaine CM, Spitler KM, Mosher CP, Gothard KM. Behavioral triggers of skin conductance responses and their neural correlates in the primate amygdala. J Neurophysiol. 2009 Apr;101(4):1749-54. doi: 10.1152/jn.91110.2008. Epub 2009 Jan 14.
PMID: 19144740BACKGROUNDLang AJ, Craske MG. Manipulations of exposure-based therapy to reduce return of fear: a replication. Behav Res Ther. 2000 Jan;38(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/s0005-7967(99)00031-5.
PMID: 10645020BACKGROUNDLang, A. J., Craske, M. G., & Bjork, R. A. (1999). Implications of a new theory of disuse for the treatment of emotional disorders. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 6, 80-94. doi:10.1093/clipsy/6.1.80
BACKGROUNDLitman L, Davachi L. Distributed learning enhances relational memory consolidation. Learn Mem. 2008 Aug 26;15(9):711-6. doi: 10.1101/lm.1132008. Print 2008 Sep.
PMID: 18772260BACKGROUNDLoerinc AG, Meuret AE, Twohig MP, Rosenfield D, Bluett EJ, Craske MG. Response rates for CBT for anxiety disorders: Need for standardized criteria. Clin Psychol Rev. 2015 Dec;42:72-82. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2015.08.004. Epub 2015 Aug 14.
PMID: 26319194BACKGROUNDLovibond, S.H. & Lovibond, P.F. (1995). Manual for the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales. (2nd Ed.) Sydney: Psychology Foundation.
BACKGROUNDMcGaugh JL. Consolidating memories. Annu Rev Psychol. 2015 Jan 3;66:1-24. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-014954.
PMID: 25559113BACKGROUNDMeeter M, Murre JM. Consolidation of long-term memory: evidence and alternatives. Psychol Bull. 2004 Nov;130(6):843-57. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.130.6.843.
PMID: 15535740BACKGROUNDMeuret AE, Rosenfield D, Bhaskara L, Auchus R, Liberzon I, Ritz T, Abelson JL. Timing matters: Endogenous cortisol mediates benefits from early-day psychotherapy. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2016 Dec;74:197-202. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2016.09.008. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
PMID: 27664810BACKGROUNDMeuret AE, Trueba AF, Abelson JL, Liberzon I, Auchus R, Bhaskara L, Ritz T, Rosenfield D. High cortisol awakening response and cortisol levels moderate exposure-based psychotherapy success. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2015 Jan;51:331-40. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2014.10.008. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
PMID: 25462905BACKGROUNDMuris P, Merckelbach H. A comparison of two spider fear questionnaires. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 1996 Sep;27(3):241-4. doi: 10.1016/s0005-7916(96)00022-5.
PMID: 8959425BACKGROUNDMystkowski JL, Craske MG, Echiverri AM, Labus JS. Mental reinstatement of context and return of fear in spider-fearful participants. Behav Ther. 2006 Mar;37(1):49-60. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2005.04.001. Epub 2006 Feb 24.
PMID: 16942960BACKGROUNDRachman, S. (1989). The return of fear: Review and prospect. Clinical Psychology Review, 9, 147-168. doi:10.1016/0272-7358(89)90025-1
BACKGROUNDRasch B, Born J. About sleep's role in memory. Physiol Rev. 2013 Apr;93(2):681-766. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00032.2012.
PMID: 23589831BACKGROUNDRodriguez BI, Craske MG, Mineka S, Hladek D. Context-specificity of relapse: effects of therapist and environmental context on return of fear. Behav Res Ther. 1999 Sep;37(9):845-62. doi: 10.1016/s0005-7967(98)00106-5.
PMID: 10458048BACKGROUNDRowe MK, Craske MG. Effects of an expanding-spaced vs massed exposure schedule on fear reduction and return of fear. Behav Res Ther. 1998 Jul-Aug;36(7-8):701-17. doi: 10.1016/s0005-7967(97)10016-x.
PMID: 9682526BACKGROUNDRowe MK, Craske MG. Effects of varied-stimulus exposure training on fear reduction and return of fear. Behav Res Ther. 1998 Jul-Aug;36(7-8):719-34. doi: 10.1016/s0005-7967(97)10017-1.
PMID: 9682527BACKGROUNDSoule J, Messaoudi E, Bramham CR. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor and control of synaptic consolidation in the adult brain. Biochem Soc Trans. 2006 Aug;34(Pt 4):600-4. doi: 10.1042/BST0340600.
PMID: 16856871BACKGROUNDSquire LR. Memory and the hippocampus: a synthesis from findings with rats, monkeys, and humans. Psychol Rev. 1992 Apr;99(2):195-231. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.99.2.195.
PMID: 1594723BACKGROUNDVervliet B, Craske MG, Hermans D. Fear extinction and relapse: state of the art. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2013;9:215-48. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185542.
PMID: 23537484BACKGROUNDWolitzky-Taylor KB, Horowitz JD, Powers MB, Telch MJ. Psychological approaches in the treatment of specific phobias: a meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2008 Jul;28(6):1021-37. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2008.02.007. Epub 2008 Mar 7.
PMID: 18410984BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Anastasia L McGlade, MA
University of California, Los Angeles
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michelle G Craske, PhD
University of California, Los Angeles
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 25, 2019
First Posted
May 1, 2019
Study Start
October 23, 2018
Primary Completion
November 26, 2019
Study Completion
November 26, 2019
Last Updated
December 18, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-12