Study Stopped
Company discontinued production of the Porcine Xenograft
Porcine Xenograft Versus Second Intention Healing
1 other identifier
interventional
14
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The purpose of this research study is to test whether it is better to allow patients with post- operative wounds on the legs to heal on their own without a covering or to use a porcine xenograft (skin graft that is made from pig cells) to cover the wound during healing. It is currently not known which option is better in terms of the appearance, complication rate or the impact on the patient's quality of life during the healing process. In this location, it is common receive either treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2019
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 26, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 30, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 11, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2021
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 20, 2023
CompletedMarch 20, 2023
February 1, 2023
1.6 years
April 26, 2019
November 17, 2022
February 22, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) Observer Scale Total Score
The primary outcome will be the total score of the POSAS observer scale, assessed at the 3-month (+/- 1 month) follow-up visit by two blinded evaluators who will not be involved in the placement of the porcine xenograft. For each patient, scores from the two blinded investigators will be combined by calculating the mean. The POSAS (Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale) is a validated assessment tool used for the assessment of all types of scars by professionals and patients. The observer scale is comprised of 6 items (vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, relief, pliability, and surface area) scored on a scale from 1("like normal skin") to 10 ("worst scar imaginable"). The total score is calculated as the sum of the six items (range, 6-60).
Between 2.70 to 8.75 months
Secondary Outcomes (8)
POSAS Patient Scale Total Score
3 months
Healing Time
Up to 38 weeks
Ratio of Scar Size to Initial Defect Size
3 months
Pain Score at 1 Week Following Surgery
1 week
Number of Weeks With Pain Score Above 1
3 months
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Porcine Xenograft placement
EXPERIMENTALPorcine xenograft will be placed on the wound.
No porcine xenograft
NO INTERVENTIONThe wound will be allowed to heal via second intention.
Interventions
The EZ-DERMâ„¢ porcine xenograft is a biosynthetic dressing made from porcine collagen containing aldehyde crosslinking. It has been most commonly applied to the management of 2nd degree burns, both partial-thickness and full-thickness defects. This dressing can be used for two healing purposes, either for primary healing or as an intermediate in the preparation for a skin graft
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Over 18 years of age
- Able to give informed consent themselves
- Willing to return for follow-up visits
- Post-operative defects greater than 8 mm (in greatest diameter or length of circular or oval geometric shape) on the lower extremities (including the feet)
- Single defect
You may not qualify if:
- Mentally handicapped
- Unable to understand written and oral English
- Incarceration
- Under 18 years of age
- Unwilling to return for follow-up
- Pregnant women
- Wounds less than 8 mm in length
- Wounds on the head, neck or digits
- Patients in which primary linear closure is recommended
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Northwell Healthlead
Study Sites (2)
Northwell Health Physician Partners Division of Dermatology
Bay Shore, New York, 11706, United States
Northwell Health Physician Partners Division of Dermatology
Lake Success, New York, 11042, United States
Related Publications (15)
Vanstraelen P. Comparison of calcium sodium alginate (KALTOSTAT) and porcine xenograft (E-Z DERM) in the healing of split-thickness skin graft donor sites. Burns. 1992 Apr;18(2):145-8. doi: 10.1016/0305-4179(92)90014-l.
PMID: 1590931BACKGROUNDDuteille F, Perrot P. Management of 2nd-degree facial burns using the Versajet((R)) hydrosurgery system and xenograft: a prospective evaluation of 20 cases. Burns. 2012 Aug;38(5):724-9. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2011.12.008. Epub 2012 Feb 22.
PMID: 22360953BACKGROUNDRaimer DW, Group AR, Petitt MS, Nosrati N, Yamazaki ML, Davis NA, Kelly BC, Gibson BR, Montilla RD, Wagner RF Jr. Porcine xenograft biosynthetic wound dressings for the management of postoperative Mohs wounds. Dermatol Online J. 2011 Sep 15;17(9):1.
PMID: 21971266BACKGROUNDChiu T, Burd A. "Xenograft" dressing in the treatment of burns. Clin Dermatol. 2005 Jul-Aug;23(4):419-23. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2004.07.027.
PMID: 16023938BACKGROUNDDemling RH, DeSanti L. Management of partial thickness facial burns (comparison of topical antibiotics and bio-engineered skin substitutes). Burns. 1999 May;25(3):256-61. doi: 10.1016/s0305-4179(98)00165-x.
PMID: 10323611BACKGROUNDGerding RL, Imbembo AL, Fratianne RB. Biosynthetic skin substitute vs. 1% silver sulfadiazine for treatment of inpatient partial-thickness thermal burns. J Trauma. 1988 Aug;28(8):1265-9. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198808000-00022.
PMID: 3411648BACKGROUNDHansbrough JF, Zapata-Sirvent R, Carroll WJ, Dominic WJ, Wang XW, Wakimoto A. Clinical experience with Biobrane biosynthetic dressing in the treatment of partial thickness burns. Burns Incl Therm Inj. 1984 Aug;10(6):415-9. doi: 10.1016/0305-4179(84)90081-0.
PMID: 6478287BACKGROUNDHorch RE, Jeschke MG, Spilker G, Herndon DN, Kopp J. Treatment of second degree facial burns with allografts--preliminary results. Burns. 2005 Aug;31(5):597-602. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2005.01.011. Epub 2005 Mar 21.
PMID: 15993304BACKGROUNDBecker D. [Temporary dressing of burn wounds using sterile frozen porcine skin (author's transl)]. Unfallheilkunde. 1981 Apr;84(4):158-60. No abstract available. German.
PMID: 7233629BACKGROUNDHosseini SN, Mousavinasab SN, Fallahnezhat M. Xenoderm dressing in the treatment of second degree burns. Burns. 2007 Sep;33(6):776-81. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2006.10.396. Epub 2007 May 23.
PMID: 17524562BACKGROUNDYang YW, Ochoa SA. Use of Porcine Xenografts in Dermatology Surgery: The Mayo Clinic Experience. Dermatol Surg. 2016 Aug;42(8):985-91. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000804.
PMID: 27340740BACKGROUNDDiwan R, Tromovitch TA, Glogau RG, Stegman SJ. Secondary intention healing. The primary approach for management of selected wounds. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1989 Oct;115(10):1248-9. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1989.01860340102027.
PMID: 2789782BACKGROUNDHowe NR, Lang PG Jr. Daily observations during healing of a full-thickness human surgical wound by second intention. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1991 Dec;17(12):933-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.1991.tb01692.x.
PMID: 1960262BACKGROUNDZitelli JA. Wound healing by secondary intention. A cosmetic appraisal. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1983 Sep;9(3):407-15. doi: 10.1016/s0190-9622(83)70150-7.
PMID: 6630602BACKGROUNDChern PL, Baum CL, Arpey CJ. Biologic dressings: current applications and limitations in dermatologic surgery. Dermatol Surg. 2009 Jun;35(6):891-906. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2009.01153.x. Epub 2009 Apr 6.
PMID: 19397669BACKGROUND
Limitations and Caveats
Limitations include early termination due to discontinuation of the porcine xenograft product by the manufacturer, leading to small number of subjects analyzed. Primary outcome was assessed outside of the pre-planned follow-up window for several patients.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Sr. Clinical Data Analyst
- Organization
- Northwell Health Department of Dermatology
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Victoria Sharon, MD
Northwell Health
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The evaluator will not have knowledge of or access to the intervention that was performed and represents a provider not involved in the surgical care of the patient.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director - Dermatologic Surgery & Dermato-Oncoly, Department of Dermatology, North Shore University Hospital
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 26, 2019
First Posted
April 30, 2019
Study Start
June 11, 2019
Primary Completion
February 1, 2021
Study Completion
February 1, 2021
Last Updated
March 20, 2023
Results First Posted
March 20, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share