Personalized Mobility Interventions Using Smart Sensor Resources for Lower-Limb Prosthesis Users
1 other identifier
interventional
66
1 country
3
Brief Summary
The goal of this research is to analyze data from smartphone-based and wearable sensors, using advanced machine-learning and data-mining techniques, and to combine this information with performance-based measures, participant-reported measures, and structured interviews to create a clinical toolbox to (i) identify individuals who exhibit reduced prosthesis use (compared to expected usage levels based on K-level designation and/or participant goals of community mobility and social interaction), (ii) identify prosthetic/physical and psychological factors that limit prosthesis use, and (iii) determine the effect of targeted interventions to increase prosthesis use and facilitate achievement of participant goals. Objective sensor-based measurement of home and community activities will allow for the correlation of real-world function to in-clinic assessments and to monitor changes resulting from rehabilitation interventions in real time. Machine-learning and data mining techniques will be used to identify a subset of measures from this toolbox that sensitively and accurately reflect real-world function, enabling clinicians to predict and assess activity and provide effective interventions to optimize prosthesis use. The goal of this project, to improve overall performance with respect to activities of daily living and other real-world activities, thus addresses the Fiscal Year 2017 (FY17) Orthotics and Prosthetics Outcomes Research Program (OPORP) Focus Area of Orthotic or Prosthetic Device Function.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2020
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 25, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 29, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2026
January 7, 2026
January 1, 2026
6.7 years
April 25, 2019
January 5, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (9)
Pre-intervention:10 Meter Walk Test (10MWT)
Assesses subject walking speed in meters per second for 10 meters. Subjects will repeat each measure 3 times at their normal self-selected walking speed and 3 times at a fast speed while still able to maintain safety.
Week 12-13
Pre-intervention: 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT)
The 6 minute walk test is performed as an objective evaluation of functional exercise capacity. The test measures the distance that the patient can walk on a flat, hard surface, indoors, in a period of 6 minutes. The walk test is patient self-paced and assesses the level of functional capacity. Patients are allowed to stop and rest during the test, however, the timer does not stop. If the patient is unable to complete the time, the time stopped is noted and reason for stopping prematurely is recorded.
Week 12-13
Pre-intervention: Berg Balance Scale Test
This test is a standardized 14-item objective measure of postural stability and static balance; it is an established fall predictor in adults. Balance is measured during various tasks on a 5 point scale, ranging from 0-4. "0" indicates the lowest level of function and "4" the highest level of function, with a total possible score of 56. A score of 20 or less indicates a high fall risk.
Week 12-13
Post-intervention:10 Meter Walk Test (10MWT)
Assesses subject walking speed in meters per second for 10 meters. Subjects will repeat each measure 3 times at their normal self-selected walking speed and 3 times at a fast speed while still able to maintain safety.
Week 24-25
Post-intervention: 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT)
The 6 minute walk test is performed as an objective evaluation of functional exercise capacity. The test measures the distance that the patient can walk on a flat, hard surface, indoors, in a period of 6 minutes. The walk test is patient self-paced and assesses the level of functional capacity. Patients are allowed to stop and rest during the test, however, the timer does not stop. If the patient is unable to complete the time, the time stopped is noted and reason for stopping prematurely is recorded. This test will be administered while wearing a mask to measure oxygen consumption.
Week 24-25
Post-intervention: Berg Balance Scale Test
This test is a standardized 14-item objective measure of postural stability and static balance; it is an established fall predictor in adults. Balance is measured during various tasks on a 5 point scale, ranging from 0-4. "0" indicates the lowest level of function and "4" the highest level of function, with a total possible score of 56. A score of 20 or less indicates a high fall risk.
Week 24-25
Delayed post-intervention:10 Meter Walk Test (10MWT)
Assesses subject walking speed in meters per second for 10 meters. Subjects will repeat each measure 3 times at their normal self-selected walking speed and 3 times at a fast speed while still able to maintain safety.
Week 40-41
Delayed post-intervention: 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT)
The 6 minute walk test is performed as an objective evaluation of functional exercise capacity. The test measures the distance that the patient can walk on a flat, hard surface, indoors, in a period of 6 minutes. The walk test is patient self-paced and assesses the level of functional capacity. Patients are allowed to stop and rest during the test, however, the timer does not stop. If the patient is unable to complete the time, the time stopped is noted and reason for stopping prematurely is recorded. This test will be administered while wearing a mask to measure oxygen consumption.
Week 40-41
Delayed post-intervention: Berg Balance Scale Test
This test is a standardized 14-item objective measure of postural stability and static balance; it is an established fall predictor in adults. Balance is measured during various tasks on a 5 point scale, ranging from 0-4. "0" indicates the lowest level of function and "4" the highest level of function, with a total possible score of 56. A score of 20 or less indicates a high fall risk.
Week 40-41
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Pre-intervention: Amputee Mobility Predictor (AMP)
Week 12-13
Pre-intervention: Modified Falls Efficacy Scale (mFES)
Week 12-13
Post-intervention: Amputee Mobility Predictor (AMP)
Week 24-25
Post-intervention: Modified Falls Efficacy Scale (mFES)
Week 24-25
Delayed post-intervention: Amputee Mobility Predictor (AMP)
Week 40-41
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Not Meeting Mobility Goals
EXPERIMENTALAfter the first three months of sensor monitoring, participants not meeting goals will receive an intervention (others will be removed from the study). The intervention assigned is not pre-determined, but will be assigned by an expert panel based on the individual needs determined from the assessment results and monitoring data. The intervention may include prosthetic care, physical therapy, motivational interviewing or other related psychological interventions, or a combination thereof. After three months of intervention, assessments are performed again and if improvement in prosthesis use is determined, participants are monitored for another three months to assess maintenance of prosthesis use (participants showing no improvement are removed from the study before these final three months of monitoring).
Interventions
Individuals identified as having physical issues (poor prosthesis fit, function, comfort or physical conditioning) will receive prosthetic care and physical therapy. This includes adjusting socket fit, component fit and repair, and in some instances replacement. Rehabilitation strategies include gait and prosthesis use retraining, balance fall-prevention, and range-of-motion training, strengthening, pain management, and activities of daily living training, based on participant-reported mobility goals. Individuals whose prosthesis use is reduced due to psychological issues will be provided with motivational interviewing and other related psychological interventions. During these interventions participant will be asked to set personal goals using a semi-structured interview that explores facilitators and barriers to wearing their prosthesis. If both physical and psychological issues are present, participant may receive both types of interventions simultaneously.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Unilateral or bilateral lower limb amputation at transtibial or transfemoral level
- Ability to wear and use a prosthesis
- Designated K-level 2 - 4, or equivalent
- Prescription of definitive prosthesis
- Veterans Affairs participants must receive care through the Veterans Affairs or related remote-site clinic
- Age: 18-89 years-to reflect the age range of eligible participants at Department of Defense and Veterans Affairs study sites, including young, combat-injured Service Members and healthy older Veterans, aged 70-80.
You may not qualify if:
- Co-morbidities that limit prosthesis use, independently of prosthetic function, training, or motivation, such as stroke, obesity, severe traumatic brain injury, and neuralgia, which require interventions outside the scope of this study. Suitability to participate in the study will be determined by the individual's physician.
- Unable or unwilling to learn to use the smartphone app or to allow transmission of study data
- Unable or unwilling to provide informed consent
- Residing in an area with poor cell phone coverage
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Shirley Ryan AbilityLablead
- Walter Reed National Military Medical Centercollaborator
- Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Centercollaborator
Study Sites (3)
Shirley Ryan AbilityLab
Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States
Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Center for Rehabilitation Sciences Research
Bethesda, Maryland, 20889, United States
Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55417, United States
Related Publications (2)
McGuire M, Nataletti S, Maronati R, Hoppe-Ludwig S, Banerjee A, Wacek A, Cave J, Looft JM, Dearth CL, Hendershot BD, Jayaraman A. References values and standardized testing protocols for performance-based and patient-reported outcome measures among individuals with lower limb amputation. Front Rehabil Sci. 2026 Mar 13;7:1786298. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2026.1786298. eCollection 2026.
PMID: 41908176DERIVEDB Aledi L, Flumignan CD, Trevisani VF, Miranda F Jr. Interventions for motor rehabilitation in people with transtibial amputation due to peripheral arterial disease or diabetes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jun 5;6(6):CD013711. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013711.pub2.
PMID: 37276273DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Arun Jayaraman, PT, PhD
Shirley Ryan AbilityLab
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 25, 2019
First Posted
April 29, 2019
Study Start
May 1, 2020
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Last Updated
January 7, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01