NCT03929081

Brief Summary

Rationale: Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) is a disabling neuropsychiatric disorder that often has a chronic disease course. The standard psychotherapeutic treatment Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) is unable to redeem about half of all patients and is rejected by many because of its anxiety provoking methods. A promising alternative is the Interference Based Approach (IBA), which appears to be as effective as CBT, and more effective for patients with poor insight. The current study will investigate the proposed IBA non-inferiority to CBT. Furthermore, the neurobiological working mechanisms of both treatments will be investigated. Both treatment modalities are expected to alter activity and connectivity in different functional brain networks. In order to lead the way towards personalized care for OCD patients, clinical and neurobiological predictors of response to treatment will be studied. The eventual aim of this study is to prevent the demoralizing effect of undergoing an ineffective treatment by future prediction of whether an individual patient will respond better to IBA or CBT. This also contributes to solving the costs and waiting times for CBT. Objective: To investigate non-inferiority of IBA compared to CBT and to unravel the neurobiological working mechanisms of both treatment modalities. Study design: Multicentre randomized controlled trial. Study population: 203 adults with a primary diagnosis of OCD and 43 healthy controls, matched on gender, age and educational level. Intervention: The 203 adults with the primary diagnosis of OCD will be divided into the experimental- (IBA) and control intervention (CBT). Healthy controls will not receive an intervention. Main study parameters/endpoints: Clinical measures (e.g. severity of OCD symptoms, disease insight), neurocognitive capabilities (performance on neuropsychological tests), neural correlates on brain structure (i.e. white matter integrity, grey matter volume) and brain function (i.e., activation and connectivity during resting state and symptom provocation) using 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
246

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2019

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

7 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 20, 2019

Completed
18 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 7, 2019

Completed
19 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 26, 2019

Completed
4.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 17, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 17, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

October 24, 2023

Status Verified

October 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

4.6 years

First QC Date

April 7, 2019

Last Update Submit

October 23, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

Obsessive-Compulsive DisorderInference Based Approach (IBA)Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT)Personalized careNeurocognitive working mechanisms of treatmentNon-inferiorityPrediction of treatment efficiency

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change from baseline score on the Yale Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (YBOCS) after 20 sessions IBA or CBT, and after 6 months and 1 year post treatment

    The YBOCS (range 0-40, higher values representing worse outcome) measures OCD symptom severity

    at baseline; post intervention at week 20; at follow up 6 months post week 20; at follow up 12 months post week 20

Secondary Outcomes (18)

  • Change from baseline brain morphology measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) after 20 sessions IBA or CBT

    at baseline; post intervention at week 20

  • Change from baseline structural connectivity measured by Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) after 20 sessions IBA or CBT

    at baseline; post intervention at week 20

  • Change from baseline activity and functional connectivity measured by resting state functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (rs-fMRI) after 20 sessions IBA or CBT

    at baseline; post intervention at week 20

  • Change from baseline activity and functional connectivity measured by functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) during OCD symptom provocation after 20 sessions IBA or CBT

    at baseline; post intervention at week 20

  • Change from baseline score on the Overvalued Ideas Scale (OVIS) after 20 sessions IBA or CBT, and after 6 months and 1 year post treatment

    at baseline; post intervention at week 20; at follow up 6 months post week 20; at follow up 12 months post week 20

  • +13 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (2)

  • Change on performance on the Confidence Accuracy Task after 20 sessions of IBA or CBT

    at baseline; post intervention at week 20

  • Change of valence rating of symptom provocation stimuli after 20 sessions of IBA or CBT

    at baseline; post intervention at week 20

Study Arms (3)

Inference Based Approach (IBA)

EXPERIMENTAL

The IBA treatment, a focused form of psychotherapy consists of twenty 45-minutes sessions, delivered weekly. The IBA model is based on the assumption that patients with OCD feel the need to perform compulsive acts because they misjudge the actual state of affairs, for example fearing that an appliance is on when it is visibly off. It is assumed that certain reasoning processes lead to these erroneous conclusions and distract the patient's attention from observable reality. IBA teaches patients how to defend themselves against the absorbing and confusing effect of obsessive reasoning processes and how to stay in touch with reality by actively relying on the sensory information of the very moment. As a consequence, the patient realizes that any compulsive act is superfluous and feels able to omit it.

Behavioral: Inference Based Approach (IBA)

Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

In the control condition, the patients will receive twenty 45-minutes sessions of CBT consisting of self-guided exposure in vivo with response prevention (ERP) and cognitive therapy (CT), both standardized according to evidence-based session-by-session protocols, containing standardized forms for exercises and homework assignments.

Behavioral: Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT)

No intervention (healthy controls)

NO INTERVENTION

The healthy control group will receive no intervention.

Interventions

The Inference Based Approach aims at strengthening reality testing in patients with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, by teaching the patient to actively rely on sensory information.

Also known as: Psychotherapy
Inference Based Approach (IBA)

CBT teaches the patient with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder to refrain from compulsive acts.

Also known as: Psychotherapy
Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 85 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Participants
  • Referred to one of the participating sites for OCD treatment
  • Age 18 or above
  • Primary Diagnostic Statistical Manual (DSM)-5 diagnosis of OCD (established by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 (SCID)
  • Moderate to severe OCD symptoms (expressed as a minimum score of 16 on the Yale Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (YBOCS)
  • Not currently using psychotropic medication, or on a stable dose for at least 12 weeks prior to randomisation with no plans to change the dose during the course of the study (this will be monitored during the study)
  • If CBT already has been received for OCD, treatment has ended at least 26 weeks before study participation.
  • Controls
  • \- Age 18 or above

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients
  • Suffering from a current psychotic disorder, organic mental disorder, substance use disorder or mental retardation
  • No sufficient command of the Dutch language
  • Use of psychotropic medication other than Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor/Selective Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitor/clomipramine (e.g. antipsychotics). Occasional (not daily, a maximal equivalent of 10 mg. diazepam at a time) use of benzodiazepines/sleeping medication is allowed, if the participant is willing to tolerate to refrain from use for at least a week before the MRI scanning session, and able to tolerate this period of refrainment.
  • Pregnancy
  • Iron in the body
  • Claustrophobia
  • Any known neurological diseases (including epilepsy) or brain surgery
  • Head trauma that resulted in unconsciousness for at least 1 hour
  • Age 65 or above
  • Controls
  • Age 65 or above
  • Current DSM-5 diagnosis (established by the SCID)
  • Personal history of DSM-5 diagnosis, except for depressive or anxiety disorder longer than 12 months ago
  • Personal history or current use of psychotropic medication (excluding sporadic use of sedatives/benzodiazepines, not having been used the week prior to participation
  • +7 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (7)

GGz Drenthe

Assen, Drenthe, 9404 LA, Netherlands

Location

GGz Centraal

Ermelo, Gelderland, 3853 LC, Netherlands

Location

Pro Persona

Nijmegen, Gelderland, 6503 CG, Netherlands

Location

Mondriaan

Maastricht, Limburg, 6226 NB, Netherlands

Location

GGz InGeest

Amsterdam, North Holland, 1081 HJ, Netherlands

Location

Amsterdam UMC, VUmc

Amsterdam, North Holland, 1081 HV, Netherlands

Location

PsyQ Amsterdam

Amsterdam, North Holland, 1101 DM, Netherlands

Location

Related Publications (19)

  • Abramowitz JS. The psychological treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder. Can J Psychiatry. 2006 Jun;51(7):407-16. doi: 10.1177/070674370605100702.

    PMID: 16838822BACKGROUND
  • Abramowitz JS, Taylor S, McKay D. Potentials and limitations of cognitive treatments for obsessive-compulsive disorder. Cogn Behav Ther. 2005;34(3):140-7. doi: 10.1080/16506070510041202.

    PMID: 16195053BACKGROUND
  • Adler CM, McDonough-Ryan P, Sax KW, Holland SK, Arndt S, Strakowski SM. fMRI of neuronal activation with symptom provocation in unmedicated patients with obsessive compulsive disorder. J Psychiatr Res. 2000 Jul-Oct;34(4-5):317-24. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3956(00)00022-4.

    PMID: 11104844BACKGROUND
  • Andrews-Hanna JR, Smallwood J, Spreng RN. The default network and self-generated thought: component processes, dynamic control, and clinical relevance. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2014 May;1316(1):29-52. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12360. Epub 2014 Feb 6.

    PMID: 24502540BACKGROUND
  • Banks SJ, Eddy KT, Angstadt M, Nathan PJ, Phan KL. Amygdala-frontal connectivity during emotion regulation. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2007 Dec;2(4):303-12. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsm029.

    PMID: 18985136BACKGROUND
  • Bari A, Robbins TW. Inhibition and impulsivity: behavioral and neural basis of response control. Prog Neurobiol. 2013 Sep;108:44-79. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.06.005. Epub 2013 Jul 13.

    PMID: 23856628BACKGROUND
  • Boedhoe PS, Schmaal L, Abe Y, Ameis SH, Arnold PD, Batistuzzo MC, Benedetti F, Beucke JC, Bollettini I, Bose A, Brem S, Calvo A, Cheng Y, Cho KI, Dallaspezia S, Denys D, Fitzgerald KD, Fouche JP, Gimenez M, Gruner P, Hanna GL, Hibar DP, Hoexter MQ, Hu H, Huyser C, Ikari K, Jahanshad N, Kathmann N, Kaufmann C, Koch K, Kwon JS, Lazaro L, Liu Y, Lochner C, Marsh R, Martinez-Zalacain I, Mataix-Cols D, Menchon JM, Minuzzi L, Nakamae T, Nakao T, Narayanaswamy JC, Piras F, Piras F, Pittenger C, Reddy YC, Sato JR, Simpson HB, Soreni N, Soriano-Mas C, Spalletta G, Stevens MC, Szeszko PR, Tolin DF, Venkatasubramanian G, Walitza S, Wang Z, van Wingen GA, Xu J, Xu X, Yun JY, Zhao Q; ENIGMA OCD Working Group; Thompson PM, Stein DJ, van den Heuvel OA. Distinct Subcortical Volume Alterations in Pediatric and Adult OCD: A Worldwide Meta- and Mega-Analysis. Am J Psychiatry. 2017 Jan 1;174(1):60-69. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.16020201. Epub 2016 Sep 9.

    PMID: 27609241BACKGROUND
  • Eisen JL, Rasmussen SA, Phillips KA, Price LH, Davidson J, Lydiard RB, Ninan P, Piggott T. Insight and treatment outcome in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Compr Psychiatry. 2001 Nov-Dec;42(6):494-7. doi: 10.1053/comp.2001.27898.

    PMID: 11704942BACKGROUND
  • O'Connor KP, Aardema F, Bouthillier D, Fournier S, Guay S, Robillard S, Pelissier MC, Landry P, Todorov C, Tremblay M, Pitre D. Evaluation of an inference-based approach to treating obsessive-compulsive disorder. Cogn Behav Ther. 2005;34(3):148-63. doi: 10.1080/16506070510041211.

    PMID: 16195054BACKGROUND
  • van Oppen P, van Balkom AJ, de Haan E, van Dyck R. Cognitive therapy and exposure in vivo alone and in combination with fluvoxamine in obsessive-compulsive disorder: a 5-year follow-up. J Clin Psychiatry. 2005 Nov;66(11):1415-22. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v66n1111.

    PMID: 16420079BACKGROUND
  • Visser HA, van Oppen P, van Megen HJ, Eikelenboom M, van Balkom AJ. Obsessive-compulsive disorder; chronic versus non-chronic symptoms. J Affect Disord. 2014 Jan;152-154:169-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.09.004. Epub 2013 Sep 13.

    PMID: 24084621BACKGROUND
  • Schumi J, Wittes JT. Through the looking glass: understanding non-inferiority. Trials. 2011 May 3;12:106. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-106.

    PMID: 21539749BACKGROUND
  • Olatunji BO, Davis ML, Powers MB, Smits JA. Cognitive-behavioral therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder: a meta-analysis of treatment outcome and moderators. J Psychiatr Res. 2013 Jan;47(1):33-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2012.08.020. Epub 2012 Sep 20.

    PMID: 22999486BACKGROUND
  • Visser HA, van Megen H, van Oppen P, Eikelenboom M, Hoogendorn AW, Kaarsemaker M, van Balkom AJ. Inference-Based Approach versus Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in the Treatment of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder with Poor Insight: A 24-Session Randomized Controlled Trial. Psychother Psychosom. 2015;84(5):284-93. doi: 10.1159/000382131. Epub 2015 Aug 6.

    PMID: 26278470BACKGROUND
  • Thorsen AL, van den Heuvel OA, Hansen B, Kvale G. Neuroimaging of psychotherapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder: A systematic review. Psychiatry Res. 2015 Sep 30;233(3):306-13. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2015.05.004. Epub 2015 May 16.

    PMID: 26228566BACKGROUND
  • Goodman WK, Price LH, Rasmussen SA, Mazure C, Fleischmann RL, Hill CL, Heninger GR, Charney DS. The Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale. I. Development, use, and reliability. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1989 Nov;46(11):1006-11. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1989.01810110048007.

    PMID: 2684084BACKGROUND
  • Goodman WK, Price LH, Rasmussen SA, Mazure C, Delgado P, Heninger GR, Charney DS. The Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale. II. Validity. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1989 Nov;46(11):1012-6. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1989.01810110054008.

    PMID: 2510699BACKGROUND
  • Rubinov M, Sporns O. Complex network measures of brain connectivity: uses and interpretations. Neuroimage. 2010 Sep;52(3):1059-69. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.003. Epub 2009 Oct 9.

    PMID: 19819337BACKGROUND
  • Bullmore E, Sporns O. Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009 Mar;10(3):186-98. doi: 10.1038/nrn2575. Epub 2009 Feb 4.

    PMID: 19190637BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

Interventions

PsychotherapyCognitive Behavioral Therapy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Anxiety DisordersMental Disorders

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavioral Disciplines and ActivitiesBehavior Therapy

Study Officials

  • Henny Visser, PhD

    GGZ Centraal

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR
Masking Details
The research assessors will be blinded for treatment allocation. Partcipants and clinicians will be requested not to reveal information about treatment allocation to the assessors.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: This is a multicenter, randomized controlled non-inferiority trial. 203 OCD patients will be recruited. During intake for treatment, patients willing to participate, will be invited for a baseline visit, after the Informed Consent process (IC). Then the patient will be randomized to 20 sessions IBA or 20 sessions CBT. Randomization ratio is 1:1, stratified by site. OCD symptom severity will be assessed by a blind assessor at baseline, after 20 sessions, and 6 and 12 months after posttest. Further, OCD symptom severity and insight in OCD symptoms will be assessed (self-report) weekly. To explore working mechanisms, 43 patients of each treatment arm will receive pre- and posttreatment brain imaging and neuropsychological assessment. After randomization, patients are screened for MRI eligibility, until the sufficient amount of participants is reached. A complementary IC will be signed. 43 healthy controls will receive a single brain imaging and neuropsychological testing session.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 7, 2019

First Posted

April 26, 2019

Study Start

March 20, 2019

Primary Completion

October 17, 2023

Study Completion

October 17, 2023

Last Updated

October 24, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations