Efficacy of Air Cleaners in Asthmatics Allergic to Cat in ALYATEC Environmental Exposure Chamber
1 other identifier
interventional
24
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to determine the efficacy of Rowenta® "Intense Pure Air XL" air cleaner on the early and late bronchial response, in cat-allergic asthmatic patients during an allergen exposure in ALYATEC environmental chamber (EEC)
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable asthma
Started Dec 2017
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable asthma
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 6, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 30, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 19, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 23, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 26, 2019
CompletedDecember 16, 2020
April 1, 2019
2 months
April 23, 2019
December 14, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Frequency of early asthmatic response
In subjects exposed in the EEC to an average cat allergen concentration of 40 ng/m3 (Feld1) in presence of an active air cleaner compared to a placebo. Early asthmatic response is defined by a drop of at least 20% compared to baseline FEV1.
Week 9
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Frequency of late asthmatic response
Week 9
Severity of early and/or late asthmatic response
Week 9
Difference of asthma symptoms during exposure to cat allergen with active air cleaners versus placebo.
Week 9
Difference of rhinitis symptoms during exposure to cat allergen with active air cleaners versus placebo.
Week 9
Difference of rhinitis symptoms during exposure to cat allergen with active air cleaners versus placebo.
Week 9
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
1 - Active air cleaner then Placebo
EXPERIMENTALExposure to cat allergen in the presence of active air cleaners then placebo. 3-week wash-out period between the two exposures.
2 - Placebo then active air cleaner
EXPERIMENTALExposure to cat allergen in the presence of placebo then active air cleaners. 3-week wash-out period between the two exposures.
Interventions
Cat allergen is nebulized in the EEC. When the concentration is stable, air cleaners are switched on. The number of air cleaners placed in the EEC is defined according to the volume of the EEC and the air renewal. Patients are exposed to cat allergen in the presence of active air cleaners in the EEC
Cat allergen is nebulized in the EEC. When the concentration is stable, placebo air cleaners are switched on. The placebo effect is obtained thanks to the removal of air cleaners filters prior to the exposure. The number of placebo air cleaners placed in the EEC is defined according to the volume of the EEC and the air renewal. Patients are exposed to cat allergen in the presence of placebo air cleaners in the EEC.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Controlled intermittent asthma (step 1 treatment, according to GINA Guideline 2016) with or without association with cat allergy related rhino-conjunctivitis;
- Sensitization to cat allergen extract as defined by skin prick test for cat extract with a wheal diameter of ≥3 mm greater than negative control (ALK, HØrsholm, Denmark) and specific IgE anti Fel d 1 ≥ 0.7 kU/L ( ImmunoCAP, Thermofisher, Uppsala, Sweden);
- FEV1 ≥ 70% of the predicted value;
- No cat exposure at home or outside of the home during the study;
- Positive methacholine challenge test performed using an AeroDoseur DTF-Atomisor ATO-AD 12 (Saint-Etienne, France);
- Early asthmatic response during baseline cat allergen exposure.
You may not qualify if:
- Uncontrolled asthma, asthma control test inferior to 20 within the 4 weeks preceding the study.
- Uncontrolled asthma 2 weeks after stopping LABA treatment.
- LABA treatment within the 2 weeks preceding the study.
- Severe asthma (\> GINA 2)
- Subject lives with a cat
- Cat desensibilisation within the 6 previous months.
- Active smoker
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Alyateclead
Study Sites (1)
Alyatec
Strasbourg, Bas-Rhin, 67000, France
Related Publications (2)
Khayath N, Doyen V, Gherasim A, Radu C, Choual I, Beck N, Jacob A, Schoettel F, Vecellio L, Domis N, de Blay F. Validation of Strasbourg environmental exposure chamber (EEC) ALYATEC(R) in mite allergic subjects with asthma. J Asthma. 2020 Feb;57(2):140-148. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2018.1563902. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
PMID: 30919704BACKGROUNDGherasim A, Jacob A, Schoettel F, Domis N, de Blay F. Efficacy of air cleaners in asthmatics allergic to cat in ALYATEC(R) environmental exposure chamber. Clin Exp Allergy. 2020 Feb;50(2):160-169. doi: 10.1111/cea.13511. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
PMID: 31596983DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Frédéric de Blay, MD
Strasbourg University Hospital - Alyatec
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 23, 2019
First Posted
April 26, 2019
Study Start
December 6, 2017
Primary Completion
January 30, 2018
Study Completion
February 19, 2018
Last Updated
December 16, 2020
Record last verified: 2019-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share