NCT03928184

Brief Summary

This phase 3 study is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of lorecivivint injected intra-articularly (IA) into the target knee (most painful) joint of moderately to severely symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) subjects at a single dose of 0.07 mg lorecivivint per 2 mL injection. This study will utilize radiographs and patient reported outcomes (PROs) to evaluate the safety and efficacy of lorecivivint.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
501

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_3 knee-osteoarthritis

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2019

Typical duration for phase_3 knee-osteoarthritis

Geographic Reach
1 country

99 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 23, 2019

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 26, 2019

Completed
21 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 17, 2019

Completed
2.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 20, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 20, 2021

Completed
4.5 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

February 13, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

February 13, 2026

Status Verified

January 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

2.3 years

First QC Date

April 23, 2019

Results QC Date

December 11, 2025

Last Update Submit

January 28, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

SM04690Wnt pathway inhibitorosteoarthritisSamumedlorecivivint

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change From Baseline in OA Pain in the Target Knee (Pain NRS)

    Evaluate change from baseline OA pain in the target knee as assessed by the weekly averages of daily pain numeric rating scale (NRS). The pain NRS is an 11-point scale \[0-10\] for subject self-reporting of average knee pain in the last 24 hours; 0 indicates no pain, and 10 represents the worst possible pain.

    Baseline and Week 12

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • Change From Baseline in OA Pain in the Target Knee (Pain NRS)

    Baseline and Week 24

  • Change From Baseline in OA Pain in the Target Knee (Pain NRS)

    Baseline and Week 52

  • Change From Baseline in OA Function in the Target Knee (WOMAC Function)

    Baseline and Week 12

  • Change From Baseline in OA Function in the Target Knee (WOMAC Function)

    Baseline and Week 24

  • Change From Baseline in OA Function in the Target Knee (WOMAC Function)

    Baseline and Week 52

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Change From Baseline in Medial Joint Space Width (mJSW) in the Target Knee

    Baseline and Week 52

Study Arms (2)

0.07 mg lorecivivint

EXPERIMENTAL

One intra-articular injection of 0.07 mg lorecivivint in 2 ml vehicle

Drug: Lorecivivint

Vehicle

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

One intra-articular injection of 0 mg lorecivivint in 2 ml vehicle

Drug: Placebo

Interventions

Healthcare professional-administered intra-articular injection; performed on Day 1

Also known as: Vehicle
Vehicle

Healthcare professional-administered intra-articular injection; performed on Day 1

Also known as: SM04690
0.07 mg lorecivivint

Eligibility Criteria

Age40 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Males and females between 40 and 80 years of age, inclusive, in general good health apart from their knee OA
  • Ambulatory (single assistive devices such as canes allowed if needed less than 50% of the time, subjects requiring a walker are excluded)
  • Diagnosis of femorotibial OA in the target knee by standard American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria at the Screening Visit (clinical AND radiographic criteria); OA of the knee is not to be secondary to any rheumatologic conditions (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis)
  • mJSW by radiograph between 1.5 and 4 mm, inclusive, in the target knee within 12 weeks of the Screening Visit as assessed by independent central readers
  • Radiographic disease Stage 2 or 3 in the target knee within 12 weeks of the Screening Visit according to the Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grading of knee OA as assessed by independent central readers
  • Pain compatible with OA of the knee(s) for at least 26 weeks prior to the Screening Visit
  • Primary source of pain throughout the body is due to OA in the target knee
  • Body mass index (BMI) ≤ 40 kg/m2 at the Screening Visit
  • Widespread Pain Index (WPI) score of ≤ 4 and a Symptom Severity Question 2 (SSQ2) score of ≤ 2 at the Screening Visit and Day 1
  • Pain NRS scores recorded for the target knee on at least 4 out of the 7 days immediately preceding Day 1
  • Pain NRS scores recorded for the nontarget knee on at least 4 out of the 7 days immediately preceding Day 1
  • Daily OA knee pain diary average NRS intensity score ≥ 4 and ≤ 8 in the target knee on the 11-point (0-10) NRS scale for the 7 days immediately preceding Day 1
  • Daily OA knee pain diary average NRS intensity score \< 4 in the nontarget knee on the 11-point (0-10) NRS scale for the 7 days immediately preceding Day 1
  • WOMAC Pain of 20-40 (out of 50) for the target knee at baseline regardless of if the subject is on symptomatic oral treatment (baseline questionnaire completed during the screening period prior to randomization)
  • WOMAC Function of 68-136 (out of 170) for the target knee at baseline regardless of if the subject is on symptomatic oral treatment (baseline questionnaire completed during the screening period prior to randomization)
  • +5 more criteria

You may not qualify if:

  • Pregnant women, breastfeeding woman, and women who are not post-menopausal (defined as 12 months with no menses without an alternative medical cause) or permanently surgically sterile (includes hysterectomy, bilateral salpingectomy, and bilateral oophorectomy), who have a positive or indeterminate pregnancy test result at the Screening Visit or Day 1
  • Women who are not post-menopausal or permanently surgically sterile who are sexually active, and who are not willing to use birth control during the study period
  • Men who are sexually active and of reproductive potential, who have partners who are capable of becoming pregnant, and who are not willing to use birth control during the study period
  • Significant malalignment of anatomical axis (medial angle formed by the femur and tibia) of the target knee (varus \> 10°, valgus \> 10°) by radiograph within 12 weeks of the Screening Visit as assessed by independent central readers
  • Partial or complete joint replacement in either knee
  • Currently requires use of a lower extremity prosthesis, and/or a structural knee brace (i.e., a knee brace that contains hardware)
  • Any surgery (e.g., arthroscopy) in either knee within 26 weeks prior to Day 1
  • Intra-articular (IA) injection into the target knee with a therapeutic aim including, but not limited to, hyaluronic acid, platelet-rich plasma (PRP),and stem cell therapies within 26 weeks prior to Day 1, or IA glucocorticoids within 12 weeks prior to Day 1
  • Effusion of the target knee clinically requiring aspiration within 12 weeks prior to Day 1
  • Use of electrotherapy, acupuncture, physical therapy, therapeutic ultrasound, and/or chiropractic treatments for knee OA within 4 weeks prior to Day 1
  • Any bone fracture(s) within 26 weeks prior to the Screening Visit
  • Previous treatment with SM04690
  • Subjects who have previously failed screening on this protocol and fail to meet rescreening criteria
  • Participation in a clinical research trial that included the receipt of an investigational product (IP) or any experimental therapeutic procedure within 26 weeks prior to the Screening Visit, or planned participation in any such trial
  • Treatment with systemic (oral, intramuscular, or intravenous) glucocorticoids ≥10 mg prednisone or the equivalent per day within 4 weeks prior to Day 1, or subjects on \<10 mg prednisone or the equivalent per day who have not maintained a stable regimen for at least 2 weeks prior to Day 1 in the opinion of the Investigator
  • +19 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (99)

Research Site

Birmingham, Alabama, 35205, United States

Location

Research Site

Birmingham, Alabama, 35215, United States

Location

Research Site

Birmingham, Alabama, 35216, United States

Location

Research Site

Peoria, Arizona, 85381, United States

Location

Research Site

Phoenix, Arizona, 85037, United States

Location

Research Site

Tucson, Arizona, 85712, United States

Location

Research Site

Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205, United States

Location

Research Site

Anaheim, California, 92805, United States

Location

Research Site

Garden Grove, California, 92840, United States

Location

Research Site

Norco, California, 92860, United States

Location

Research Site

Pomona, California, 91767, United States

Location

Research Site

San Diego, California, 92103, United States

Location

Research Site

San Marcos, California, 92078, United States

Location

Research Site

Spring Valley, California, 91978, United States

Location

Research Site

Westminster, California, 92683, United States

Location

Research Site

Boulder, Colorado, 80301, United States

Location

Research Site

Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80918, United States

Location

Research Site

Denver, Colorado, 80209, United States

Location

Research Site

Waterbury, Connecticut, 06708, United States

Location

Research Site

Clearwater, Florida, 33761, United States

Location

Research Site

Coral Gables, Florida, 33134, United States

Location

Research Site

Hialeah, Florida, 33016, United States

Location

Research Site

Miami, Florida, 33143, United States

Location

Research Site

Miami Lakes, Florida, 33014, United States

Location

Research Site

Orlando, Florida, 32806, United States

Location

Research Site

Oviedo, Florida, 32765, United States

Location

Research Site

Port Orange, Florida, 32127, United States

Location

Research Site

Sunrise, Florida, 33351, United States

Location

Research Site

West Palm Beach, Florida, 33409, United States

Location

Research Site

Winter Haven, Florida, 33880, United States

Location

Research Site #1

Winter Park, Florida, 32789, United States

Location

Research Site #2

Winter Park, Florida, 32789, United States

Location

Research Site

Marietta, Georgia, 30060, United States

Location

Research Site

Newnan, Georgia, 30265, United States

Location

Research Site

Stockbridge, Georgia, 30281, United States

Location

Research Site

Woodstock, Georgia, 30189, United States

Location

Research Site

Boise, Idaho, 83713, United States

Location

Research Site

Meridian, Idaho, 83642, United States

Location

Research Site

Bloomington, Illinois, 61704, United States

Location

Research Site

Gurnee, Illinois, 60031, United States

Location

Research Site

Oak Brook, Illinois, 60523, United States

Location

Research Site

Rockford, Illinois, 61114, United States

Location

Research Site

Anderson, Indiana, 46011, United States

Location

Research Site

Evansville, Indiana, 47714, United States

Location

Research Site

Valparaiso, Indiana, 46383, United States

Location

Research Site

Kansas City, Kansas, 66160, United States

Location

Research Site

Wichita, Kansas, 67205, United States

Location

Research Site

Monroe, Louisiana, 71203, United States

Location

Research Site

New Orleans, Louisiana, 70124, United States

Location

Research Site

Wheaton, Maryland, 20902, United States

Location

Research Site

Boston, Massachusetts, 02111, United States

Location

Research Site

Bay City, Michigan, 48706, United States

Location

Research Site

Troy, Michigan, 48085, United States

Location

Research Site

Hazelwood, Missouri, 63042, United States

Location

Research Site

St Louis, Missouri, 63141, United States

Location

Research Site

La Vista, Nebraska, 68128, United States

Location

Research Site

Lincoln, Nebraska, 68516, United States

Location

Research Site

Omaha, Nebraska, 68114, United States

Location

Research Site

Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87108, United States

Location

Research Site

Great Neck, New York, 11021, United States

Location

Research Site

Hartsdale, New York, 10530, United States

Location

Research Site

New York, New York, 10016, United States

Location

Research Site 1

New York, New York, 10021, United States

Location

Research Site 2

New York, New York, 10021, United States

Location

Research Site

Rochester, New York, 14609, United States

Location

Research Site

Williamsville, New York, 14221, United States

Location

Research Site

Charlotte, North Carolina, 28209, United States

Location

Research Site

Leland, North Carolina, 28451, United States

Location

Research Site

Salisbury, North Carolina, 28144, United States

Location

Research Site

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103, United States

Location

Research Site

Fargo, North Dakota, 58104, United States

Location

Research Site

Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219, United States

Location

Research Site

Cincinnati, Ohio, 45224, United States

Location

Research Site

Cincinnati, Ohio, 45242, United States

Location

Research Site

Columbus, Ohio, 43235, United States

Location

Research Site

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73103, United States

Location

Research Site

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73112, United States

Location

Research Site

Duncansville, Pennsylvania, 16635, United States

Location

Research Site

Fort Mill, South Carolina, 29707, United States

Location

Research Site

Greenville, South Carolina, 29607, United States

Location

Research Site

Greer, South Carolina, 29651, United States

Location

Research Site

Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, 29464, United States

Location

Research Site

Rapid City, South Dakota, 57702, United States

Location

Research Site

Austin, Texas, 78745, United States

Location

Research Site

Bedford, Texas, 76021, United States

Location

Research Site

Carrollton, Texas, 75007, United States

Location

Research Site

Dallas, Texas, 75231, United States

Location

Research Site

Edinburg, Texas, 78539, United States

Location

Research Site

Houston, Texas, 77029, United States

Location

Research Site

Houston, Texas, 77055, United States

Location

Research Site

Plano, Texas, 75075, United States

Location

Research Site

San Antonio, Texas, 78215, United States

Location

Research Site

San Antonio, Texas, 78229, United States

Location

Research Site

San Antonio, Texas, 78258, United States

Location

Research Site

Draper, Utah, 84020, United States

Location

Research Site

Murray, Utah, 84123, United States

Location

Research Site

Salt Lake City, Utah, 84107, United States

Location

Research Site

Charlottesville, Virginia, 22911, United States

Location

Research Site

Richmond, Virginia, 23219, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Tambiah J, Kennedy S, Swearingen C, McAlindon T, Yazici Y. Impact of structural severity on outcomes in knee osteoarthritis: an analysis of data from phase 2 and phase 3 lorecivivint clinical trials. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2025 May 1;64(5):2583-2590. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keae610.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis, KneeOsteoarthritis

Interventions

lorecivivint

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ArthritisJoint DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesRheumatic Diseases

Limitations and Caveats

This trial was conducted during COVID-19 and its confounding effects on clinical outcomes in knee OA patients based on observational data have been reported (Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2020;28(8):2435-43). Structural progression enrichment, leading to a severely damaged OA population in the OA-11 trial, might have confounded short-term therapeutic pain detection and repeat dosing may be required to demonstrate clinical benefit in severely damaged OA populations.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Christopher Swearingen, PhD, VP of Biometrics
Organization
Biosplice Therapeutics

Study Officials

  • Yusuf Yazici, M.D.

    Biosplice Therapeutics, Inc.

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 23, 2019

First Posted

April 26, 2019

Study Start

May 17, 2019

Primary Completion

August 20, 2021

Study Completion

August 20, 2021

Last Updated

February 13, 2026

Results First Posted

February 13, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations