Patient-Reported and Radiographic Outcomes in Evaluating Lorecivivint (SM04690) for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis
STRIDES-Xray
A 56-Week, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of a Single Injection of SM04690 Injected in the Target Knee Joint of Moderately to Severely Symptomatic Osteoarthritis Subjects
1 other identifier
interventional
501
1 country
99
Brief Summary
This phase 3 study is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of lorecivivint injected intra-articularly (IA) into the target knee (most painful) joint of moderately to severely symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) subjects at a single dose of 0.07 mg lorecivivint per 2 mL injection. This study will utilize radiographs and patient reported outcomes (PROs) to evaluate the safety and efficacy of lorecivivint.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3 knee-osteoarthritis
Started May 2019
Typical duration for phase_3 knee-osteoarthritis
99 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 23, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 26, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 17, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 20, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 20, 2021
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 13, 2026
CompletedFebruary 13, 2026
January 1, 2026
2.3 years
April 23, 2019
December 11, 2025
January 28, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change From Baseline in OA Pain in the Target Knee (Pain NRS)
Evaluate change from baseline OA pain in the target knee as assessed by the weekly averages of daily pain numeric rating scale (NRS). The pain NRS is an 11-point scale \[0-10\] for subject self-reporting of average knee pain in the last 24 hours; 0 indicates no pain, and 10 represents the worst possible pain.
Baseline and Week 12
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Change From Baseline in OA Pain in the Target Knee (Pain NRS)
Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in OA Pain in the Target Knee (Pain NRS)
Baseline and Week 52
Change From Baseline in OA Function in the Target Knee (WOMAC Function)
Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline in OA Function in the Target Knee (WOMAC Function)
Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in OA Function in the Target Knee (WOMAC Function)
Baseline and Week 52
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (1)
Change From Baseline in Medial Joint Space Width (mJSW) in the Target Knee
Baseline and Week 52
Study Arms (2)
0.07 mg lorecivivint
EXPERIMENTALOne intra-articular injection of 0.07 mg lorecivivint in 2 ml vehicle
Vehicle
PLACEBO COMPARATOROne intra-articular injection of 0 mg lorecivivint in 2 ml vehicle
Interventions
Healthcare professional-administered intra-articular injection; performed on Day 1
Healthcare professional-administered intra-articular injection; performed on Day 1
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Males and females between 40 and 80 years of age, inclusive, in general good health apart from their knee OA
- Ambulatory (single assistive devices such as canes allowed if needed less than 50% of the time, subjects requiring a walker are excluded)
- Diagnosis of femorotibial OA in the target knee by standard American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria at the Screening Visit (clinical AND radiographic criteria); OA of the knee is not to be secondary to any rheumatologic conditions (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis)
- mJSW by radiograph between 1.5 and 4 mm, inclusive, in the target knee within 12 weeks of the Screening Visit as assessed by independent central readers
- Radiographic disease Stage 2 or 3 in the target knee within 12 weeks of the Screening Visit according to the Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grading of knee OA as assessed by independent central readers
- Pain compatible with OA of the knee(s) for at least 26 weeks prior to the Screening Visit
- Primary source of pain throughout the body is due to OA in the target knee
- Body mass index (BMI) ≤ 40 kg/m2 at the Screening Visit
- Widespread Pain Index (WPI) score of ≤ 4 and a Symptom Severity Question 2 (SSQ2) score of ≤ 2 at the Screening Visit and Day 1
- Pain NRS scores recorded for the target knee on at least 4 out of the 7 days immediately preceding Day 1
- Pain NRS scores recorded for the nontarget knee on at least 4 out of the 7 days immediately preceding Day 1
- Daily OA knee pain diary average NRS intensity score ≥ 4 and ≤ 8 in the target knee on the 11-point (0-10) NRS scale for the 7 days immediately preceding Day 1
- Daily OA knee pain diary average NRS intensity score \< 4 in the nontarget knee on the 11-point (0-10) NRS scale for the 7 days immediately preceding Day 1
- WOMAC Pain of 20-40 (out of 50) for the target knee at baseline regardless of if the subject is on symptomatic oral treatment (baseline questionnaire completed during the screening period prior to randomization)
- WOMAC Function of 68-136 (out of 170) for the target knee at baseline regardless of if the subject is on symptomatic oral treatment (baseline questionnaire completed during the screening period prior to randomization)
- +5 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant women, breastfeeding woman, and women who are not post-menopausal (defined as 12 months with no menses without an alternative medical cause) or permanently surgically sterile (includes hysterectomy, bilateral salpingectomy, and bilateral oophorectomy), who have a positive or indeterminate pregnancy test result at the Screening Visit or Day 1
- Women who are not post-menopausal or permanently surgically sterile who are sexually active, and who are not willing to use birth control during the study period
- Men who are sexually active and of reproductive potential, who have partners who are capable of becoming pregnant, and who are not willing to use birth control during the study period
- Significant malalignment of anatomical axis (medial angle formed by the femur and tibia) of the target knee (varus \> 10°, valgus \> 10°) by radiograph within 12 weeks of the Screening Visit as assessed by independent central readers
- Partial or complete joint replacement in either knee
- Currently requires use of a lower extremity prosthesis, and/or a structural knee brace (i.e., a knee brace that contains hardware)
- Any surgery (e.g., arthroscopy) in either knee within 26 weeks prior to Day 1
- Intra-articular (IA) injection into the target knee with a therapeutic aim including, but not limited to, hyaluronic acid, platelet-rich plasma (PRP),and stem cell therapies within 26 weeks prior to Day 1, or IA glucocorticoids within 12 weeks prior to Day 1
- Effusion of the target knee clinically requiring aspiration within 12 weeks prior to Day 1
- Use of electrotherapy, acupuncture, physical therapy, therapeutic ultrasound, and/or chiropractic treatments for knee OA within 4 weeks prior to Day 1
- Any bone fracture(s) within 26 weeks prior to the Screening Visit
- Previous treatment with SM04690
- Subjects who have previously failed screening on this protocol and fail to meet rescreening criteria
- Participation in a clinical research trial that included the receipt of an investigational product (IP) or any experimental therapeutic procedure within 26 weeks prior to the Screening Visit, or planned participation in any such trial
- Treatment with systemic (oral, intramuscular, or intravenous) glucocorticoids ≥10 mg prednisone or the equivalent per day within 4 weeks prior to Day 1, or subjects on \<10 mg prednisone or the equivalent per day who have not maintained a stable regimen for at least 2 weeks prior to Day 1 in the opinion of the Investigator
- +19 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (99)
Research Site
Birmingham, Alabama, 35205, United States
Research Site
Birmingham, Alabama, 35215, United States
Research Site
Birmingham, Alabama, 35216, United States
Research Site
Peoria, Arizona, 85381, United States
Research Site
Phoenix, Arizona, 85037, United States
Research Site
Tucson, Arizona, 85712, United States
Research Site
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205, United States
Research Site
Anaheim, California, 92805, United States
Research Site
Garden Grove, California, 92840, United States
Research Site
Norco, California, 92860, United States
Research Site
Pomona, California, 91767, United States
Research Site
San Diego, California, 92103, United States
Research Site
San Marcos, California, 92078, United States
Research Site
Spring Valley, California, 91978, United States
Research Site
Westminster, California, 92683, United States
Research Site
Boulder, Colorado, 80301, United States
Research Site
Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80918, United States
Research Site
Denver, Colorado, 80209, United States
Research Site
Waterbury, Connecticut, 06708, United States
Research Site
Clearwater, Florida, 33761, United States
Research Site
Coral Gables, Florida, 33134, United States
Research Site
Hialeah, Florida, 33016, United States
Research Site
Miami, Florida, 33143, United States
Research Site
Miami Lakes, Florida, 33014, United States
Research Site
Orlando, Florida, 32806, United States
Research Site
Oviedo, Florida, 32765, United States
Research Site
Port Orange, Florida, 32127, United States
Research Site
Sunrise, Florida, 33351, United States
Research Site
West Palm Beach, Florida, 33409, United States
Research Site
Winter Haven, Florida, 33880, United States
Research Site #1
Winter Park, Florida, 32789, United States
Research Site #2
Winter Park, Florida, 32789, United States
Research Site
Marietta, Georgia, 30060, United States
Research Site
Newnan, Georgia, 30265, United States
Research Site
Stockbridge, Georgia, 30281, United States
Research Site
Woodstock, Georgia, 30189, United States
Research Site
Boise, Idaho, 83713, United States
Research Site
Meridian, Idaho, 83642, United States
Research Site
Bloomington, Illinois, 61704, United States
Research Site
Gurnee, Illinois, 60031, United States
Research Site
Oak Brook, Illinois, 60523, United States
Research Site
Rockford, Illinois, 61114, United States
Research Site
Anderson, Indiana, 46011, United States
Research Site
Evansville, Indiana, 47714, United States
Research Site
Valparaiso, Indiana, 46383, United States
Research Site
Kansas City, Kansas, 66160, United States
Research Site
Wichita, Kansas, 67205, United States
Research Site
Monroe, Louisiana, 71203, United States
Research Site
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70124, United States
Research Site
Wheaton, Maryland, 20902, United States
Research Site
Boston, Massachusetts, 02111, United States
Research Site
Bay City, Michigan, 48706, United States
Research Site
Troy, Michigan, 48085, United States
Research Site
Hazelwood, Missouri, 63042, United States
Research Site
St Louis, Missouri, 63141, United States
Research Site
La Vista, Nebraska, 68128, United States
Research Site
Lincoln, Nebraska, 68516, United States
Research Site
Omaha, Nebraska, 68114, United States
Research Site
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87108, United States
Research Site
Great Neck, New York, 11021, United States
Research Site
Hartsdale, New York, 10530, United States
Research Site
New York, New York, 10016, United States
Research Site 1
New York, New York, 10021, United States
Research Site 2
New York, New York, 10021, United States
Research Site
Rochester, New York, 14609, United States
Research Site
Williamsville, New York, 14221, United States
Research Site
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28209, United States
Research Site
Leland, North Carolina, 28451, United States
Research Site
Salisbury, North Carolina, 28144, United States
Research Site
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103, United States
Research Site
Fargo, North Dakota, 58104, United States
Research Site
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219, United States
Research Site
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45224, United States
Research Site
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45242, United States
Research Site
Columbus, Ohio, 43235, United States
Research Site
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73103, United States
Research Site
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73112, United States
Research Site
Duncansville, Pennsylvania, 16635, United States
Research Site
Fort Mill, South Carolina, 29707, United States
Research Site
Greenville, South Carolina, 29607, United States
Research Site
Greer, South Carolina, 29651, United States
Research Site
Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, 29464, United States
Research Site
Rapid City, South Dakota, 57702, United States
Research Site
Austin, Texas, 78745, United States
Research Site
Bedford, Texas, 76021, United States
Research Site
Carrollton, Texas, 75007, United States
Research Site
Dallas, Texas, 75231, United States
Research Site
Edinburg, Texas, 78539, United States
Research Site
Houston, Texas, 77029, United States
Research Site
Houston, Texas, 77055, United States
Research Site
Plano, Texas, 75075, United States
Research Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78215, United States
Research Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78229, United States
Research Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78258, United States
Research Site
Draper, Utah, 84020, United States
Research Site
Murray, Utah, 84123, United States
Research Site
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84107, United States
Research Site
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22911, United States
Research Site
Richmond, Virginia, 23219, United States
Related Publications (1)
Tambiah J, Kennedy S, Swearingen C, McAlindon T, Yazici Y. Impact of structural severity on outcomes in knee osteoarthritis: an analysis of data from phase 2 and phase 3 lorecivivint clinical trials. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2025 May 1;64(5):2583-2590. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keae610.
PMID: 39495154DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
This trial was conducted during COVID-19 and its confounding effects on clinical outcomes in knee OA patients based on observational data have been reported (Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2020;28(8):2435-43). Structural progression enrichment, leading to a severely damaged OA population in the OA-11 trial, might have confounded short-term therapeutic pain detection and repeat dosing may be required to demonstrate clinical benefit in severely damaged OA populations.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Christopher Swearingen, PhD, VP of Biometrics
- Organization
- Biosplice Therapeutics
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Yusuf Yazici, M.D.
Biosplice Therapeutics, Inc.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 23, 2019
First Posted
April 26, 2019
Study Start
May 17, 2019
Primary Completion
August 20, 2021
Study Completion
August 20, 2021
Last Updated
February 13, 2026
Results First Posted
February 13, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share