Effectiveness of a Four-level Chinese Emergency Triage Scale in Mainland China
The Reliability and Validity of a Four-level Chinese Emergency Triage Scale in Mainland China
1 other identifier
observational
30,687
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Inter-rater reliability between experts and triage nurses was assessed in 484 emergency patients. The criterion-related validity was evaluated in other 30687 emergency patients, based on emergency department (ED) mortality, the length of stay in ED, the number of discharge, and hospitalization (intensive care/general ward).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jan 2018
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 22, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 24, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2020
CompletedJune 18, 2021
June 1, 2021
2 years
April 22, 2019
June 14, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Inter-rater reliability
inter-rater reliability as the agreement between triage nurses and experts
2019-10-1
emergency department (ED) mortality
2019-12-31
the number of discharge
2019-12-31
Secondary Outcomes (1)
the number of hospitalization
2019-12-31
Study Arms (1)
emergency triage patients
triage Level I triage Level II triage Level III triage Level IV
Interventions
a four-level category system, i.e. life-threatening (Level I), emergent (Level II), urgent (Level III) and semi-urgent (Level IV) . This system contains critical indicators (cardiac arrest, shock, and apnea), high risk indicators (ACS and DKA), single objective indicators (SBP, RR, HR, and SpO2) and MEWS (synthesis indicator). According to patients' health care problems, patients are rated by nurses into one of the four mentioned levels.
Eligibility Criteria
All eligibility emergency patients
You may qualify if:
- Patients, older than 14 years and admitted to the ED, were eligible for this study.
You may not qualify if:
- Gynecologic and obstetric emergencies
- Patients, who left against medical advice or hadn't been aided by a doctor
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang Universitylead
- Beijing Chao Yang Hospitalcollaborator
- Tongji Hospitalcollaborator
- Henan Provincial People's Hospitalcollaborator
- Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Mecical Universitycollaborator
- First People's Hospital of Hangzhoucollaborator
- Second People's Hospital of Hangzhoucollaborator
- Changxing People's Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
SAHZhejiangU
Hangzhou, 310009, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 22, 2019
First Posted
April 24, 2019
Study Start
January 1, 2018
Primary Completion
December 31, 2019
Study Completion
December 30, 2020
Last Updated
June 18, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-06