Evaluation of an ACT and PBS Group for Parents and Education Staff
An Evaluation of an ACT and PBS Group for Parents and Education Staff of Children and Young People With an Intellectual Disability
1 other identifier
interventional
37
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Parents and education staff who work with children with intellectual disabilities (ID) are known to be at a higher risk of experiencing psychological distress. This study evaluates whether a therapeutic group for parents and education staff who work with children with ID is effective in reducing psychological distress and if so, how it does this and who it works for. The group will include two components: an Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) section and a section about positive behaviour support (PBS). ACT is a psychological therapy, the aim of which is to help people to live their lives based on what matters to them, whilst learning new ways of managing difficult thoughts and feelings. The PBS section aims to help participants to learn how to use positive strategies to reduce challenging behaviour. Both interventions have been shown to be effective on their own, but this study will examine if combining the two is helpful. Parents of children with ID and education staff who work closely with children with ID attending chosen schools or learning disability child and adolescent mental health services in NHS Lothian will be invited to participate in the study. The group will take place on three half days. Participants will complete questionnaires on the first and last day of the group and six weeks after it has finished. The questionnaires will be about psychological distress, confidence in caring for children with ID and seeing if the group changed how they cope with thoughts and feelings. Participants will also be invited to a focus group, which will think about if the intervention was helpful, and if so how it helped. If the group is effective, the investigators would hope to research the intervention in more depth with the aim of it being offered more widely in the future.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 6, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 29, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 17, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 16, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 16, 2019
CompletedMarch 25, 2020
March 1, 2020
9 months
November 6, 2018
March 24, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale 21 item (DASS-21)
The DASS-21 is a 21 item outcome measure of psychological distress, and as such can measure change in psychological distress when multiple measurements are taken. The DASS-21 has three subscales of depression (range 0-21), anxiety (range 0-20) and stress (range 0-21), where higher scores are indicative of higher levels of psychological distress. The scores are multiplied by two to be comparable to the longer form of this measure, the DASS-42.
Pre-intervention (day 1, immediately before first group session), Post-intervention (at two weeks, day 15, at the end of the third group session) and at a six-week follow up (before the focus group).
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI)
Pre-intervention (day 1, immediately before first group session), Post-intervention (at two weeks, day 15, at the end of the third group session) and at a six-week follow up (before the focus group).
Comprehensive Assessment of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Processes (ComPACT)
Pre-intervention (day 1, immediately before first group session), Post-intervention (at two weeks, day 15, at the end of the third group session) and at a six-week follow up (before the focus group).
Challenging Behaviour Self-Efficacy Scale (CBSES)
Pre-intervention (day 1, immediately before first group session), Post-intervention (at two weeks, day 15, at the end of the third group session) and at a six-week follow up (before the focus group).
Other Outcomes (1)
Workshop Evaluation Measure (WEM)
Post-intervention (at two weeks, day 15, at the end of the third group session).
Study Arms (1)
ACT and PBS group workshop
OTHERThe intervention in this study is an Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) and Positive Behaviour Support (PBS) group workshop for parents and education staff of children with intellectual disabilities.
Interventions
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Positive Behaviour Support Group Workshop. Three sessions of approximately three hour duration. Groups will consist of 5-10 parents or 5-10 members of education staff. The group will include both didactic and experiential elements.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Parent or Guardian of a Child aged 5-18 with a diagnosis of an Intellectual Disability/Learning Disability and experience of challenging behaviour.
- OR an employee working in a school for children with additional support needs, directly working with children with diagnosed Intellectual/Learning Disabilities.
- Must speak English fluently.
- Must be able to provide informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Temporary staff members (contract remaining of less than six months).
- Parents or Education Staff aged less than 18 years old.
- Parents or Education staff that have a diagnosis of an ID, such that they would not be able to understand the group materials or questionnaires and complete them independently.
- Individuals who are not able to provide informed consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Edinburghlead
- NHS Lothiancollaborator
Study Sites (2)
CAMHS-LD, NHS Lothian
Edinburgh, Midlothian, EH9 2AR, United Kingdom
Edinburgh City Council
Edinburgh, various, United Kingdom
Related Publications (4)
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
BACKGROUNDFaul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146.
PMID: 17695343BACKGROUNDCunningham, J. B., & McCrum-Gardner, E. (2007). Power, effect and sample size using GPower: Practical issues for researchers and members of research ethics committees. Evidence Based Midwifery, 5(4), 132-136.
BACKGROUNDMcConachie DA, McKenzie K, Morris PG, Walley RM. Acceptance and mindfulness-based stress management for support staff caring for individuals with intellectual disabilities. Res Dev Disabil. 2014 Jun;35(6):1216-27. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.03.005. Epub 2014 Mar 28.
PMID: 24685937BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Corinne Reid, MPsych, PhD
University of Edinburgh
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 6, 2018
First Posted
April 17, 2019
Study Start
March 29, 2019
Primary Completion
December 16, 2019
Study Completion
December 16, 2019
Last Updated
March 25, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share